Connect with us
Monday,24-August-2026
Breaking News

National News

‘Do you want my son to commit suicide’: Sheezan’s mother speaks out

Published

on

 TV actor Sheezan Khan’s mother and his sisters — actresses Shafaq and Falaq Naaz — held a press conference in Mumbai in which they rubbished the allegations of ‘love jihad’ or that Tunisha was forced to wear the hijab.

The family asserted that Tunihsa’s mother ignored the state of her daughtere’s mental health. If she had paid some attention to it, Tunisha would have been alive today, the family alleged.

“Tunisha was like my sister.” Falak clarified. “All this talk about the hijab, dargah are baseless. Following a religion is our own personal choice. People are saying we forced her to wear a hijab, but the picture from one of her ‘Ali Baba: Dastan-e-Kabul’ shoots.”

She added that Tunisha was in her costume and no one forced her to wear a hijab.

Sheezan’s mother referred to the claim by Tunisha’s mother that Falaq had taken her daughter to a dargah. “You give us proof,” she countered.

She also opened up on Vanita Sharma’s accusation that Sheezan had slapped Tunisha. “If your child is being tortured on sets like this, will you just sit and talk on the phone? She used to talk to me over the phone, then why didn’t she tell me or take any action? She could have come to my place and we would have slapped Sheezan. Was she waiting for her daughter to take this extreme step?”

Sheezan’s mother also added that for her, Tunisha was like a 10-year-old child and she shared an incident when she was running high fever, her mother called her to take care of her daughter. Sheezan’s sister took care of Tunisha and Vanita Sharma texted saying that no one ever cared for her like them.

The distraught mother added: “One more thing, Vanita has lost her only child and her lawyer was busy taking a power of attorney. You have lost a child. Your mission should only be to find out why your child took this step. The truth should come out. How can a mother do this?

“Tunisha was like a younger daughter to me. She’s gone and I too want justice for her. But now, Vanita is after my son. What do you want, Vanita ji? Your daughter has committed suicide, do you want my son to commit suicide too? You are torturing him.”

Sheezan’s sister also claimed that Tunisha’s mental health was ignored and if it was given proper attention, she might have been alive. Sheezan’s lawyer Shailendra Mishra even denied that his client had any “mysterious girlfriend”.

Sheezan’s sister responded to the allegation by Tunisha’s mother that she had not been made a part of the family, but the fact is that she was invited to Sheezan’s birthday and even came on Diwali. She was also a part of the launch party of the show.

Mishra, the lawyer, added that Tunisha’s uncle in Chandigarh and her mother controlled her daughter’s finances.

“Tunisha used to panic a lot upon hearing the name of Sanjeev Kaushal. On the instigation of Sanjeev Kaushal, Tunisha’s mother broke her phone and tried to strangulate her. Sanjeev Kaushal and Tunisha’s mother used to control Tunisha’s life,” the lawyer alleged.

He added: “Tunisha was very happy with the time she spent with Sheezan’s family. Her so-called uncle, Pawan Sharma, was her former manager. He was fired four years ago because Tunisha was unhappy with his interference and his behaviour.”

The lawyer also claimed that Tunisha never got the love she needed from her mother and that if she had got that love at home, she would not have tried to find it outside.

He continued: “This was not Tunisha’s first relationship. She had two break-ups before, but she was never depressed like this. She knew Sheezan and his family for the past six months since the show started. When Sheezan wanted to break up, they both discussed the matter and decided to focus on their respective careers. Sheezan’s arrest is illegal.”

Sheezan’s sister alleged that Tunisha was forced to work since childhood and she was mentally traumatised because of that. If proper treatment had been administered to her, she would have been alive today.

The mother added that Sheezan and Tunisha connected with each other because he understood her trauma. They also claimed that Tunisha’s mother ignored her daughter’s mental health and forced her to work. She was even forced to act in music videos because her mother forced to. Tunisha wanted to travel on holidays, but she couldn’t.

Sheezan’s mother said: “We went to meet Tunisha’s mother and we wanted to improve their bond. She needed treatment for her mental health. Later, Tunisha and her mother came and asked for the doctor’s number.”

Sheezan’s sister Falaq addressed the love jihad charge and said: “Tunisha was like my sister. I met her on the sets of a shoot in Ladakh. Since then, I have acted like an elder sister to her. We could never see her in trouble. All this talk about hijab and dargah are baseless.” She added: “Why are you stuck in religious matters? You should be talking about mental health.”

Shafaq added: “It was being claimed that Tunisha had started speaking in Urdu. Kisi language se kya lena dena. We live in India. So, accepting a certain language or a religion does not prove anything. This is a very wrong assumption. Religion is very personal and we will never force anyone.”

The family claimed repeatedly that even after looking at her mental health, Tunisha’s mother always focused on her work.

Sheezan’s lawyer asserted that Tunisha had panic attack on December 16 and her mother was asked to be with her, but she was not there.

“Sheezan has never changed his statement from Day 1 and their break-up was not the reason for her suicide,” the lawyer said. “Tunisha was deprived of love from her childhood. Sheezan never ditched here; they decided mutually to focus on their respective careers. Tunisha was mentally depressed. She was even questioned about her tattoo and never allowed to travel alone,” he added.

The young actress committed suicide on December 24. She hanged herself in the make-up room of her co-star and former boyfriend, Sheezan Mohammed Khan.

Sheezan’s judicial custody has been extended for 14 days, after he was arrested for allegedly abetting Tunisha’s suicide. He was arrested by Valiv Police in Palghar district on December 26.

National News

Delhi Police solve 4 house theft, burglary cases; three arrested

Published

on

New Delhi, Aug 24: The Anti-Burglary Cell of Delhi Police’s South-West District has arrested two alleged burglars and a receiver of stolen property in connection with multiple house theft and burglary cases, recovering 42.11 grams of melted gold, two country-made pistols and a cache of house-breaking tools, police said in a press release issued on Monday.

The arrested accused have been identified as Mohd. Arif, Afsar and Inzamam Sheikh alias Raja Sheikh. According to the police, their arrests have helped resolve four cases of house theft and burglary registered in different parts of Delhi.

The police said the operation was launched after the Anti-Burglary Cell was directed to gather intelligence and take action against burglars operating in South-West District. A dedicated team comprising SI Bachchu Singh, HC Anshu, HC Kanti Lal, HC Sunil Kumar, HC Himmat Singh, HC Sanjay Kumar, HC Bhagirath, Ct. Ravinder, Ct. Lalit and Ct. Sachin was constituted under the leadership of Insp. Ram Kumar, I/C Anti Burglary Cell/SWD, and under the supervision of Sandeep Ghai, ACP/Operations/SWD.

During the investigation of two burglary cases registered at PS Palam Village, police analysed footage from around 700 CCTV cameras installed in and around the crime scenes. The footage allegedly showed the same group of suspects arriving at the locations on a motorcycle and committing the burglaries.

Police said technical analysis helped identify two suspects as Mohd. Arif and Irshad alias Bhanu, following which manual and technical surveillance was intensified.

On August 5, Mohd. Arif was arrested from Maujpur, Delhi. During interrogation, he allegedly disclosed that he and his associates had committed the two Palam-area burglaries using a stolen motorcycle. He also allegedly revealed that he and Irshad had stolen the motorcycle from the Keshav Puram area.

According to the police, a country-made pistol and house-breaking tools were recovered at Arif’s instance. The recovered tools included a hammer, iron pipe, pair of pliers, two spanners, screwdriver, key and wire cutter. Subsequently, co-accused Afsar was arrested from Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, and another country-made pistol was allegedly recovered from his possession.

The investigation also led police to Inzamam Sheikh alias Raja Sheikh, who was allegedly receiving stolen gold ornaments from the burglars. Police said 42.11 grams of melted gold, obtained from the stolen ornaments, was recovered from his possession.

The press release stated: “The team of Anti Burglary Cell, South-West District has arrested three accused persons, including two burglars, namely Mohd. Arif and Afsar and one receiver of stolen property, Inzamam Sheikh alias Raja Sheikh.”

Police further said that the accused are linked to four cases registered at PS Palam Village, PS Govind Puri and PS Keshav Puram.

Police said further investigation into the cases is underway.

Continue Reading

Crime

ED summons IAS officer Gyanendra Kumar for questioning in KPSC recruitment case

Published

on

Bengaluru, Aug 24: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has directed IAS officer Gyanendra Kumar to appear before the agency at its Bengaluru office on Tuesday morning for questioning in connection with its investigation into alleged irregularities in Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) recruitment.

Following a nearly nine-hour search at Kumar’s Bengaluru residence on Monday, ED officials pasted a notice on the house directing him to appear before the agency’s office in the Ganganagar area of Bengaluru. The notice specifies the date and time for his appearance, officials confirmed.

The ED conducted the search as part of its investigation into alleged irregularities in the recruitment of veterinary officers, in which candidates were allegedly asked to pay bribes ranging from Rs 70 lakh to Rs 80 lakh to secure appointments.

Kumar was not present at his residence when the ED team arrived. He had reportedly left Bengaluru three days earlier and travelled to Uttar Pradesh. State Home Minister Priyank Kharge said that the officer travelled there as his father was unwell.

According to sources, Kumar left his residence carrying two large bags and also took his laptop, mobile phone and other electronic devices with him. Consequently, the ED team reportedly found limited material at the residence.

The officials conducted an extensive search of the premises, checking cupboards, walls and areas beneath the floor with scanners to look for documents or other material that may have been concealed.

A diary and some records were reportedly recovered during the search. The officials also examined available bank statements and documents related to private companies allegedly entrusted with responsibilities connected with government recruitment.

Sources, however, said that most electronic devices and important documents were not found at the residence. Apart from old clothes and furniture, the team reportedly found little material of significance.

The ED team arrived at the apartment complex in three vehicles accompanied by CRPF personnel. The entrance was initially locked, and security personnel reportedly refused to allow the officials inside, stating that they had not received instructions to do so.

After the ED team contacted Kumar, the security staff allowed them into the complex. As the officer’s residence was locked, a locksmith was called to open the door. The process was reportedly videographed as part of the search procedure.

Kumar, a 2016-batch IAS officer, had served as Controller of Examinations at the KPSC until March. He was associated with conducting the Karnataka Administrative Service (KAS) examination and the recruitment process for veterinary officers.

The latest search comes three days after the ED searched the residence of former KPSC chairman Shivashankarappa Sahukar and other premises in connection with the alleged recruitment irregularities.

The ED has conducted searches at multiple locations across Karnataka as part of its investigation into the alleged KPSC recruitment scam. The agency is examining documents, financial records and other material to establish the alleged flow of funds and identify those allegedly involved in the recruitment irregularities.

Continue Reading

National News

Even under extreme emotional provocation, army personnel must yield to military discipline, rules AFT

Published

on

Jammu, Aug 23: The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) has held that excessive force cannot be used against civilians, asserting that a soldier, even under extreme emotional provocation, must yield to military discipline.

The apex military tribunal made the observation as it upheld a “severe displeasure” censure awarded to former Rashtriya Rifles sector commander, Brigadier Padmasambhava Acharya, over the December 2023 custodial deaths of three civilians in Dera Ki Gali in Jammu and Kashmir’s Poonch district.

It has also held that excessive force cannot be used against civilians.

“Excessive force was used in violation of the law. It was, thus, a failure of command and control function. Failure to stop use of excessive force and failure to pass clear directions were the direct fallout thereof,” it said.

Noting that ‘the troops involved in follow-up operations face a dilemma. Having lost their brothers in arms and that too in a brutal manner, makes their blood boil and development of emotions of revenge is quite natural”, it said: “On the other hand is discipline, instilled by rigorous training, commanding them to exercise restraint and scrupulously follow plans to trace the culprits.

“Even in war, the Indian soldier is known for his discipline and adherence to the Geneva Conventions is the rule,” the AFT order said.

The tribunal, however, has directed authorities not to maintain a record of the punishment in the officer’s file as the two-year penalty period has elapsed and ceased to be operative.

Dismissing the plea of Brigadier Acharya, the tribunal held that even under intense emotional provocation following the loss of comrades in counter-insurgency operations, human emotions must yield to military discipline, constitutional mandates, and strict human rights safeguards.

However, while addressing the specific policy provisions governing military censures, the tribunal directed the authorities not to maintain a record of the disciplinary action in the officer’s administrative file, treating it as an exception limited strictly to the facts of the case.

“This is a direction based on the facts of the instant case only and is not to be treated as a precedent or an exposition of the law,” the tribunal said in its order passed recently.

Referring to the Defence Ministry’s policy dated October 30, 2023, which stipulates that while a censure awarded to an officer typically remains part of his administrative record for 10 years, to be shared with selection and promotion boards, a “Severe Displeasure” issued by a Corps Commander remains operative for a maximum period of two years, the AFT said that the censure awarded to Brigadier Acharya on July 8, 2024.

The case relates to an operation launched on December 21, 2023, when a military convoy was ambushed near Dera Ki Gali (DKG), leaving four soldiers dead.

The bodies of two of the dead soldiers were also mutilated. In the subsequent search operations, sub-units rounded up local civilian suspects for questioning to gather actionable intelligence.

During interrogation at the Company Operating Base in Mastan Dhara, three civilian suspects succumbed to their injuries. A Court of Inquiry convened by HQ 16 Corps led to administrative action against Brigadier Acharya, the then commander of 13 Sector RR, for failing to exercise proper command and control, improper handling of civilians and failing to prevent excessive force.

Challenging the two-year censure issued by the General Officer Commanding of 16 Corps, the officer had argued that senior commanders, including the Corps Commander and the GOC of counter-insurgency force ‘Romeo’, were present at the DKG control room during the operations and should share responsibility.

He had also contended that the Corps Commander had acted as a judge in his own cause.

Rejecting these arguments, the tribunal clarified the operational hierarchy of field forces, ruling that direct command and control over ground operations rests with the commanding officer and the sector commander.

Higher commanders visiting forward control rooms to gain situational awareness do not exercise micro-level executive control over sub-unit tactical interrogations.

Citing landmark Supreme Court verdicts, the bench reiterated that internal-security duties require a distinct approach from conventional warfare, emphasising that Army guidelines strictly prohibiting physical force or third-degree methods during interrogation are legally-binding orders that must be scrupulously followed.

The Armed Forces Tribunal is based in Chandimandir, the headquarters of the Army’s Western Command, in Haryana’s Panchkula, adjacent to Chandigarh.

Continue Reading

Trending