National News
Places of Worship Act: Mathura mosque committee urges SC to close Centre’s right to file counter affidavit
New Delhi, Jan 21: In a fresh application filed before the Supreme Court, the Committee of Management of Mathura’s Shahi Masjid Eidgah has pleaded that the right of the Centre to file its reply to the petitions challenging the validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991 should be closed.
The plea said that in an order passed on December 12, 2024, the apex court noticed that the Union government had not filed its reply to the petitions challenging the 1991 Act for over three years and directed that a common counter affidavit be filed by the Centre within four weeks.
The mosque committee said that the Union of India is “deliberately” not filing its counter affidavit with the intention to delay the hearing, and thereby, obstructing those who are opposing the challenge to the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 in filing their respective written submissions, as the stand of the Centre would have a bearing on the same.
The Shahi Masjid Eidgah’s application contended that since the Supreme Court has fixed the date of hearing of the batch of petition as February 17, “it would be in the interest of justice if the right of the Union of India to file its counter affidavit/ reply/pleadings/submissions is closed”.
In March 2021, a Bench headed by then Chief Justice of India (CJI) S.A. Bobde sought the Centre’s response to the plea filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay challenging the validity of certain provisions of the law, prohibiting the filing of a lawsuit to reclaim a place of worship or seek a change in its character from what prevailed on August 15, 1947.
The plea said, “The 1991 Act was enacted in the garb of ‘Public order’, which is a State subject (Schedule-7, List-II, Entry-1) and ‘places of pilgrimages within India’ is also State subject (Schedule-7, List-II, Entry-7). So, the Centre can’t enact the Law.
“Moreover, Article 13(2) prohibits the State from making a law to take away fundamental rights but the 1991 Act takes away the rights of Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs, to restore their ‘places of worship and pilgrimages’, destroyed by barbaric invaders.”
It further added, “The Act excludes the birthplace of Lord Rama but includes the birthplace of Lord Krishna, though both are incarnations of Lord Vishnu, the creator and equally worshipped throughout the world, hence it is arbitrary.”
In an interim order passed on December 12, 2024, the CJI Sanjiv Khanna-led Special Bench had ordered that no fresh suits would be registered under the Places of Worship Act in the country, and in the pending cases, no final or effective orders would be passed till further orders.
The Special Bench, also comprising Justices Sanjay Kumar and K.V. Viswanathan, had asked the Union government to file within four weeks its reply to the batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Places of Worship Act (Special Provisions), 1991.
In an intervention application filed earlier on December 11, the Committee of Management of Mathura’s Shahi Masjid Eidgah, had said that the 1991 law, prohibiting the alteration of religious places of worship as they stood on August 15, 1945, was enacted by Parliament in the interest of the country’s progress, which has stood the test of time for more than 33 years.
It added that Parliament had enacted the 1991 Act, which has stood the test of time for more than 33 years and the petitioners have chosen to challenge the enactment belatedly, after 29 years.
The application said that the mosque committee is party to 17 different suits being tried by the Allahabad High Court, where the plaintiffs have staked a claim over the entire parcel of land over which the Shahi Masjid Eidgah has been built, and have further sought the removal of the mosque structure from the said land, claiming the same to have been built over Krishna Janam Sthan.
“It would be in the interest of justice if the applicant (mosque committee) is allowed to intervene and assist this Hon’ble Court in the adjudication of the issues (relating to the validity of Places of Worship Act, 1991),” the application had said.
National News
As 6 MPs of Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena-UBT set to join Shinde faction, Sanjay Raut unveils legal action plan

New Delhi, June 18: As six out of the party’s nine Lok Sabha MPs are on the verge of defecting to Deputy Chief Minister Ekanth Shinde-led Shiv Sena, the Shiv Sena-UBT leadership has moved into high alert.
The Shiv Sena-UBT has initiated a strict legal strategy to corner the rebel MPs and seek their disqualification.
The political tremor became evident during a crucial Parliamentary Party meeting convened by the Uddhav Thackeray-led faction in Delhi on Thursday.
Despite a strict party whip, only three Lok Sabha MPs attended, virtually confirming a vertical split in the Parliamentary wing.
Addressing a press conference following the high-stakes meeting, Shiv Sena-UBT Rajya Sabha MP and Chief Spokesperson Sanjay Raut said those who were present at the meeting included Arvind Sawant (Mumbai South), Anil Desai (Mumbai South-Central) and Rajabhau Waje (Nashik).
However, six MPs skipped the meeting including Omraje Nimbalkar (Dharashiv), Sanjay Jadhav (Parbhani), Sanjay Deshmukh (Yavatmal-Washim), Nagesh Ashtikar (Hingoli), Bhausaheb Wakchaure (Shirdi) and Sanjay Dina Patil (Mumbai North-East).
Raut announced that the Shiv Sena-UBT has already initiated disciplinary and legal procedures to create a blockade for the defecting MPs.
“Only three of our Lok Sabha MPs attended the Parliamentary Party meeting today. We have issued official ‘Show-Cause Notices’ to all the absent lawmakers, giving them a strict timeline of seven days to submit their explanations,” he said.
Emphasising that the Shiv Sena-UBT will fight on all fronts, Raut added, “We will fight this battle on the streets, and we will fight it in the courts. Our ground preparation to ensure their disqualification has begun in full swing.”
The Shiv Sena-UBT leader laid down the legal roadmap that the Uddhav Thackeray-led faction intends to pursue over the coming weeks, shifting the spotlight onto the anti-defection framework.
“The party (Shiv Sena-UBT) will first exhaust all internal Constitutional and legislative processes within the Lower House of Parliament. If the Lok Sabha Speaker (Om Birla) acts in accordance with the rules, the law, and the strict guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court of India, these six MPs will inevitably face disqualification,” he asserted.
“If the legislative process fails to yield a fair resolution, the Uddhav Thackeray-led faction is prepared to challenge the matter directly before the Supreme Court,” Raut said.
Political circles in Maharashtra are abuzz with speculation that the six rebel MPs might officially join Eknath Shinde’s faction around June 19, coinciding with the Shiv Sena’s Foundation Day.
The next seven days will be crucial as the political battle moves from internal party notices to a full-blown Constitutional showdown.
Crime
Villagers protest after youth’s death in encounter in Bihar’s Bhojpur; family questions police action

Patna, June 18: Tension gripped Bilauti village in Bihar’s Bhojpur district on Thursday after the death of Bharat Bhushan Tiwari, who succumbed to injuries sustained during a police encounter a day earlier.
The incident has triggered widespread protests, with family members and villagers alleging that the police used excessive force and demanding an impartial investigation.
Bharat Bhushan Tiwari was injured during an encounter on Wednesday when a joint team of the Shahpur police and the Special Task Force (STF) attempted to arrest him following reports that he had been brandishing a firearm and allegedly firing at police personnel.
He was initially taken to Shahpur Referral Hospital before being referred to Patna Medical College and Hospital (PMCH), where he later died during treatment.
However, the deceased’s family has strongly disputed the police version of events.
Speaking amid the protests, Bharat Bhushan’s mother questioned the circumstances of the encounter and accused the police of shooting her son despite his surrender.
“My son was dedicated to social welfare. He had surrendered, yet the police shot him. Why was he shot after surrendering?” she asked.
She further claimed that her son had been influenced by others and was not the owner of any licensed firearm.
“He had a hot temper, but someone from the village gave him the pistol and misled him. He surrendered, yet they fired five shots at him,” she alleged.
The grieving mother also described her son as someone who frequently helped people in the village and said the family was struggling to understand why such action was taken against him.
Anger over the incident spilled onto the streets as hundreds of villagers gathered near Bilauti village and blocked the Ara-Buxar four-lane highway.
Protesters placed the deceased’s body on the road and raised slogans against the police administration.
Witnesses estimated that between 1,000 and 1,500 people participated in the demonstration, causing major traffic disruptions and long queues of vehicles on both sides of the highway.
Villagers alleged that the encounter was staged and questioned the legality of the police action.
“There is no provision for killing a person who is surrendering. If someone wants to surrender in a case, can the police shoot him dead? An impartial inquiry must be conducted,” one protester said.
Another villager claimed that Bharat Bhushan had no criminal background and was known locally for social work.
The controversy comes days after a video allegedly showing Bharat Bhushan Tiwari brandishing a firearm went viral on social media.
According to police, officers initially visited his residence to investigate the video, during which he allegedly threatened personnel with a pistol.
Police stated that when officers returned with STF support to arrest him on Wednesday morning, he opened fire on the team, forcing them to retaliate in self-defence.
The encounter resulted in multiple gunshot injuries to Tiwari.
The incident has already led to departmental action. Following the circulation of videos from the operation, Shahabad Range DIG Dr Satyaprakash ordered the suspension of the Shahpur Station House Officer (SHO), along with a sub-inspector and a constable, citing alleged negligence and lapses in handling the situation.
Following Thursday’s protests, additional police personnel were deployed in the area to maintain law and order.
National News
NEET aspirant dies after falling from 6th floor in Ahmedabad; police probe underway

Ahmedabad, June 18: A 17-year-old NEET aspirant died after falling from the sixth floor of a residential apartment building in Ahmedabad’s New Ranip area, just three days before the nationwide NEET-UG retest scheduled for June 21.
According to Sabarmati Police, the teenager, a student preparing for the medical entrance examination, fell from the balcony area of a flat in Aristo Anandam Apartments.
Police received information about the incident at around 4.30 a.m. on Thursday and reached the scene to begin an investigation.
An accidental death case has been registered under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita pending further inquiry.
The body was sent for post-mortem examination, and an inquiry was conducted to establish the exact cause of death.
Sabarmati Police Inspector Yuvrajsinh Vaghela said the incident occurred during the night.
“The incident occurred around 2-3 a.m. We received the information around 4.30 a.m. No suicide note has been recovered as of now. The cause cannot be ascertained at present, including whether the student was under stress. Investigation is going on,” he told Media.
Police said they are examining the circumstances surrounding the death and are speaking with family members, friends and others known to the student.
No official conclusion has been drawn regarding the reason behind the incident.
The death comes days before the rescheduled National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (Undergraduate), one of India’s largest competitive examinations for admission to medical courses.
The National Testing Agency (NTA) announced the retest after cancelling the original NEET-UG 2026 examination conducted on May 3 following allegations of a paper leak and other irregularities.
The re-examination was approved by the Central government after concerns were raised about the integrity of the test process.
More than 22 lakh candidates were affected by the cancellation, which triggered widespread uncertainty among students and parents across the country.
The NTA has said additional security measures have been introduced for the retest, while the Supreme Court has been informed that strengthened safeguards are in place to protect the integrity of the examination.
In recent days, authorities have intensified preparations for the June 21 examination.
The Indian Air Force has assisted in transporting question papers to multiple locations across the country. The NTA has launched training programmes for examination staff and issued advisories warning students against misinformation and fake paper leak claims circulating online.
Police have not linked the student’s death to the examination, and investigators said the cause of the incident remains under investigation.
-
Crime4 years agoClass 10 student jumps to death in Jaipur
-
Maharashtra2 years agoMumbai Local Train Update: Central Railway’s New Timetable Comes Into Effect; Check Full List Of Revised Timings & Stations
-
Maharashtra2 years agoMumbai To Go Toll-Free Tonight! Maharashtra Govt Announces Complete Toll Waiver For Light Motor Vehicles At All 5 Entry Points Of City
-
Maharashtra2 years agoFalse photo of Imtiaz Jaleel’s rally, exposing the fooling conspiracy
-
National News2 years agoMinistry of Railways rolls out Special Drive 4.0 with focus on digitisation, cleanliness, inclusiveness and grievance redressal
-
Maharashtra2 years agoMaharashtra Elections 2024: Mumbai Metro & BEST Services Extended Till Midnight On Voting Day
-
National News2 years agoJ&K: 4 Jawans Killed, 28 Injured After Bus Carrying BSF Personnel For Poll Duty Falls Into Gorge In Budgam; Terrifying Visuals Surface
-
Crime2 years agoBaba Siddique Murder: Mumbai Police Unable To Get Lawrence Bishnoi Custody Due To Home Ministry Order, Says Report
