Tehran, April 2: Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said that Iranian people harbour no enmity towards the American people, accusing the US administration of fighting Iran as a “proxy for Israel.”

He made the remarks in a letter addressed to the American people while elaborating on Iran’s positions regarding the ongoing war with the United States and Israel, reports Xinhua news agency.

“The Iranian people harbour no enmity toward other nations, including the people of America, Europe, or neighbouring countries,” Pezeshkian said, adding, “Even in the face of repeated foreign interventions and pressures throughout their proud history, Iranians have consistently drawn a clear distinction between governments and the peoples they govern.”

Pezeshkian said Iran “has never, in its modern history, chosen the path of aggression, expansion, colonialism, or domination” despite having suffered occupation, invasion, and pressure by global powers.

He said casting Iran as a threat is a narrative manufactured by Israel “to divert global attention away from its crimes toward the Palestinians.”

Pezeshkian pointed to the US military buildup and bases around Iran, emphasising that the ongoing US “aggressions” launched from those bases “have demonstrated how threatening such a military presence truly is.”

In response to US President Donald Trump’s threats of conducting large-scale strikes on Iranian energy facilities in the coming days, he said attacking the country’s vital infrastructure directly targets the Iranian people, stressing that such actions constitute “war crimes” and involve consequences extending beyond Iran’s borders.

Pezeshkian said the United States has entered the war with Iran as a “proxy for Israel” and under its influence, adding Israel seeks to fight Iran “to the last American soldier and the last American taxpayer dollar” in pursuit of its “illegitimate interests.”

“Is ‘America First’ truly among the priorities of the US government today?” he asked.

He added that the world is currently “standing at a crossroads,” having to choose between confrontation and engagement.

On February 28, Israel and the United States launched joint attacks on Tehran and several other Iranian cities, killing Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, along with senior military commanders and civilians. Iran responded by launching waves of missile and drone strikes targeting Israel and US bases and assets in the Middle East.

Islamabad, April 1: In yet another shocking crime details emerging from Pakistan, four men allegedly gang raped a woman in a van that moved around the Baga Sheikhan area which comes under the jurisdiction of Rawat police in Pakistan’s Punjab province, local media reported.

A police spokesperson said special teams have been set up to arrest the accused and raids were being conducted. He further mentioned that victim’s medical examination has been conducted, Pakistan’s leading daily Dawn reported.

The victim’s mother filed an FIR with the police on Sunday, stating that her 19-year-old daughter, who has been married for five years, went to the market to buy clothes for her children for Eid. After reaching Chak Beli Morr, she boarded a wagon to go to Rawat Bazaar.

During the journey, the conductor allegedly closed the door and turned the vehicle back towards Chak Beli Road. According to the FIR, the conductor overpowered the victim after she raised an alarm. The van then moved towards Chak Beli Road, where she was made to board another van by one individual, while the driver was identified as “S”.

The accused then took the victim to the Baga Sheikhan area, where they stopped near a house and tried to forcibly take her inside. As per the FIR, another accomplice was called to the spot. Thereafter, all four accused allegedly took turns to assault her in the vehicle while driving on different roads around Baga Sheikhan. Later, they dropped the victim near Chak Beli Morr.

The complainant stated that the accused threatened her daughter and recorded her video. Police has lodged a case and started a probe into the matter.

Earlier this month, the Human Rights Council of Pakistan (HRCP) revealed that 258 rape cases were reported in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in 2025. However, only one conviction was recorded.

HRCP revealed the fresh statistics in a 2025 human rights report launched at the Peshawar Press Club, Dawn reported. During the launch of the report, the council’s provincial president Izharuddin Khan said that around five per cent of women in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa faced violence regularly. He stated that about 30 per cent of gender-based violence cases were reported while nearly 70 per cent remained unreported in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Khan mentioned that harassment cases were also reported in universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, adding that female students were not safe from gender-based harassment. According to the report, harassment complaints were made in University of Peshawar and University of Malakand. He said that traditional practices such as swara, the giving of girls in marriage to settle disputes, was still practiced in parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

According to the report, there was rise in digital harassment, with about 160,000 cybercrime cases reported in 2025. However, officials said these showed only cases where victims knew about cybercrime reporting techniques while an estimated 30 to 40 per cent of incidents went unreported due to lack of knowledge.

Representatives of the council urged the government to introduce legislation to safeguard rights of women and ensure their safety. They urged the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly to approve women’s empowerment policy and implement laws addressing acid attacks and domestic violence. They also called for setting up special courts and dedicated funds to tackle cases related to gender-based violence and demanded stronger measures to empower women and protect their rights.

Washington, April 1: US President Donald Trump said he plans to attend a US Supreme Court hearing on birthright citizenship, as the top court prepares to take up a closely watched legal challenge to his executive order on the issue.

“I think so. I do,” Trump said when asked if he would be present in court. “Because I have listened to this argument for so long.”

The case centres on Trump’s effort to end automatic citizenship for children born in the United States to non-citizen parents, a long-standing constitutional interpretation rooted in the 14th Amendment.

Trump framed his argument in historical terms, linking birthright citizenship to the post-Civil War period. “This was about slaves,” he said, adding, “It had to do with the babies of slaves and the protection of the babies of slaves.”

He argued that the current application of the policy had strayed from its original intent. “It didn’t have to do with the protection of multi-millionaires and billionaires wanting to have their children get an American citizenship,” Trump said.

Calling the existing system flawed, he said, “It is the craziest thing I’ve ever seen. It’s been so badly handled by legal people over the years.”

Trump also criticised what he described as misuse of the policy. “We’re getting all of these people… saying, congratulations, your whole family is going to be a citizen of the United States of America,” he said.

The President expressed confidence in his legal position but also voiced concerns about judicial outcomes. Referring to judges appointed by Democratic presidents, he said, “You can have the greatest case ever… they’re going to rule against you.”

He contrasted that with Republican-appointed judges, saying they often “want to show how honorable they are” by ruling independently.

The issue has become increasingly politicised in recent years, with Republicans arguing for tighter restrictions and Democrats defending the existing interpretation as a fundamental constitutional guarantee.

The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, established birthright citizenship to ensure that formerly enslaved people and their descendants were recognised as US citizens.

Legal experts have long debated the scope of the amendment, but courts have historically upheld a broad interpretation, making any change subject to intense judicial scrutiny.