Connect with us
Tuesday,06-October-2026
Breaking News

Crime

I-PAC raid row: ED tells SC it has been ‘terrorised’ in Bengal

Published

on

New Delhi, Feb 18: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) told the Supreme Court on Wednesday that it has been “terrorised” in West Bengal, as the apex court adjourned hearing on its plea accusing the state government and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of interfering in recent search operations at the office of political consultancy firm Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC) and the residence of its co-founder Pratik Jain in Kolkata.

During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the federal anti-money laundering agency, strongly refuted the submission that the ED had “weaponised” its powers.

The remarks came after senior advocate Siddharth Luthra contended that the ED must justify the “weaponisation” of its authority.

“It (ED) has not been weaponised, it has been terrorised,” ASG Raju said.

After Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, the Centre’s second-highest law officer, stated that the ED is likely to file its rejoinder during the day, a Bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and K.V. Viswanathan posted the matter for further hearing on March 18.

The hearing was adjourned last week following a request made due to the ill health of senior advocate Kapil Sibal.

During the brief hearing, SG Mehta, representing the ED, informed the apex court that he had been apprised about Sibal’s inability to appear.

“I can’t oppose on this ground. If it can be kept on 18th February,” the Centre’s second-highest law officer submitted.

Acceding to the request, the Justice Mishra-led Bench had deferred the matter for further hearing on February 18.

The ED has approached the top court seeking directions to register FIRs against Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, the state Director General of Police (DGP), and the Kolkata Police Commissioner, alleging obstruction of lawful duties during the federal agency’s simultaneous search operations.

In her counter-affidavit, Chief Minister Banerjee has denied all allegations of interference and obstruction, asserting that her limited presence on the premises was solely to retrieve confidential and proprietary data belonging to her Trinamool Congress (AITC).

According to the affidavit, CM Banerjee visited Pratik Jain’s residence at Loudon Street and I-PAC’s office in Bidhannagar on January 8, 2026, after receiving information that sensitive political data of the Trinamool was being accessed during the searches. She maintained that the data was “vitally linked to the AITC’s strategy for the upcoming Legislative Assembly election”.

The affidavit stated that when she reached the premises, she “politely requested the officials of the Enforcement Directorate to be allowed to retrieve the Party’s data and the devices they were stored in and files containing prints of the same”.

It further claimed that “the officers of the Enforcement Directorate present thereat did not object to this request and permitted her to retrieve some of these devices and physical files”.

“After she had done so, the Answering Respondent (CM Banerjee) left the premises so as not to inconvenience the officials of the Enforcement Directorate in any way,” the counter affidavit said, adding that the ED’s own panchnamas record that the searches continued thereafter and were conducted “peacefully and in an orderly manner”.

CM Banerjee has also argued that neither the Trinamool nor its officials are accused in the alleged coal scam, and therefore, the ED cannot claim any right to the party’s proprietary data.

The counter affidavit has further accused the ED of acting with mala fide intent, alleging that the searches were carried out in the run-up to the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections and after a prolonged period of inaction.

It has questioned the timing of the operations, claiming they coincided with I-PAC possessing “critical documents”, including a proposed list of candidates for the upcoming polls.

Alleging violations of statutory safeguards under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), the affidavit also states that the ED failed to produce any audio or video recordings of the searches. This, it claimed, raises a “strong presumption” that the searches were clandestine and aimed at accessing confidential political data.

Earlier, on January 15, the Supreme Court had stayed the FIRs registered by the West Bengal Police against ED officials in connection with the searches, and had also directed the preservation of CCTV footage and other digital storage devices containing recordings of the searched premises and the surrounding areas.

Crime

Delhi Police seize 265 kg of illegal firecrackers in South Delhi, one arrested

Published

on

New Delhi, Oct 6: The Anti-Narcotics Squad of Delhi Police’s South District has seized 265 kg of illegal and banned firecrackers and arrested a 39-year-old man for storing and selling them during the festive season.

Acting on specific information regarding the illegal sale and storage of firecrackers, the police team conducted a raid in Madangir on October 5 and recovered a substantial quantity of firecrackers from the premises.

The accused was identified as Vipin Garg, a resident of Neb Sarai, Delhi. He was apprehended from the spot and arrested in connection with the case.

According to the police, the Anti-Narcotics Squad had been maintaining close surveillance over the illegal sale, storage and use of banned firecrackers in the national capital and had been taking strict action against violators.

Following the receipt of the information, the police team verified the input and conducted a raid at the identified premises. During the operation, Garg was found in possession of a large quantity of firecrackers intended for discreet sale during the festive season.

A total of 265 kg of illegal firecrackers was recovered and taken into police possession. A case under relevant sections was registered at Ambedkar Nagar Police Station, following which the accused was arrested.

The operation was conducted by a dedicated police team and was led by Inspector Anuj Chaudhary, under the close supervision of ACP/Operations Balram Beniwal.

The police said further investigation is underway.

The recovery of the banned firecrackers is expected to prevent their illegal sale and potential use during the festive season. Delhi Police said the action reaffirms its commitment to public safety and strict enforcement against the illegal storage and sale of banned firecrackers.

Continue Reading

Business

As large number of mineral transporting trucks lack GPS, TN extends deadline to October 31

Published

on

Chennai, Oct 6: Nearly four out of five trucks registered to transport construction minerals in Tamil Nadu remain without GPS tracking devices, prompting another extension of the installation deadline despite a Madras High Court order aimed at tightening monitoring of mineral movement.

Only 30,000 of the 1.4 lakh trucks registered on the Mineral Management System (MIMAS) portal had vehicle location-tracking devices as of September 30. The remaining 79 per cent are yet to comply with the requirement to cover vehicles carrying M-sand, P-sand and other construction aggregates.

The Geology and Mining Department has now extended the deadline to October 31, following representations from transport associations seeking additional time. The original March 31 deadline had already been extended, while the government had separately announced that vehicles without GPS devices would stop receiving mineral transit passes from September 1.

Linking vehicle trackers to MIMAS is intended to strengthen oversight of mineral transportation by recording where trucks load material and tracking their movement. Such records could help authorities identify supplies originating from unauthorised quarries and investigate illegal extraction and transport violations.

However, the slow rollout has drawn criticism from lorry owners, who have questioned the government’s commitment to enforcing the system. G. Ganesh, general secretary of the Tamil Nadu State Lorry Owners Federation, said the cost of tracking devices had fallen sharply, from Rs 15,000 to Rs 3,700.

He said several vendors could supply more than one lakh devices meeting the AIS-140 standard, arguing that availability should not justify further delays.

The government’s reluctance to implement the requirement raised questions about its resolve to curb illegal mining, he said.

Department officials, however, said the approximately 37 authorised suppliers lacked sufficient stocks to equip all remaining vehicles within a short period.

An official said the latest extension followed requests from several associations. Officials also said action was being taken against people generating fraudulent mineral transit passes with fake QR codes.

A dedicated number for complaints about quarrying violations would soon be introduced and linked to the department’s control room in Chennai.

The enforcement challenge comes amid a substantial gap between construction demand and authorised quarry output.

Official estimates put Tamil Nadu’s average daily requirement for construction aggregates at around 5.25 lakh units, compared with permitted quarry production of only 1.2 lakh units, highlighting the need for closer regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Crime

Karnataka: Convict’s wife’s complaint exposes alleged sexual exploitation, forged SC order release racket

Published

on

Bengaluru, Oct 6: What began with a prisoner’s wife allegedly being sexually exploited by prison officials and ended with her husband walking out of jail on the strength of a forged Supreme Court order took a further turn on Tuesday after the convict allegedly abandoned her and married another woman.

This prompted the wife to write a detailed complaint to the Prison Department, which brought the alleged conspiracy to light, police said on Tuesday.

The Parappana Agrahara police in Bengaluru have arrested life convict Shankar A. and prison employee Srikanth S., while Prison Department North Zone DIG Somashekar has also been arrested in connection with the alleged forgery and illegal release of the prisoner from Bengaluru Central Prison in 2018.

Police said the case surfaced after Shankar’s wife, who had been visiting the prison while her husband was serving his life sentence, wrote to the Prison Department after he was released and allegedly deserted her to marry another woman. In her complaint, she reportedly detailed the alleged sexual exploitation by prison officials and the circumstances surrounding her husband’s release.

According to police, Srikanth, who was then working as a Second Division Assistant (SDA) and is now a First Division Assistant in the Convict Prisoner Section, allegedly sexually exploited the woman and later helped fabricate a Supreme Court order to facilitate Shankar’s release.

During the investigation, the woman’s statement also allegedly revealed the involvement of Somashekar, who was serving as Chief Superintendent/DIG at the time. Police said Somashekar allegedly made video calls to the woman and asked her to strip. Investigators have obtained the purported video and sent it to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) for examination.

Police said the woman had become acquainted with Somashekar during her visits to the prison. He allegedly offered to help her secure her husband’s release and subsequently exploited her. Srikanth allegedly joined the effort and helped prepare the forged court document.

The police investigation began following a complaint filed by Karna B. Kshetri, Superintendent-in-Charge of Central Prison, Bengaluru, on May 20. The complaint alleged that Shankar had fabricated a copy of a Supreme Court order and falsely claimed that he had been released on November 13, 2018, on the basis of the purported order.

A case was registered at Parappana Agrahara Police Station under Sections 465, 468, 471 and 420 of the IPC.

Police found that Shankar had been convicted in a case registered at Chikkapet Police Station under Sections 364(A) and 120(B) of the IPC. The Fast Track Court-I, in its judgment dated July 12, 2004, had sentenced him to life imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 10,000. His conviction and sentence were subsequently upheld by the Karnataka High Court and the Supreme Court.

According to the investigation, Srikanth allegedly fabricated a copy of a purported Supreme Court order relating to a criminal appeal petition dated November 2, 2018. Based on the forged document, Shankar was released from Central Prison on November 13, 2018.

Shankar and Srikanth were arrested and produced before a court, which remanded them to judicial custody. Somashekar was subsequently arrested and remanded to police custody till October 9 for further questioning and investigation.

Police are examining Somashekar’s alleged role in the sexual exploitation of the convict’s wife and in the circumstances surrounding Shankar’s release in detail. Investigators are also probing whether similar forged documents were used to secure the release of other prisoners.

The investigation is being conducted under M. Narayana, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Electronic City Division. Assistant Commissioner of Police Satish K.M., Police Inspector P.G. Naveen Kumar, PSIs Mahadevayya and Kalavathi, and other personnel were involved in the investigation and arrests.

Continue Reading

Trending