Connect with us
Saturday,04-April-2026
Breaking News

Business

Supertech stares at insolvency amid heat of twin-tower demolition

Published

on

A couple of years ago, real estate firm Supertech Ltd was gaining steam with several thousand apartments in Delhi-NCR.

It advertised extensively and the firm was among the top in the real estate sector. Then in 2020 came the Covid pandemic, which turned everything upside down and created an unprecedented crisis for the real estate industry.

As things begin to normalise, it seems normalcy has reached beyond the reach of Supertech with the company receiving a twofold blow.

First, in August last year, the Supreme Court ordered demolition of its two 40-storey towers in Noida, and in March this year, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) declared Supertech as insolvent while admitting a plea filed by the Union Bank of India (UBI) over non-payment of its dues.

In August 2021, the apex court ordered demolition of the twin towers in Sector 93, Noida, within three months, and also directed that the entire amount of homebuyers should be refunded with 12 per cent interest from the time of booking.

Supertech fought a long and draining legal battle to protect its twin towers — having over 900 flats and 21 shops — against demolition, which had been ordered for violation of building bylaws.

It filed a plea in the apex court seeking to save one tower and partially demolish 224 units in the other to conform with building bylaws. However, in October last year, the top court junked the plea by Supertech seeking extension of time for payment of compensation to homebuyers and demolition of twin towers.

Finally, the fate of its twin towers was sealed on February 7, when the apex court directed the authorities to commence the process for demolition of towers within two weeks.

The Noida authority informed the apex court that the demolition will be completed by May 22, and the debris will be removed by August 22.

The past few of months have been dramatic for the real estate company. In January, the Supreme Court pulled up the realty major for not complying with its orders to demolish the twin towers. The top court warned “its directors will be sent to jail for playing truant with the court”, and also took serious note of the deductions in refund made to the homebuyers.

Another jolt hit Supertech when the NCLT in March approved UBI’s application to begin corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) against the realty major for non-payment of around Rs 432 crore worth dues.

Supertech is supposed to deliver nearly 25,000 units to homebuyers in 50 projects, which are spread across Noida, Greater Noida, Yamuna Expressway, Ghaziabad and Gurugram, among other cities.

The NCLT appointed Hitesh Goyal as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), superseding the board of Supertech. One of the promoters of Supertech moved the NCLAT, challenging the NCLT order.

Earlier this week, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) gave the real estate firm one more opportunity to settle its dispute with the Union Bank of India. The bank took the real estate firm to the insolvency court after it failed to pay its debt since July 2019.

The NCLAT extended its stay over formation of a committee of creditors (COC) to overtake Supertech till May 2, after a counsel for a director of the suspended board of Supertech sought one more chance to present a better proposal before the lender bank.

The Union Bank of India counsel had contended that it has received an offer, but it has been rejected on various grounds. The bank’s counsel said it did not mention paying any upfront amount and the tenure of repayment was 24 months, and insisted that Supertech should come up with a definite upfront payment plan for the dues.

On April 4, the Supreme Court said it will protect the interest of Supertech’s twin-tower homebuyers in the backdrop of the appointment of an IRP in the insolvency proceedings against the real estate firm.

According to a note filed by advocate Gaurav Agarwal, amicus curiae in the matter, NCLT passed an order on March 25, 2022, by which corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) has been initiated against Supertech and moratorium under Section 14 of IB Code, 2016, has been declared.

Agarwal urged the top court to consider whether payments to be made to the remaining homebuyers of the twin towers should form part of the resolution process or whether the payments should be made by the company from the funds available (or which may become available in future), i.e., the said payments be kept out of the CIRP process?

Also, in case the payments are part of the CIRP process, will the amounts due to the homebuyers be included as a separate category in the proposed resolution plans so that homebuyers get the refund with interest from the successful resolution applicant?

The top court said it will protect the interest of homebuyers in the Supertech’s twin towers in Noida. It said that homebuyers should file their claims with the IRP and seek response from the IRP on the disbursal of their claims.

A note submitted in the top court by Agarwal said: “As per the information given by Supertech Ltd, out of 711 customers/units, the claims of 652 customers/units are settled/paid. Fifty-nine homebuyers still have to be refunded the amounts. The principal outstanding would be Rs 14.96 crore.”

The apex court is likely to next hear the matter in the first week of May.

Business

Taxes, margins eat half of Pakistan’s petrol price, consumers cry: Report

Published

on

New Delhi, April 4: Pakistani consumers are bearing almost half of petrol’s retail cost in the form of government levies and industry profit margins, an internal government document has revealed, coming just a day after a massive increase in the prices of both petrol and diesel was announced, a report said.

Petroleum Minister Ali Pervaiz Malik, speaking alongside Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb at a press briefing, announced a Rs 137.23-per-litre rise in petrol prices, pushing the retail rate to Rs 458.41 per litre.

Moreover, high-speed diesel climbed even more steeply, up Rs 184.49 per litre to a new benchmark of Rs 520.35.

Both hikes were attributed to disruptions in the global oil supply chain stemming from the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

The Ministry of Energy’s pricing document lays bare a cost structure that places the ex-refinery price of petrol at Rs 247.15 per litre — less than the Rs 211.26 per litre piled on through taxes and margins.

Of that non-product portion, a petroleum levy alone accounts for Rs 160.61 per litre, followed by Rs 24.12 in customs duty and Rs 2.50 under the climate support levy.

The inland freight margin adds another Rs 7.52, while oil marketing companies (OMCs) collect Rs 7.87 in profit and pump dealers retain an Rs 8.64 commission per litre.

The picture is markedly different for diesel consumers. The ex-refinery price of high-speed diesel stands at Rs 461.23 per litre, and, unlike petrol, diesel currently attracts no petroleum levy.

In addition, combined taxes and margins on diesel total Rs 59.12 per litre — 11.36 per cent of the retail price — comprising Rs 35.74 in customs duty, Rs 4.37 for inland freight, Rs 7.87 in OMC profit, Rs 8.64 for dealers, and the Rs 2.50 climate levy.

The disclosures have drawn fresh scrutiny to the government’s fiscal strategy, with petrol’s tax-and-margin share more than four times that of diesel, even as pump prices for both fuels reach record highs.

Continue Reading

Business

Iran-Israel Conflict Hits India’s Real Estate: Supply Disruptions & Rising Costs Delay Project Possessions

Published

on

Mumbai: The ongoing geopolitical tensions in West Asia, particularly the Iran–Israel conflict, have The ongoing geopolitical tensions in West Asia, particularly the Iran-Israel conflict, have begun to weigh on India’s real estate sector. Developers are flagging delays in project completion due to supply chain disruptions and rising input costs.

Industry stakeholders said shortages of key finishing materials such as tiles and sanitaryware, driven largely by gas supply constraints, are emerging as a critical concern. These disruptions are expected to push possession timelines, especially for projects in advanced stages.

CREDAI-MCHI Chief Operating Officer Keval Valambhia noted that the war has led to significant supply-side challenges. Shortages of gas and LPG have impacted the production of energy-intensive materials like supply of tiles from Morbi, which supplies over 80% of the market need. “Distributors have increased prices due to limited availability, but the situation remains manageable currently,” Valam bhia said. He warned that if the conflict continues, project possession timelines could extend by two to three months.

The marble and tile industry has been hit particularly hard. Gajendra Bhandari, President of the Vile Parle Marble Association, said that nearly 80% of factories have shut down. According to Bhandari, major firms are now insisting on full advance payments and have stopped accepting new orders without prior confirmation.

Deep Vadodaria, CEO of Nila Spaces, explained that the conflict affects projects at multiple levels. Beyond finishing materials like façade glass, core inputs like steel and cement are witnessing price pressure due to rising crude oil prices. Vadodaria described this as an indirect “wartax” on the sector, where developers deal with both cost escalations and procurement uncertainty.

Anand Gupta, a member of the Builders Association of India, said the availability of sanitaryware is hampered by chemical supply issues.

Continue Reading

Business

CBI files case against Anil Ambani, RCom in Rs 3,750 crore LIC case

Published

on

New Delhi, April 1: The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday registered a case against Reliance Communications Ltd (RCom), Anil Ambani, unknown public servants, and unknown others on allegations of causing wrongful loss of Rs 3,750 crore to Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India.

The case has been registered on the basis of a complaint received from Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd. for offences of conspiracy, cheating, misappropriation, and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, according to an official statement.

It is alleged that LIC was fraudulently induced to subscribe to Non Convertible Debentures (NCDs) worth Rs 4,500 crore on the basis of false representations made by Reliance Communications Ltd. and its management regarding the financial health of the company, and security and asset cover offered to LIC while subscribing to the NCDs.

The LIC has made this complaint on basis of a forensic audit report dated October 15, 2020 conducted by BDO India LLP, which reported that RCom and its management had resorted to misutilisation of funds raised from banks and financial institutions, routing of funds through subsidiaries, misuse of sale invoice financing, discounting of fictitious bills, systematic siphoning of funds through inter-company deposits and shell related entities, creating and write-off of fictitious debtors and receivables and gross overstatement of security. There was a mismatch between the charges and the assets.

Investigation of the case is in progress, the statement added.

The CBI had earlier registered three cases against RCom Ltd, Anil Ambani, and others on allegations of defrauding a number of banks.

Anil Ambani was also interrogated by the CBI at its head office in Delhi for two days in a row in connection with the alleged Rs 2,929.05 crore SBI fraud case.

The CBI had registered an FIR on August 21, 2025, following a complaint filed by the SBI, in which Reliance Communications Limited, Anil D. Ambani and others, including unknown public servants, are accused.

The State Bank of India (SBI) is the lead bank in the consortium of 11 banks — Bank of India, Central Bank of India, UCO Bank, Union Bank of India, e-Corporation Bank, Canara Bank, e-Syndicate Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank Limited, and e-Oriental Bank of Commerce that had extended loans to the Anil Ambani group.

The complaint is based on a forensic audit report that alleges large-scale diversion and misutilisation of loan funds through interlinked and circuitous transactions among group entities during the period 2013-17, resulting in wrongful loss of Rs 2929.05 crore to the SBI out of total exposure of Rs 19, 694.33 crores involving 17 public sector banks, according to an official statement.

Subsequent to the registration of the case, separate complaints were received from the Punjab National Bank, the Bank of India, the Union Bank of India, the UCO Bank, the Central Bank of India, the IDBI Bank, and the Bank of Maharashtra. Further, another case has been registered against Reliance Communications Limited, Anil Ambani and others unknown, including unknown public servants, on February 25 on the basis of a complaint dated February 24, received from the Bank of Baroda, which includes exposure of e-Dena Bank and e-Vijaya Bank.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending