New Delhi, May 12: The half-burnt portrait of Asif Ali Zardari from the smouldering debris of Rahimyar Khan air base is a symbolic devastation of the image of Pakistan as Operation Sindoor marked a significant demonstration of India’s military and strategic prowess through a blend of military and non-military means.

The extent of Pakistan being punished through both means is now quite clear.

The multi-dimensional operation successfully neutralized terrorist threats, deterred Pakistani aggression, and reinforced India’s zero-tolerance policy toward terrorism, all while maintaining strategic restraint and international support.

As far as the military measures are concerned, India employed a range of precise and deliberate military actions to achieve its objectives.

The Indian Armed Forces carried out coordinated precision missile strikes on nine terrorist facilities—four in Pakistan (including Bahawalpur and Muridke) and five in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (such as Muzaffarabad and Kotli). These facilities were key command centers for Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), responsible for attacks like Pulwama (2019) and Mumbai (2008).

In response to Pakistan’s retaliatory drone and missile attacks from May 7-9 that targetted multiple Indian cities and military installations, India launched kamikaze drones to destroy Pakistani air defences across the country, including neutralising the air defence system of Lahore.

India’s air defence system proved instrumental in neutralising all incoming threats, resulting in near zero casualties or material losses, and exposing flaws in Pakistan’s HQ-9 system. The counter military actions on the night of May 9 and 10 also became the first instance of a country damaging air force camps of a nuclear country.

Within three hours, 11 bases were attacked including Nur Khan, Rafiqui, Murid, Sukkur, Sialkot, Pasrur, Chunian, Sargodha, Skardu, Bholari and Jacobabad.

The scale of destruction was clearly visible in the before and after photos of Shahbaz airbase at Jacobabad.

In the strikes, various ammunition depots and bases like Sargodha and Bholari that housed F-16s and JF-17 fighter jets were hit. This led to destruction of 20 per cent infrastructure of Pakistan’s air force.

India bombed Pakistan’s Bholari Air Base, killing over 50 people including Pakistan’s squadron leader Usman Yousuf, four airmen among others as well as destroying Pakistan’s fighter jets.

Over the course of Operation Sindoor, multiple terror and military locations across Pakistan were attacked by India. Along the LoC, following Pakistani artillery and mortar shelling in the Poonch-Rajouri sector that targetted civilian areas, Indian troops responded with calibrated counterfire destroying terrorist bunkers and Pakistani army’s positions to target civilians.

When it comes to the non-military measures, India’s non-kinetic efforts were equally significant in shaping the strategic environment and ensuring public and international support. India leveraged strategic policy decisions, information dominance, and psychological operations to isolate Pakistan economically and diplomatically, while bolstering domestic readiness and international support.

India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) under Operation Sindoor was a decisive move with far-reaching consequences. Pakistan, as the lower riparian, depends on the Indus system for 80 per cent of its 16 million hectares of farmland and 93 per cent of its total water use — sustaining 237 million people and driving a quarter of its GDP through crops like wheat, rice, and cotton.

With just 10 per cent live storage capacity (14.4 MAF) at Mangla and Tarbela dams, any disruption in flows threatens catastrophic agricultural losses, food shortages, water rationing in major cities, and rolling blackouts that would cripple industries, including textiles and fertilizers. These shocks could trigger a broader fiscal and foreign exchange crisis in an already fragile economy.

For India, the treaty had long constrained infrastructure development in Jammu and Kashmir, limiting it to run-of-the-river projects. Its suspension allows India full control over western rivers like Jhelum and Chenab — enabling new reservoirs, boosting irrigation and hydropower in Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Punjab, and Haryana, and transforming a diplomatic tool into a developmental advantage.

By suspending this, India gave decisive message that water and blood cannot flow together.

India closed the Attari-Wagah border and suspended all bilateral trade with Pakistan, halting exports of key goods such as onions and restricting imports like cement and textiles. This decision severed the primary land-based trade route between the two countries.

The suspension imposed immediate economic costs on Pakistan, already grappling with inflation and debt. By choking off these economic lifelines without engaging in direct military escalation, India reinforced its zero-tolerance stance while avoiding full-scale conflict.

India also cancelled the visas of all Pakistanis living in India and sent them back in the immediate aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack showing strong resolve against terrorism. The imposition of a complete ban on Pakistani artists, halting performances, screenings, music releases, and cultural collaborations also extended to streaming platforms, cutting off Pakistan’s cultural influence in India.

India exposed Pakistan’s terror ecosystem globally and isolated Pakistan diplomatically. These steps imposed tangible economic and diplomatic costs. Collectively, these actions deepened Pakistan’s isolation and reaffirmed India’s commitment to a zero-tolerance stance on terrorism.

New Delhi, May 12: Pakistan has tried to debunk the fact that Hafiz Abdur Rauf, who led the funeral of terrorists killed in the recent Operation Sindoor strikes, is a US-designated global terrorist and senior Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) leader, terming him as “a common family man”.

Behind Abdur Rauf, high-ranking Pakistani military officers stood in solemn attendance, and coffins draped in Pakistan’s national flag underscored what Indian officials called the state’s overt support for terrorism.

At a press briefing in New Delhi, Indian officials shared a photograph of Rauf leading the funeral procession, accompanied by Pakistan Army officers in uniform.

The image has since gone viral, sparking widespread debate and outrage. Rauf, who is the brother of Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) chief Masood Azhar, is a US Treasury-designated Specially Designated Global Terrorist under OFAC sanctions, with a known history of managing LeT finances and propaganda.

Pakistan’s military attempted to downplay the revelation, with the DGISPR describing Rauf as a “common family man” and a “preacher”. His national identity card was presented to the media in an effort to portray him as a non-combatant.

However, official documentation — including Rauf’s CNIC number (35202-5400413-9) and birthdate (March 25, 1973) — matched those listed in the US sanctions.

During a recent media briefing on Operation Sindoor, Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri questioned Pakistan’s narrative while holding the damning photo, stating, “They claim that only civilians were killed in the strikes on the 7th of May. We have made the point very clearly that all attacks on the morning of 7th May were against carefully selected terrorist infrastructure, terrorist targets?”

The Pakistani military has also tried to confuse the issue by conflating Hafiz Abdur Rauf with Abdul Rauf Azhar, another of Masood Azhar’s brothers and a senior Jaish-e-Mohammed commander, who was reportedly eliminated in Operation Sindoor.

They questioned how someone declared dead by India could lead a funeral later the same day. However, the two are separate individuals, both on international watchlists, and both deeply embedded in the terror ecosystem of Pakistan.

Rauf Azhar, JeM’s operations chief, was a key planner of the 1999 IC-814 hijacking and played a central role in the 2001 Parliament attack, 2016 Pathankot airbase strike, and 2019 Pulwama bombing.

Meanwhile, the presence of Pakistani top brass at the funeral further reinforced allegations of institutional support for terrorists.

Among those in attendance were Lt Gen Fayyaz Hussain Shah, Corps Commander, IV Corps, Lahore; Maj Gen Rao Imran Sartaj, GOC, 11 Infantry Division; Brig Mohammad Furqan Shabbir, Commander, 15 Hybrid Mechanised Brigade; Punjab IGP Dr Usman Anwar; and Punjab MLA Malik Sohaib Ahmed Bherth.

According to the US Treasury, Hafiz Abdur Rauf worked directly under LeT chief Hafiz Saeed, managing fundraising and training operations. He has also been a key figure in Falah-e-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF), a LeT front posing as a charity but used to finance terrorist activities.

Both FIF and Rauf were sanctioned by the US on November 24, 2010, following Indian intelligence inputs post the 26/11 Mumbai attacks.

The visuals from Muridke — where the funeral was held — depict a state ceremony, not a private religious service.

“It is not clear to us, in fact, seeing some of the coverage of the aftereffects of these strikes, including the funerals for the terrorists that were held yesterday. I think a lot of you have seen the reports and the coverage in the media. If only civilians, or if any civilians were killed in these attacks, I wonder what message this picture actually sends to all of you. This is a question that is worth asking,” Misri had said while holding a photograph that showed UN-proscribed Pakistani terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba’s top Commander Hafiz Abdur Rauf leading the funeral prayers of LeT terrorists killed in Indian airstrikes in Muridke on Wednesday.

The fallout is another example of how Pakistan shields designated terror groups and fosters terrorism.

Mumbai, May 12: The Shiv Sena(UBT) has strongly expressed displeasure over the US President Donald Trump’s ‘intervention’ in the India-Pakistan conflict and his announcement of a ceasefire.

In a scathing editorial in its mouthpiece ‘Saamana’, the Shiv Sena(UBT) asked, “Who gave the President authority? Did President Trump buy India’s sovereignty? In exchange for what? Exactly, “What deal was made? The country must know.”

“The Indian Army and Air Force have foiled the drones and missiles launched by Pakistan against India. They have given a befitting reply to the Pakistanis, but while doing all this, the exact whereabouts of the six terrorists who carried out the Pahalgam attack have not been traced. The trigger for the India-Pak conflict was the killing of 26 innocent people by six terrorists. But President Trump has poured water. President Trump wants peace to prevail between India and Pakistan. He is not Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, or Nelson Mandela. He is a businessman. The ruling businessmen of India have joined hands with the businessmen of America. President Trump has not stopped the Israel-Palestine war. By directly supporting Israel, he watches the deaths of the people of Gaza and preaches peace to India,” said the editorial.

“India is a sovereign and independent nation. No outside country has the right to interfere in our nation, but US President Trump has intervened in the India-Pakistan conflict, and India has accepted Trump’s ceasefire proposal. Trump announced on his ‘X’ account that India has accepted the ceasefire. Till then, the people of India and the Indian Army were not aware of this ceasefire. Who gave President Trump this authority?” asked the Shiv Sena(UBT) in the editorial.

“According to the Simla Agreement signed between the two nations after the 1971 Indo-Pak war, a third nation was not allowed to intervene in the conflict between the two nations. However, now the Prime Minister of India has violated the Simla Agreement. India succumbed to Trump’s pressure and ratified the ceasefire, but was ‘Operation Sindoor’ or Pakistan’s revenge completed? The country has not received an answer to this,” said the editorial.

“Twelve innocent civilians were killed in the Pakistani attack in Poonch-Rajouri. What was their mistake? Prime Minister Modi was so eager that amid the conflict between India and Pakistan, there was no turning back. Just as Modi’s eagerness was generating new energy in the country and the army, President Trump struck a deal. Seven Indian soldiers died in the Pakistani attack. One of them is Murali Naik from Mumbai, and this young martyr is only 23 years old. Murali Naik and Dinesh Sharma died while responding to Pakistani firing in the Uri sector. Dinesh Sharma is also a young soldier. He fought with Pakistan in the Poonch sector. He showed unparalleled bravery for the country and made the supreme sacrifice of his life to protect Mother India. Thousands of such Dinesh Sharmas and Murali Naiks are fighting on the Indian border and are taking bullets in their chests. Murali Naik’s parents live in a slum in Ghatkopar. They work hard to run their household. The only son of Mother India, he was martyred while fighting on the country’s border to protect it. Murali’s father said, “I am proud that my son has come to serve the country,” but in the end, he will be sad that his stomach has been emptied. Those who have been swept up in the political frenzy of war should remember this,” said the editorial.

“Those who have been charged up due to the political frenzy of war have never sacrificed for the country, nor have they shown any bravery, but the propaganda is going on as if this war is being fought by the Bharatiya Janata Party and its own people. The government has closed down news agencies and a few channels. Even after the ceasefire game has started, the Defence Minister is raking up Operation Sindoor. However, the basic questions still remain that is, how did those six terrorists come and how did they disappear? Why was their whereabouts not known? These questions will be asked. Seven terrorists of the terrorist organisation. Jaish-e-Mohammed, who tried to infiltrate into India from the Samba sector in Jammu on Thursday midnight, were killed by the brave jawans of the Border Security Force. These same soldiers destroyed the outpost on the Pakistani border. This is commendable and every Indian citizen should know,” said the editorial.

“Pakistan is standing firm, and the Pakistani Prime Minister has rubbed salt in the wounds of 26 sisters who were left destitute in the Pahalgam attack by claiming that ‘we won the war’. While all this is happening, the Prime Minister, Defence Minister, and Home Minister are nowhere to be seen. Before the war started, Home Minister Amit Shah had said in Parliament that Pakistan-occupied Kashmir is a part of India. We will even give our lives for it, but when the Indian Army moved forward to take Kashmir, Modi-Shah simply accepted the ceasefire and surrendered to President Trump. Have the sacrifices of seven soldiers in the conflict with Pakistan gone in vain?” asked the Shiv Sena (UBT).

“One should be proud of the action. If the infiltration of seven Jaish terrorists on the Indian border is stopped and they are killed, then how were the terrorists who entered the tourist spot of Pahalgam and attacked indiscriminately allowed to enter? How were they left free? How were they allowed to wipe the vermilion of 26 sisters, and what happened to them after doing this? These questions arise,” said the editorial.