Crime
Badlapur Sexual Assault Case: Maharashtra Govt Challenges Sessions Court Judge’s Order, Unclear On Filing FIR Against Policemen
 
												Mumbai: The state government has challenged before the Bombay High Court the order of the Thane sessions judge by which it kept “in abeyance” the findings of magistrate inquiry report implicating policemen in the death of accsued in the Badlapur sexual assault case. The State, however, remained non-committal on whether it would register an FIR against the policemen concerned based on the report.
Public Prosecutor Hiteen Venegaonkar informed a bench of Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and Neela Gokhale that they have filed an application before the HC challenging the February 21 order of the Thane sessions court keeping in abeyance the magistrate’s report questioning the legitimacy of the alleged encounter.
On a specific question by the bench on whether an FIR would be lodged against the five policemen based on the findings of the magistrate report, the State maintained that the observations in the magistraterial report cannot be a basis for an FIR.
Senior counsel Amit Desai, appearing for the government, said the an independent investigation is being conducted by the State Criminal Investigation Department (CID), in addition to a probe by an inquiry committee headed by retired judge of Allahabad HC, DB Bhosale. Hence, said that the State will wait for the conclusion of the CID probe before taking any decision.
“State believes that the investigation is ongoing and based upon it’s outcome, it will decide whether FIR is needed to be filed; or no cognisable offence is made and a closure report has to be filed,” Desai underlined.
Desai submitted that it can’t be said that the magistrate’s report “constitutes as evidence to lodge an FIR”. “We are doing our bit and there is nothing to suggest that the investigating officers (of CID) are acting in a mala fide manner for the court to intervene,” he added.
The bench again pointedly asked whether the State proposes to lodge an FIR. “Once that the report has come, our question is whether it is incumbent on the state to register an FIR or not. Today, the question is whether the state proposes to lodge an FIR or not? Say yes or no,” the court asked.
Desai emphasised that the independent probe was on and at this stage it is not permissible for the court to order registering of an FIR based on the magistrate’s inquiry report. The court will continue hearing the matter on March 10.
Last week, the HC had appointed senior advocate Manjula Rao as amicus curiae (friend of the court) to assist with the plea after Shinde’s parents expressed that they did not wish to pursue the case. Rao has been asked to assist the court on several issues, including whether an FIR ought to be registered by the State based on the magistrate’s report. The issue arose after the State argued that the magistrate’s report was only recommendatory.
The father had initially filed a petition claiming that his son was killed in a fake encounter.
Meanwhile, the State’s application against Thane sessions court order would be taken up for hearing after two weeks by Justice RN Laddha. The government has contended that the sessions judge order was “wrong, illegal and against the facts and circumstances of the case”. It contended that the sessions court had failed to consider the fact that the HC was seized of the matter related to the alleged encounter of the accused.
The HC had last week censured the sessions judge for the order.
Shinde had been arrested by the Badlapur police for allegedly sexually assaulting minor girls at a local school. While in judicial custody at Taloja Prison, he was taken into police custody on September 23 via a transfer warrant in connection with a second FIR lodged by his wife. However, during transit, he sustained firearm injuries and later succumbed.
The magistrate’s report, prepared on January 17, raised suspicion on the claims made by the five cops that they had to shoot at the accused in self-defence after he allegedly snatched a gun from them while being escorted. The magistrate noted the policemen, including two inspector-level officers, were in a position to control the situation and the use of force by them was not justified.
Crime
Powai Hostage Case: Mumbai Police Recover Pistol, Petrol & Chemicals From RA Studio; Rohit Arya’s Body Sent For Postmortem

Mumbai: The Mumbai Police have recovered a pistol, petrol, inflammable rubber solution, and a lighter from the Powai studio where Rohit Arya held 17 children and two adults hostage on Thursday. The Mumbai Crime Branch has taken over the investigation, registering a case under Sections 109(1), 140, and 287 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. A forensic analysis of the seized materials is currently underway, officials told Media on Friday.
Earlier on Friday morning, Arya’s body was brought to the JJ Hospital mortuary for postmortem by the Crime Branch team. The 50-year-old filmmaker from Pune was shot during the rescue operation and later declared dead at 5:15 pm on Thursday.
The three-hour hostage crisis unfolded around 1:30 pm at R A Studio, located in the Mahavir Classic building, Powai, when Powai police received an alert about a man holding children captive. The children, aged 10 to 12 years, had been attending auditions for a web series for the past two days.
Before police intervention, Arya released a video message explaining his motives. In the clip, he said he had chosen to take hostages instead of committing suicide, insisting he was ‘not a terrorist’ and had no demand for money. Arya claimed he only wanted to ask some moral and ethical questions and warned that any wrong move by the authorities could lead him to set the studio on fire, potentially harming the children.
“I want to speak to some people… I should not be held responsible if anything happens,” Arya said in the video, adding that after the conversation, he would walk out. His demands, however, remained vague.
The Mumbai Police swiftly mobilised teams from the Quick Response Team (QRT), Bomb Detection and Disposal Squad, Fire Brigade, and negotiators. According to Deputy Commissioner of Police (Zone X) Datta Nalawade, officers entered the building through a duct using a ladder to reach the first floor, where Arya was holding the hostages.
During the rescue, Arya reportedly lunged toward the officers with an air gun and was hit by a police bullet during the ensuing scuffle. “All 17 children and two adults were rescued safely,” said Joint Commissioner of Police (Law and Order) Satyanarayan, confirming the operation’s success around 4:15 pm.
Crime
Fake BARC Scientist Case: Delhi Police Arrest Accused’s Brother In Multi-State Forgery And Espionage Racket

Mumbai: In the sensational fake BARC scientist case, fresh revelations have emerged linking the main accused, Akhtar Hussain Qutubuddin Ahmed alias Alexander Palmer (60), and his relatives to a sprawling forgery network that extended from Mumbai to Jharkhand and Delhi.
The Delhi Police Special Cell has arrested Akhtar’s brother, Adil Hussaini alias Syed Adil Hussain (59 from the Seemapuri area of Delhi for allegedly procuring multiple fake passports and providing sensitive information to foreign entities.
According to sources, fake scientist Akhtar was arrested from Yari Road, Versova on October 17 and now he is in judicial custody. Following Akhtar’s interrogation accused Monazir Khan (34) was arrested from Jamshedpur, Jharkhand on October 25. Monazir is in police custody till November 1.
Akhtar’s Brother Adil possessed one genuine and two allegedly forged passports. His arrest came after crucial inputs from the Mumbai crime branch, which earlier nabbed Akhtar and his associate Monazir Nazimuddin Khan from Jamshedpur. Investigations suggest Adil played a key role in coordinating the fake identity network and arranging for forged documents through Monazir.
Police investigations revealed that Monazir had fabricated fake Aadhaar, PAN cards, and passports under the name Ali Reza Hoseini alias Alexander Palmer for Akhtar in 2016–17, charging ₹19,000 for the job.
These forged documents enabled Akhtar to travel to several countries between 2017 and 2025. Monazir also created fake academic certificates including 10th, 12th, BSc, BE (Mechanical), and MBA degrees allegedly to support Akhtar’s false credentials as a scientist.
Crime Branch officers recovered crucial evidence from Monazir’s office in Jamshedpur, including seven digital storage devices and multiple forged educational and identity documents of Akhtar and Adil.
It was also found that Monazir provided fake documents to other individuals, suggesting a wider racket in Jharkhand involving the sale of counterfeit educational certificates and IDs.
During Akhtar’s interrogation, he claimed that all three of his brothers Asif, Arif, and Adil were deceased. He said Asif died in Saudi Arabia, Arif in Prayagraj, and Adil in Jamshedpur. However, investigators later discovered that Adil was alive and residing in Delhi. He was arrested by the Delhi Police Special Cell on October 26.
The Investigation revealed that Adil had obtained passports under multiple identities Mohammad Adil Hussaini and Naseem Syed Adil Hussain and had travelled to several countries, including Pakistan. This raised suspicions of possible espionage activities or attempts to pass on sensitive nuclear-related information abroad.
Police sources confirmed that Monazir had used an incomplete address as Road No. 6, near Grace College, Jawahar Nagar, Jamshedpur — when applying for Akhtar’s passport under the name Alexander Palmer. He later admitted this was deliberate since the area had a predominantly Christian population, making the name “Alexander Palmer” appear genuine.
Despite the incomplete address, neither the passport office nor the local police flagged any objections during verification, raising serious concerns about administrative lapses.
Similarly, Adil’s forged passport also carried an incomplete address referring to the same sold Jamshedpur property once owned by the Akhtar’s family. Authorities are now investigating how such major discrepancies escaped detection during official scrutiny.
According to investigators, Akhtar and Adil used their fake identities to travel across at least five countries, mostly in the Gulf region. Akhtar, posing as “Alexander Palmer,” allegedly presented himself as a BARC scientist at various consulates, showing printed nuclear maps sourced from magazines and online material. He claimed to possess classified information in exchange for money.
Forensic analysis of Akhtar’s mobile phone revealed that he used the Super VPN Pro app to mask his IP location, helping him appear to be in another country while online. Investigators suspect this was used to communicate with foreign contacts undetected.
The Mumbai crime branch, Delhi Police special cell, and Jharkhand Police are now jointly investigating how the accused obtained multiple Indian passports and fake government IDs. Crime branch officers have also contacted Mumbai airport immigration authorities to verify how Akhtar managed to clear international travel checks using these forged identities.
The police have also confirmed that Adil may have been in touch with foreign nuclear agencies while in Delhi. The special cell is expected to seek Akhtar’s custody soon to interrogate both brothers face-to-face.
This case, which began with the arrest of a fake scientist from Versova, has now evolved into one of India’s most complex identity forgery and espionage investigations exposing deep administrative failures and a possible cross-border intelligence network.
Business
CBI Chargesheet Alleges ₹2,796 Crore Yes Bank Fraud Involving Anil Ambani’s ADA Group And Rana Kapoor

Mumbai: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) which is probing the transactions between Yes bank through its former Managing Director Rana Kapoor and Anil Dhirubhai Ambani (ADA) Group company, has alleged that the funds received from the bank in M/s Reliance Home Finance Limited (RHFL) and Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL) were further diverted to several shell companies, created only to receive funds.
CBI has submitted a chargesheet before the special CBI court against Rana Kapoor and his family, Anil Ambani and other companies for causing loss to Yes bank to the tune of Rs 2796.77 crores, as the investments made in ADA group could not be recovered.
The agency has said that during 2017-2019, Yes Bank had invested Rs. 2965.00 crores and Rs 2045.00 crores through subscription of Non- Convertible Debentures (NCDs) & Commercial Papers (CPs) of M/s RHFL and M/s RCFL respectively.
The agency has in its chargesheet listed down several shell companies which further received funds from RHFL and RCFL. The list of these shell companies, as mentioned in CBI’s chargesheet include – Gamesa Investment Management Pvt Ltd (GIMPL), Species Commerce and Trade Pvt, Crest Logistics and Engineers Pvt Ltd, Gamesa Investment Management Pvt Ltd, and Mohanbir Hi-Tech Build Pvt Ltd.
The agency claimed that, “the primary purpose of these shell companies was to receive funds from RHFL and RCFL acted on instructions of Anil Ambani.”
CBI claimed that Anil Ambani was unable to directly invest the funds available at the disposal of M/s Reliance Nippon Mutual Fund in the financial companies of the ADA Group, which were under stress, due SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations. Hence in a criminal conspiracy, Yes Bank Ltd subscribed to NCDs of M/s RHFL, M/s RCFL and M/s Reliance Capital Limited (RCL).
In return, the agency alleged that the funds available at the disposal of M/s Reliance Nippon Mutual Fund, invested in YBL AT-1 bonds and AMC also invested in Rana Kapoor’s family firm.
Thus, funds available with Reliance Nippon Mutual Funds were routed to the group companies of ADA through Yes Bank, CBI claimed, adding that the funds were further diverted to other shell companies.
The agency has alleged that it all started with the meeting held between Rana Kapoor and Anil Ambani on October 6, 2017, just a month before the Reliance Nippon Life Asset Management Limited (AMC) was listed with BSE and NSE on November 6, 2017.
The agency pointed out that “the abnormal decision of YBL to make huge investment in the NCDs of the financial companies of ADA Group and the abnormal decision of the AMC to make huge investment in the YBL AT-1 Bonds were taken in this meeting. Both the investment decisions were taken in a hasty manner and without holding any discussion between the officers of YBL and the officers of the AMC.”
It is claimed that on October 6, 2017 it was Friday, hence the following working day that is on October 9, 2017, the process began. The agency claimed that on October 9, 2017, Kapoor instructed senior executives of IFIB for initiating the proposal for investing in NCDs worth Rs 2900 crores in three ADA group companies – RHFL, RCFL and RCL. The agency claimed that the investment transaction was completed and funds were transferred on October 13, 2017.
On the other hand, AMC, allegedly under the influence of Anil Ambani, prepared a formal note for increasing the long-term debt investment limit in M/s Morgan Credits Private Limited (MCPL), a firm owned by Radha and Roshini, from Rs 550 crores to Rs 625 crores. Accordingly in ten days AMC invested Rs 50 crores in MCPL.
Meanwhile, on October 9, 2017, Yes Bank initiated the process for issuance of fresh AT-1 bond under the instructions of Rana Kapoor, even when the DCM team of the bank had raised apprehension for arranging subscribers for making investment in fresh YBL AT 1 bonds in such a span, wherein they were still busy in offloading earlier bonds in secondary market, CBI alleged.
However, CBI claimed that Rana Kapoor had informed them that Reliance Nippon Mutual fund would make an investment of Rs 2000 crores through private placement and Rs 1000 crores secondary market in YBL AT 1 bond.
The agency claimed that AMC had enhanced the sub limit for YBL AT – 1 bond by about 600% in a short span of time, as compared to the sub-limit of other banks which was at max enhanced to 70%.
- 
																	   Crime3 years ago Crime3 years agoClass 10 student jumps to death in Jaipur 
- 
																	   Maharashtra1 year ago Maharashtra1 year agoMumbai Local Train Update: Central Railway’s New Timetable Comes Into Effect; Check Full List Of Revised Timings & Stations 
- 
																	   Maharashtra1 year ago Maharashtra1 year agoMumbai To Go Toll-Free Tonight! Maharashtra Govt Announces Complete Toll Waiver For Light Motor Vehicles At All 5 Entry Points Of City 
- 
																	   Maharashtra1 year ago Maharashtra1 year agoFalse photo of Imtiaz Jaleel’s rally, exposing the fooling conspiracy 
- 
																	   National News1 year ago National News1 year agoMinistry of Railways rolls out Special Drive 4.0 with focus on digitisation, cleanliness, inclusiveness and grievance redressal 
- 
																	   Maharashtra12 months ago Maharashtra12 months agoMaharashtra Elections 2024: Mumbai Metro & BEST Services Extended Till Midnight On Voting Day 
- 
																	   National News1 year ago National News1 year agoJ&K: 4 Jawans Killed, 28 Injured After Bus Carrying BSF Personnel For Poll Duty Falls Into Gorge In Budgam; Terrifying Visuals Surface 
- 
																	   Crime1 year ago Crime1 year agoBaba Siddique Murder: Mumbai Police Unable To Get Lawrence Bishnoi Custody Due To Home Ministry Order, Says Report 

 
								 
																	
																															 
									 
																	 
									 
																	 
									 
																	 
									 
																	 
									 
																	 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											