Connect with us
Tuesday,20-October-2026
Breaking News

Business

‘IAI’s Disciplinary Committee report can be precedent for ICAI, other institutes’

Published

on

Is the remittance of part of the consultancy fee to the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) by an employee as per service condition a professional misconduct?

Yes says, a Disciplinary Committee set up by the Institute of Actuaries of India (IAI).

The IAI Disciplinary Committee’s decision would also have a bearing on the chartered accountants in a similar position as the Committee’s report was also signed by Uttam Agarwal, then President of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), said a senior accountant.

The ICAI has similar rules for professional misconduct.

K.Subrahmanyam, retired Executive Director (Actuary), IRDAI, has knocked the doors of Telangana High Court seeking justice against IAI Disciplinary Committee declaring him as guilty of professional misconduct.

He also wondered about the IRDAI’s silence on the issue after issuing him the permission in writing and accepting his remittance for several years.

The IAI’s Disciplinary Committee in 2021 had declared Subrahmanyam as guilty of professional misconduct.

The misconduct he was accused of is the payment of a part of his actuarial consulting fee to the IRDAI while in service between 2000-2011 as per his employment condition.

He was allowed to carry on actuarial consulting practice by the IRDAI subject to the condition that he remits 25 per cent of the consulting fees with the regulator.

“I carried on my consulting practice and remitted 25 per cent of the fee to IRDAI between 2000 and 2011,” Subrahmanyam told IANS.

“As a matter of fact, Subrahmanyam had consulted the Government of Nepal and Sri Lanka apart from others,” a retired senior IRDAI official told IANS preferring anonymity.

In 2017, six years after his retirement from IRDAI, Subrahmanyam got a shock as actuary N. Srinivasan made a complaint to IAI against him for professional misconduct – for remitting part of his fees to the IRDAI.

Incidentally, the IAI did not even consider the IRDAI’s former Chairman N. Rangachary’s communication clarifying the issue while setting up a Disciplinary Committee to proceed against Subrahmanyam.

In his letter to IAI President, Rangachary had said: “The ASI (Actuarial Society of India) which controlled your profession and consisted of very few members most of them in employment possibly outside India.”

The IRDAI was engaged seriously in seeing to it that a vibrant actuarial profession was functional. One such move was to permit some actuaries in employment to take up assignments in the area of attestation, he added.

Referring to the initiation of the disciplinary proceedings against, Rangachary said: “As Chairman of the authority (IRDAI) I had permitted him (Subrahmanyam) to engage himself in practice in a limited number of cases but subject to the regulations of the authority. Since there was an interchange between the regulator and the profession, both of whom were in the early growth stage, it was then prescribed that as is normally adopted by both the government and statutory bodies a small percentage was to be remitted to the employer.”

Nevertheless, the IAI Disciplinary Committee declared Subrahmanyam as guilty of misconduct under The Actuaries Act 2006 Section 31 Part I and sub section 2 which reads: “An Actuary in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he pays by way of remuneration to an employee, pays or allows or agrees to pay or allow, directly or indirectly, any share, commission or brokerage in the fees or profits of his professional business, to any person other than a member of the Institute or a partner or a retired partner or the legal representative of a deceased partner.”

The Chartered Accountants Act has an identical provision for professional misconduct.

“If a similar issue happens in another regulatory institution like ICAI, the same action will be taken. This is fortified by the ICAI President signing the IAI Disciplinary Committee report,” P.S.Prabhakar, President, Society of Auditors, told IANS.

Business

Indian stock markets closed on account of Dussehra

Published

on

Indian stock markets will remain closed on Tuesday on account of Dussehra with trading suspended across major segments on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and National Stock Exchange (NSE).

Trading in equities, equity derivatives, securities lending and borrowing (SLB), currency derivatives and interest rate derivatives will remain closed for the day on both exchanges, according to them.

Notably, normal trading on NSE and BSE will resume on Wednesday.

However, the commodity derivatives segment will follow a different schedule. Trading will remain suspended during morning session from 9 am to 5 pm before resuming in evening. The session will continue till 11:30 pm or 11:55 pm depending on contract.

Multi Commodity Exchange of India (MCX) will not remain closed for entire day. Exchange will suspend trading during morning session from 9 am to 5 pm and reopen for evening session from 5 pm.

Investors will be able to trade commodities such as gold, silver, crude oil and base metals during evening session.

Meanwhile, National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange (NCDEX) will remain closed for both sessions on account of Dussehra.

Following Dussehra holiday, three regular trading holidays remain on NSE and BSE calendars for rest of 2026 — November 10, Tuesday, Diwali-Balipratipada; November 24, Tuesday, Prakash Gurpurb Sri Guru Nanak Dev; and December 25, Friday, Christmas.

In addition, exchanges have also scheduled a special Muhurat Trading session for November 8, 2026 on occasion of Diwali Laxmi Pujan. Timings for special session will be announced separately.

Notably, in the last session equity benchmarks closed in negative territory amid selling pressure in the banking and information technology (IT) sector stocks.

Sensex decreased over 850 points or 1 per cent to settle at 73,852.90 on Monday. Similarly, Nifty closed 257.20 points or 1.11 per cent lower at 22,888.95.

Continue Reading

Business

Govt asks Meta to review Facebook and Instagram recommendation systems

Published

on

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has asked technology giant firm Meta to review the content recommendation and ranking systems that power Facebook and Instagram, stepping up regulatory scrutiny of how social media algorithms amplify information in India, according to multiple reports.

In an advisory issued to the company, the ministry had asked Meta to ensure that its recommendation systems do not lead to the disproportionate exposure of users to a single or limited set of narratives and instead provide greater access to diverse, relevant and credible information, according to them.

The ministry also directed Meta to strengthen mechanisms for rapidly identifying, reviewing and escalating content that gains significant reach through recommendation systems when such material has the potential to contribute to public confusion, violence or disruption of public order.

Apart from that, the US-based company has been asked to implement the measures immediately and inform the government of the action taken.

The advisory specifically highlights photographs, videos and graphics related to ongoing public events where the authenticity, timing, location or surrounding circumstances may be unclear.

It calls for additional context where old or unrelated visuals are presented as current, where footage has been selectively edited or where unverified claims are made regarding emergencies, police action or other official measures.

Additionally, this marks the latest escalation in the government’s scrutiny of Meta’s moderation and recommendation systems.

Earlier in August, government officials questioned Meta executives over content recommendation algorithms, deepfakes, synthetic media and safeguards against unlawful content.

Meta has separately tightened content and advertising safeguards following concerns related to child sexual exploitation material.

The company said earlier this month it deployed new AI-driven advertising review systems and removed 5.3 million pieces of child sexual exploitation content in India during January-June 2026, with more than 98% detected proactively.

Continue Reading

Business

Sensex, Nifty open flat amid mixed global cues

Published

on

Domestic equity benchmarks opened on a flat note on Monday tracking mixed global cues and momentum from last week’s gains.

Sensex opened at 74,849.30, up 120.03 points or 0.16 per cent, while Nifty began trading at 23,150.85, up 4.70 points or 0.02 per cent.

Sectorally, Nifty PSU Bank led gains and rose over 1 per cent, followed by Nifty Oil & Gas which surged 0.6 per cent.

In contrast, Nifty Private Bank, Nifty IT and Nifty Chemicals dropped up to 1 per cent.

Market experts said momentum from Nifty’s 2.8 per cent surge last week and good results from banking majors after better-than-expected IT earnings could keep the market resilient.

“However, escalation of tensions in Hormuz and consequent surge in Brent crude to $109 will act as a strong headwind,” according to them.

They further said that attractive large-cap valuations and rupee appreciation turned FII stance slightly positive, though unlikely to sustain at high crude prices. Large-caps outperforming mid and small-caps is likely to continue, with stock-specific action on Q2 results.

For Nifty, immediate support is placed at 22,950–23,000, while resistance is seen at 23,250–23,300, the experts said and added that RSI strengthened to 52.81 above its average of 34.70, while PCR stood at 1.08.

In the previous session on October 16, FIIs turned net buyers after 15 straight sessions of selling, buying equities worth about Rs 1,166 crore, while DIIs ended their 45-session buying streak with net sales of around Rs 3,661 crore.

On commodities, Brent crude traded nearly 2 per cent lower at around $107.76 per barrel, while US WTI declined about 1 per cent to $100.43.

In Asia, markets were mixed. Japan’s Nikkei traded 0.84 per cent lower, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng and South Korea’s KOSPI rose up to 0.83 per cent. Indonesia’s Jakarta Composite fell over 5 per cent.

Continue Reading

Trending