Connect with us
Friday,31-October-2025
Breaking News

Politics

Srirangapatna’s is becoming Gyanvapi of Karnataka

Published

on

As the controversy surrounding the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi continues, Hindu activists in Karnataka are all set to take a legal recourse on surveying and inspecting the Jamia Masjid, located in the historical town of Srirangapatna in Mandya district.

Aswathi.S., District Commissioner (DC) of Mandya, has already received a petition by the activists to carry out an inspection to verify if the Jamia Masjid was built on the ruins of a Hanuman temple.

“The DC has informed us that she has already sent out a request to the government. If the government does not respond, we are ready to approach the court,” C.T. Manjunath, state secretary of the Narendra Modi Vichar Manch, told IANS, adding that legal action will be pursued in coordination with Hindu organizations.

Jamia Masjid, built by the erstwhile ruler of Mysuru Tipu Sultan, has come in the eye of the storm as Hindu organisations have announced the congregation of 6 lakh maladhaari devotees of Lord Hanuman in Srirangapatna during the upcoming Hanuman Jayanti, raising law and order concerns.

The organisations have also sought a nod from authorities to conduct prayers in the mosque.

The mosque authorities have already made several appeals to the authorities to protect the shrine from Hindu activists.

Jamia Masjid also called as Masjid-i-Ala, is located inside the Srirangapatna fort. Built in 1786-87, the mosque has three inscriptions that mentions nine names of the Prophet Muhammad.

The mosque has two minarets and is built over an elevated platform. There are galleried balconies that separate each stage of the minaret. The mosque is two-storied and unlike other mosques, it does not have a dome.

The Jamia Masjid is administered by the Bengaluru Circle of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

Meanwhile, C.T. Manjunath explains that they strongly believe with evidence that the Jamia Masjid was built after razing down a Hanuman temple.

“B. Lewis Rice, a British historian, archaeologist and educationist in his report to the ASI mentions about Hanuman temple on Page number 61 in 1935,” he told IANS.

“Apart from this, Malabar Manual, Mysore Gazetteer by Lewis Rice, Tareeq-e-Tipu, Haider-e-Nishani also give enough proof of razing down of temples by Tipu Sultan. The sword of Tipu Sultan has an inscription on it which reads that it will go against those who do not follow Islam.

“It is not intolerant to ask for our temple. There are 7 lakh active mosques in the country. If Hindus were to be intolerant, this would not have been possible. Even Muslim nations do not have such a great number of mosques,” he adds.

Manjunath says that there is a board put up by the ASI which bans any activity in the mosque, but Tablighis arrive here every year for training.

“The idol if Goddess Annapoorneshwari is not found now. The idols and footprints of Hindu idols, religious symbols are chiseled out. The issue has been raised already,” he explains.

Hindu activists maintain that there are emblems of the erstwhile Hoysala kingdom inside the mosque. There is ‘Kalyani’ (traditional Hindu water body built inside temple premises) inside the mosque. Every pillar also has the emblem of ‘Gandubherunda’ (two-headed bird in Hindu mythology) and ‘Simha’ (lion).

Hindu activists believe that Hanuman temples are built in eight directions of the historical Sri Ranganatha Swamy Temple in Srirangapatna town. The Jamia Masjid was also one among them.

Nanje Gowda, a senior journalist working for a reputed Kannada daily, countered the view and told IANS: “The famous, most sacred and ancient 9th century Sri Ranganatha Temple in Srirangapatna town which is located within 200 metres of Tipu Palace Lotus Mahal is intact. It has not been disturbed by either Tipu Sultan or his father Hyder Ali. In fact the temple premises have Hyder ‘mantapa’ (platform). Hyder Ali has generously contributed to the temple.”

Gowda fears that this would become a major issue in the region. “After hijab crisis, saffron shawls have reached almost all Hindu students. Anything can happen in the coming days,” he said.

Rishi Kumar Swamiji of Kali Mutt was arrested in January on charges of giving a call to demolish the Jamia Masjid.

He had demanded for it to be closed until it was decided whether it is a temple or a mosque.

“Even a Hindu child will get provoked after seeing the pillars, platforms for Nag devtas. I am a sage. How should I feel? I naturally felt pained on seeing what had happened to my temple. I have faith in law. Through this law, the Ram Mandir is being in Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh. I will get justice in the case,” Rishi Kumar Swamiji said.

“For Babri Masjid, the authorities have to dig land beneath the mosque and find proof. But, in this case the authorities in Srirangapatna city will just have to get documents of the mosque.”

The historical Srirangapatna is regarded as Karnataka’s Ayodhya by Hindu activists.

Sources say that with Hindu activists taking up the issue, the party is going to reap rich electoral success in the region which is presently considered as the bastion of regional party JD (S).

Srirangapatna town is located in Mandya district, considered as the heartland of the dominant Vokkaliga community. With Opposition leader Siddaramaiah, State Congress President D.K. Shivakumar pitching in against Hindutva ideology, experts say, it won’t be easy for BJP to reap political benefits here.

It also remains to be seen how the situation unfolds in the town, which will have a direct impact on capital Bengaluru.

Crime

Powai Hostage Case: Mumbai Police Recover Pistol, Petrol & Chemicals From RA Studio; Rohit Arya’s Body Sent For Postmortem

Published

on

Mumbai: The Mumbai Police have recovered a pistol, petrol, inflammable rubber solution, and a lighter from the Powai studio where Rohit Arya held 17 children and two adults hostage on Thursday. The Mumbai Crime Branch has taken over the investigation, registering a case under Sections 109(1), 140, and 287 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. A forensic analysis of the seized materials is currently underway, officials told Media on Friday.

Earlier on Friday morning, Arya’s body was brought to the JJ Hospital mortuary for postmortem by the Crime Branch team. The 50-year-old filmmaker from Pune was shot during the rescue operation and later declared dead at 5:15 pm on Thursday.

The three-hour hostage crisis unfolded around 1:30 pm at R A Studio, located in the Mahavir Classic building, Powai, when Powai police received an alert about a man holding children captive. The children, aged 10 to 12 years, had been attending auditions for a web series for the past two days.

Before police intervention, Arya released a video message explaining his motives. In the clip, he said he had chosen to take hostages instead of committing suicide, insisting he was ‘not a terrorist’ and had no demand for money. Arya claimed he only wanted to ask some moral and ethical questions and warned that any wrong move by the authorities could lead him to set the studio on fire, potentially harming the children.

“I want to speak to some people… I should not be held responsible if anything happens,” Arya said in the video, adding that after the conversation, he would walk out. His demands, however, remained vague.

The Mumbai Police swiftly mobilised teams from the Quick Response Team (QRT), Bomb Detection and Disposal Squad, Fire Brigade, and negotiators. According to Deputy Commissioner of Police (Zone X) Datta Nalawade, officers entered the building through a duct using a ladder to reach the first floor, where Arya was holding the hostages.

During the rescue, Arya reportedly lunged toward the officers with an air gun and was hit by a police bullet during the ensuing scuffle. “All 17 children and two adults were rescued safely,” said Joint Commissioner of Police (Law and Order) Satyanarayan, confirming the operation’s success around 4:15 pm.

Continue Reading

Crime

Fake BARC Scientist Case: Delhi Police Arrest Accused’s Brother In Multi-State Forgery And Espionage Racket

Published

on

Mumbai: In the sensational fake BARC scientist case, fresh revelations have emerged linking the main accused, Akhtar Hussain Qutubuddin Ahmed alias Alexander Palmer (60), and his relatives to a sprawling forgery network that extended from Mumbai to Jharkhand and Delhi.

The Delhi Police Special Cell has arrested Akhtar’s brother, Adil Hussaini alias Syed Adil Hussain (59 from the Seemapuri area of Delhi for allegedly procuring multiple fake passports and providing sensitive information to foreign entities.

According to sources, fake scientist Akhtar was arrested from Yari Road, Versova on October 17 and now he is in judicial custody. Following Akhtar’s interrogation accused Monazir Khan (34) was arrested from Jamshedpur, Jharkhand on October 25. Monazir is in police custody till November 1.

Akhtar’s Brother Adil possessed one genuine and two allegedly forged passports. His arrest came after crucial inputs from the Mumbai crime branch, which earlier nabbed Akhtar and his associate Monazir Nazimuddin Khan from Jamshedpur. Investigations suggest Adil played a key role in coordinating the fake identity network and arranging for forged documents through Monazir.

Police investigations revealed that Monazir had fabricated fake Aadhaar, PAN cards, and passports under the name Ali Reza Hoseini alias Alexander Palmer for Akhtar in 2016–17, charging ₹19,000 for the job.

These forged documents enabled Akhtar to travel to several countries between 2017 and 2025. Monazir also created fake academic certificates including 10th, 12th, BSc, BE (Mechanical), and MBA degrees allegedly to support Akhtar’s false credentials as a scientist.

Crime Branch officers recovered crucial evidence from Monazir’s office in Jamshedpur, including seven digital storage devices and multiple forged educational and identity documents of Akhtar and Adil.

It was also found that Monazir provided fake documents to other individuals, suggesting a wider racket in Jharkhand involving the sale of counterfeit educational certificates and IDs.

During Akhtar’s interrogation, he claimed that all three of his brothers Asif, Arif, and Adil were deceased. He said Asif died in Saudi Arabia, Arif in Prayagraj, and Adil in Jamshedpur. However, investigators later discovered that Adil was alive and residing in Delhi. He was arrested by the Delhi Police Special Cell on October 26.

The Investigation revealed that Adil had obtained passports under multiple identities Mohammad Adil Hussaini and Naseem Syed Adil Hussain and had travelled to several countries, including Pakistan. This raised suspicions of possible espionage activities or attempts to pass on sensitive nuclear-related information abroad.

Police sources confirmed that Monazir had used an incomplete address as Road No. 6, near Grace College, Jawahar Nagar, Jamshedpur — when applying for Akhtar’s passport under the name Alexander Palmer. He later admitted this was deliberate since the area had a predominantly Christian population, making the name “Alexander Palmer” appear genuine.

Despite the incomplete address, neither the passport office nor the local police flagged any objections during verification, raising serious concerns about administrative lapses.

Similarly, Adil’s forged passport also carried an incomplete address referring to the same sold Jamshedpur property once owned by the Akhtar’s family. Authorities are now investigating how such major discrepancies escaped detection during official scrutiny.

According to investigators, Akhtar and Adil used their fake identities to travel across at least five countries, mostly in the Gulf region. Akhtar, posing as “Alexander Palmer,” allegedly presented himself as a BARC scientist at various consulates, showing printed nuclear maps sourced from magazines and online material. He claimed to possess classified information in exchange for money.

Forensic analysis of Akhtar’s mobile phone revealed that he used the Super VPN Pro app to mask his IP location, helping him appear to be in another country while online. Investigators suspect this was used to communicate with foreign contacts undetected.

The Mumbai crime branch, Delhi Police special cell, and Jharkhand Police are now jointly investigating how the accused obtained multiple Indian passports and fake government IDs. Crime branch officers have also contacted Mumbai airport immigration authorities to verify how Akhtar managed to clear international travel checks using these forged identities.

The police have also confirmed that Adil may have been in touch with foreign nuclear agencies while in Delhi. The special cell is expected to seek Akhtar’s custody soon to interrogate both brothers face-to-face.

This case, which began with the arrest of a fake scientist from Versova, has now evolved into one of India’s most complex identity forgery and espionage investigations exposing deep administrative failures and a possible cross-border intelligence network.

Continue Reading

Business

CBI Chargesheet Alleges ₹2,796 Crore Yes Bank Fraud Involving Anil Ambani’s ADA Group And Rana Kapoor

Published

on

Mumbai: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) which is probing the transactions between Yes bank through its former Managing Director Rana Kapoor and Anil Dhirubhai Ambani (ADA) Group company, has alleged that the funds received from the bank in M/s Reliance Home Finance Limited (RHFL) and Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL) were further diverted to several shell companies, created only to receive funds.

CBI has submitted a chargesheet before the special CBI court against Rana Kapoor and his family, Anil Ambani and other companies for causing loss to Yes bank to the tune of Rs 2796.77 crores, as the investments made in ADA group could not be recovered.

The agency has said that during 2017-2019, Yes Bank had invested Rs. 2965.00 crores and Rs 2045.00 crores through subscription of Non- Convertible Debentures (NCDs) & Commercial Papers (CPs) of M/s RHFL and M/s RCFL respectively.

The agency has in its chargesheet listed down several shell companies which further received funds from RHFL and RCFL. The list of these shell companies, as mentioned in CBI’s chargesheet include – Gamesa Investment Management Pvt Ltd (GIMPL), Species Commerce and Trade Pvt, Crest Logistics and Engineers Pvt Ltd, Gamesa Investment Management Pvt Ltd, and Mohanbir Hi-Tech Build Pvt Ltd.

The agency claimed that, “the primary purpose of these shell companies was to receive funds from RHFL and RCFL acted on instructions of Anil Ambani.”

CBI claimed that Anil Ambani was unable to directly invest the funds available at the disposal of M/s Reliance Nippon Mutual Fund in the financial companies of the ADA Group, which were under stress, due SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations. Hence in a criminal conspiracy, Yes Bank Ltd subscribed to NCDs of M/s RHFL, M/s RCFL and M/s Reliance Capital Limited (RCL).

In return, the agency alleged that the funds available at the disposal of M/s Reliance Nippon Mutual Fund, invested in YBL AT-1 bonds and AMC also invested in Rana Kapoor’s family firm.

Thus, funds available with Reliance Nippon Mutual Funds were routed to the group companies of ADA through Yes Bank, CBI claimed, adding that the funds were further diverted to other shell companies.

The agency has alleged that it all started with the meeting held between Rana Kapoor and Anil Ambani on October 6, 2017, just a month before the Reliance Nippon Life Asset Management Limited (AMC) was listed with BSE and NSE on November 6, 2017.

The agency pointed out that “the abnormal decision of YBL to make huge investment in the NCDs of the financial companies of ADA Group and the abnormal decision of the AMC to make huge investment in the YBL AT-1 Bonds were taken in this meeting. Both the investment decisions were taken in a hasty manner and without holding any discussion between the officers of YBL and the officers of the AMC.”

It is claimed that on October 6, 2017 it was Friday, hence the following working day that is on October 9, 2017, the process began. The agency claimed that on October 9, 2017, Kapoor instructed senior executives of IFIB for initiating the proposal for investing in NCDs worth Rs 2900 crores in three ADA group companies – RHFL, RCFL and RCL. The agency claimed that the investment transaction was completed and funds were transferred on October 13, 2017.

On the other hand, AMC, allegedly under the influence of Anil Ambani, prepared a formal note for increasing the long-term debt investment limit in M/s Morgan Credits Private Limited (MCPL), a firm owned by Radha and Roshini, from Rs 550 crores to Rs 625 crores. Accordingly in ten days AMC invested Rs 50 crores in MCPL.

Meanwhile, on October 9, 2017, Yes Bank initiated the process for issuance of fresh AT-1 bond under the instructions of Rana Kapoor, even when the DCM team of the bank had raised apprehension for arranging subscribers for making investment in fresh YBL AT 1 bonds in such a span, wherein they were still busy in offloading earlier bonds in secondary market, CBI alleged.

However, CBI claimed that Rana Kapoor had informed them that Reliance Nippon Mutual fund would make an investment of Rs 2000 crores through private placement and Rs 1000 crores secondary market in YBL AT 1 bond.

The agency claimed that AMC had enhanced the sub limit for YBL AT – 1 bond by about 600% in a short span of time, as compared to the sub-limit of other banks which was at max enhanced to 70%.

Continue Reading

Trending