Mumbai : Shiv Sena (UBT) chief, Uddhav Thackeray, on Saturday criticised Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and his faction’s MPs meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi.

Thackeray raised strong objections to PM Modi’s reported reassurance of, “Do not fear, I am behind you,” allegedly given to Shinde, questioning who the message was truly intended for, while legal proceedings regarding the Shiv Sena’s identity and symbol remain pending before the Supreme Court.

Addressing a press conference, Thackeray questioned the underlying motive behind the Prime Minister’s assurance to the Shinde faction.

“When Shinde used to visit earlier, he met Union Home Minister Amit Shah. Now it seems their boss has changed, and they directly meet PM Modi. What does ‘Do not fear, I am behind you’ signify? Is this threat-like message given to the Supreme Court? To Amit Shah? To Devendra Fadnavis, or to the administration? PM Modi must clarify who he was actually speaking to,” he said.

Thackeray pointed out that the meeting took place while critical hearings regarding the party’s name and election symbol were actively underway in the top court.

“While our case is being heard, the Prime Minister, who didn’t meet Gen Z representatives, is meeting traitors and telling them not to fear. This is highly objectionable. It is not just for the public to notice, but the Supreme Court should also take note and ask who this message was intended for,” he said.

Thackeray further asked whether the reassurance was an open invitation to potential defectors across parties, signaling that they could defect without fearing consequences.

He emphasised that the ongoing conflict has moved beyond the internal control of the Shiv Sena, characterising it as a national fight for democratic values.

Stating that “the virus of betrayal is taking the life of democracy,” Thackeray urged patriots and citizens from Kashmir to Kanyakumari who respect the Constitution to unite against such political practices.

Confirming that these developments would be brought to the notice of the Supreme Court, Thackeray questioned why the Shinde group continues to display apprehension despite political realignments.

Further, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP, Sanjay Raut, criticised Prime Minister Modi over his meeting with the Shinde faction MPs. Referencing the ongoing disruptions in Parliament, he accused the Prime Minister of avoiding parliamentary proceedings while finding time to host faction leaders.

“PM Modi has time to throw parties with fafda, dhokla, and jalebi for traitor MPs, but has no time to step into Parliament,” Raut stated in a social media post, labeling the meeting an “insult to the public and the Constitution”.

The political confrontation coincides with ongoing hearings before the Supreme Court Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant.

Representing the Thackeray group, senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued against the Election Commission of India’s decision to grant the official party name and symbol to the Shinde faction solely on legislative majority grounds.

Sibal contended that treating legislative strength as the sole metric undermines the organisational framework of political parties.

By Mumbai Press Bureau
MUMBAI — Constitutional courts are duty-bound to quash criminal proceedings launched merely to suppress dissent and must refrain from lecturing citizens on what they should or should not say, former Supreme Court judge Justice Abhay S. Oka emphasized at a legal event in the city.

Speaking at the inaugural Advocate Haroon Solkar Memorial Lecture Series held at the K.C. College auditorium in Mumbai, Justice Oka highlighted the urgent need to defend fundamental civil liberties amidst rising intolerance toward public criticism and opposition viewpoints.

The lecture focused on the theme “Article 19(1)(a) and Article 21: Followed or Forgotten?”, addressing the growing friction between state authority, judicial oversight, and constitutional rights.
“Not the Role of Courts to Preach or Teach”
Justice Oka—who served on the Supreme Court bench from August 2021 until May 2025—stressed that when citizens approach constitutional courts seeking relief against frivolous or politically motivated criminal prosecutions, the judiciary must stand at the forefront as their protective shield.

“The court may not like what the petitioners have said or expressed, but still it is the duty of the court to protect the freedom of speech and expression. It is not the function of the court to preach or teach the petitioner what he or she should have said or not said,” Justice Oka stated.

He added that judicial scrutiny in such matters should remain strictly limited to assessing whether an actual penal offense is disclosed under the law, rather than evaluating the social or political palatability of the statements.
Citing Sir Thomas More: “Rulers of the Day”
Invoking Irish writer Sir Thomas More, Justice Oka reminded the audience that in a vibrant democracy, citizens cannot be expected to express only opinions that please those in authority.

“Citizens are not expected to say only those things that are liked by the rulers of the day,” Justice Oka remarked, warning that suppressing unpopular viewpoints poses a direct threat to democratic governance.

“If democracy is to survive, we must guard and protect our freedoms guaranteed under Articles 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution of India—even if we have to pay a huge cost to protect these fundamental rights,” he urged the gathering of jurists, advocates, and legal scholars.

Peaceful Protest and “Forgotten Principles” of Dialogue
Underlining that peaceful assembly and demonstration are intrinsic to the right to free expression, Justice Oka emphasized that staging peaceful protests is often the primary lawful avenue citizens have to register dissatisfaction when public grievances go unaddressed.
While the state is not obligated to accept every demand, Justice Oka stressed that government institutions hold a fundamental obligation to engage in constructive dialogue.

“In a democracy, every citizen has a right to put forth his demands, and it is the duty of the state to deal with the same,” he noted. “The government may or may not accept it, but it is the government’s duty to consider it, have a dialogue and discussion. But perhaps with the passage of time, we have all forgotten these golden principles.”

He cautioned against the casual invocation of penal provisions against critics, journalists, and activists, pointing out that disagreement with an opinion should be met with an alternative viewpoint rather than punitive criminal proceedings.
State Obligations and Judicial Vigilance
Reflecting on constitutional duties, Justice Oka asserted that while citizens are frequently reminded of their obligations under Article 51A, the state holds a corresponding responsibility to uphold core constitutional ideals, including secularism, democracy, and personal liberty.

“In the present day, we rarely see the government respecting the ideals under the Constitution,” Justice Oka observed, calling on constitutional courts to remain ever-vigilant guardians against the erosion of fundamental freedoms. “I always believe that the courts must be at the forefront to protect the fundamental rights of citizens,” he concluded. “If courts are not going to protect these fundamental rights, then who is? It is the bounden duty of the courts to ensure that the Constitution and its ideals are not trampled upon.”

Mumbai: The government is failing to open new schools, with incidents coming to light where private and trust-run schools that provide education to children in poor and minority areas are facing pressure and FIRs due to hateful propaganda like ‘school jihad’.

In the wake of this serious issue, Mankhurdshivaji Nagar MLA Abu Asim Azmi today met newly appointed Additional Commissioner of Police (Additional CP) Dhananjay Kulkarni along with a delegation of schools facing such action and submitted a memorandum. The memorandum requested that if a police visit to a school is necessary for investigation or investigation, the officers should appear in plain clothes. The delegation urged the authorities to avoid coming out of the school premises with police vans or heavy police force so as not to create an atmosphere of fear and panic among children, parents and teachers. It said that the trustees are ready to personally visit the police station to provide any necessary documents or records required by the police. The attitude of the police towards educational institutions that uphold the right to education for children from poor neighborhoods should be sensitive, cooperative and respectful.

Speaking on the occasion, Abu Asim Azmi stressed that the educational environment should remain safe, impartial and free from fear at all times. He stressed that the future of children from disadvantaged areas should not be sacrificed for any hateful agenda or baseless punitive actions.