National News
Golf course has dress code, can students come in minis, asks SC in Hijab row hearing
The Supreme Court on Monday shot a volley of questions at petitioners’ counsel challenging the ban on wearing of hijab in government colleges in Karnataka, wondering whether a student’s choice of wearing minis to the classroom would be justified, and highlighted that a dress code is applicable on a golf course, restaurant, and courtroom.
A bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said wearing hijab might be a religious practice, but the question is can one take hijab to a school where a uniform is prescribed? The bench orally observed Karnataka’s government’s order allowing college development committees to prescribe uniforms did not appear to violate the right to education.
Justice Gupta queried senior advocate Sanjay Hedge, representing one of the petitioners, if the absence of a prescription of a dress code would enable the students to wear anything to the classroom. “Can students come in minis… whatever they want when there is no prescription, would the executive power of state come in?”
“You are saying Act (Karnataka Education Act) doesn’t prescribe dress code and does not debar prescription either. Does it exclude the state then?”
“You may have a religious right…. can you take that right within an educational institution where a uniform is prescribed. You may be entitled to wear the hijab or scarf; can you carry the right within an educational institution (where a uniform has been prescribed).”
At the beginning of the hearing, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing one of the petitioners, submitted the case raises an important question, whether hijab is essential to Islam or not. He said hijab is worn in a large number of countries throughout the world and the case involves a constitutional question which has not been dealt with earlier.
The Karnataka government, led by Advocate General Prabhuling K. Navadgi submitted that “we have left it to the institution concerned. The government purposefully left it to the college development council.” He added that to his knowledge, at least two colleges in Udupi allowed Hijab.
Additional Solicitor General K.M. Nataraj, also representing Karnataka, submitted discipline in colleges was only the issue, but petitioners were unnecessarily expanding it and some under the guise of religious practices wanted to violate it.
Hedge tried to link wearing of hijab with modesty and dignity of girls, and added that most girls’ colleges prescribe salwar kameez and dupatta. He argued further, can one ask women not to wear a chunni on head, for example in Patiala? Can one control the modesty of a woman?
The bench said even courtrooms have a dress code, for example could a woman wear jeans to the courtroom saying it’s her choice, there is a dress code on a golf course, which is a public space, and also certain restaurants have a dress code and they do not allow people in shorts. “Can a person say I won’t follow dress code but still have access?” it asked.
Hedge said the golf course is private property. The bench replied that this is not always the case.
Hedge argued that under the rule making power of the Karnataka Education Act, the executive cannot violate the fundamental rights. The bench noted that the government is not denying the right to education, but they are saying that you have to come in uniform. The bench has scheduled the matter for further hearing on Wednesday at 2 pm.
The top court was hearing a clutch of petitions against the Karnataka High Court judgment, which upheld the right of educational institutions to ban wearing of hijab in pre-university colleges in the state.
General
India condemns misleading content created by Chinese vloggers, deliberate distortion of geographical locations

New Delhi : India on Tuesday severely condemned attempts being made by the Chinese vloggers to portray impoverished neighbourhoods in Bangladesh’s capital Dhaka as New Delhi through misleading content, saying such efforts to peddle false narratives undermine the credibility of those undertaking and backing them. Addressing a bi-weekly press briefing in New Delhi, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal urged the authorities concerned to take action against those involved.
“We have seen media reports in this regard. Such efforts to present a distorted picture of any country are unfortunate. Insofar as efforts to buy foreign elements to portray Dhaka as Delhi are concerned, the peddling of false narratives only undermines the credibility of those who are undertaking such actions and those who are behind them. And we would urge the authorities concerned to take action against such people,” he said.
The remarks came amid reports that over 150 Chinese nationals have been filming and livestreaming from economically disadvantaged neighbourhoods of Dhaka, falsely depicting them as parts of New Delhi.
While recording footage from these locations, they made disparaging comments about India’s living standards, sanitation, food habits, and poverty.
The misleading portrayal has sparked concerns over the deliberate distortion of geographical locations and the possible use of deceptive online content to create negative perceptions about India among international audiences.
The incident underscored the growing threat posed by misinformation and manipulated content on social media, where sensationalised posts can spread widely before their authenticity is established.
The activities have reportedly been taking place in Dhaka’s Tekpara and Uttara areas for several months, with streamers remaining active from early morning until late at night.
One Chinese woman identified as ‘Mianmian’, who claimed to be from China’s Sichuan province, livestreamed from beside a canal in Uttara Sector 12 of Dhaka on November 1. She reportedly presented the area to her online audience as New Delhi and described the residential buildings and surrounding areas as dirty, underdeveloped, and unhygienic.
“This is New Delhi. Their homes are extremely dirty. There isn’t even a fan inside the tin-roofed houses. This place is quite underdeveloped, dirty and unhygienic, and the law-and-order situation is poor,” leading Bangladeshi daily ‘Prothom Alo’ quoted her as saying.
In another instance, a Chinese national was seen live streaming from tea stalls in the Tekpara locality of Dhaka, making the offensive remarks that the tea consumed by locals was made using “cow urine”.
“Look, they are drinking tea. Do you know what kind of tea this is? This is cow urine tea. They drink cow urine tea,” Prothom Alo quoted him as saying.
The footage also contained derogatory comments on the residents’ lifestyles, with repeated references to poor hygiene, lack of sanitation, and substandard living conditions.
These are not isolated incidents, as reports of Chinese content creators recording videos in Dhaka’s underprivileged neighbourhoods have been emerging since May 2026.
The recurring pattern of Chinese content creators repeatedly filming in the same low-income neighbourhoods, along with allegations of geographical misrepresentation and intrusive filming, raises concerns about attempts to undermine India’s image internationally.
These recent developments point to a coordinated anti-India campaign. The issue is not merely the recording of impoverished neighbourhoods, but the calculated misrepresentation of locations in another country as parts of India, coupled with disparaging remarks intended to influence how international audiences perceive Indian society.
National News
Wife’s right to pursue higher education, career not dependent on husband’s favour: Jharkhand HC

Ranchi : The Jharkhand High Court has observed that a married woman’s right to pursue higher education and a career is her inherent right and not a privilege granted by her husband. The court said that describing contrary views of a woman’s desire to study or work as “ambition” or “over-ambition” reflects a discriminatory mindset and is rooted in gender bias. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice M.S. Sonak and Justice Manoj Prasad made the observations while allowing a matrimonial appeal filed by a woman from Jamshedpur seeking divorce on grounds of mental and physical cruelty.
The Bench set aside a March 16, 2019 order of the Family Court in Jamshedpur, which had dismissed her divorce petition. The High Court examined evidence presented by the wife during the appeal proceedings. She had testified before the Family Court and had corroborated the allegations by statements of her father, Alakh Ram, and neighbour, Pankaj Kumar Singh. The court noted that the husband neither produced any witness in his defence nor cross-examined the wife and her witnesses properly.
The Bench further observed that although the husband had denied the allegations in his written statement, his response was vague and general. Referring to provisions under Order VIII Rules 3, 4 and 5 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), the court said allegations must be specifically and categorically denied, and a blanket denial is legally insufficient. The court held that the Family Court had erred in disregarding the wife’s testimony. It also disagreed with the lower court’s observation that the wife’s education and employment were the result of the husband’s generosity and support. The High Court said that when a husband continues his education or career after marriage, it is considered normal, and the same standard must apply to a wife. Judicial decisions, it added, cannot be based on gender stereotypes. Setting aside the Family Court order, the High Court granted the woman a decree of divorce.
National News
Sonia Gandhi recalls losing first child : shares how Indira consoled her and Rajiv Gandhi

New Delhi : Congress leader Sonia Gandhi and her husband, former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, suffered a major heartbreak and a deeply personal tragedy soon after marriage, as their newborn child passed away hours after birth. Sonia, in her autobiography titled ‘Belonging: A Journey of Love’, shares that the environment of joy and happiness that prevailed in the Gandhi household over her pregnancy turned sombre and macabre as she and Rajiv lost their first child, despite the newborn appearing healthy. She also recounts how her mother-in-law and former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi cut short her official tours and took time out to console and comfort the grieving young parents. According to the memoir, Sonia gave birth to a baby boy on January 18, 1969, and it was a preterm delivery. This happened about a year before Rahul Gandhi’s birth in 1970.
“I heard the baby’s first cry as he was placed in the incubator. Later Rajiv took me to see him, a tiny, perfectly formed boy, with thick, black hair and long, slim fingers,” Media quoted her saying in the memoir. “We fell in love with him immediately,” she adds. Hours later, they were told by the doctors that their child was no more. Penning down the excruciating experience, she says that the shock and fear of losing their first child was utterly difficult for both of them to swallow. “No, it was not possible! Why, why, I kept asking. Both of us were shocked and heartbroken,” she writes. Rajiv Gandhi also grieved and broke down over the child’s loss and cried along with her despite his “stiff upper lip” upbringing. She further recalls Indira Gandhi truncating her official tours and rushing back to the hospital to comfort and help them overcome the irreparable loss.
“She embraced us, her eyes red and swollen,” she says, recounting how the former Prime Minister sat with them. The Congress leader also shares the ‘anguished moments’ of bidding goodbye to their deceased child and how she refused the proposal of disposing of the body in a river, as was the traditional practice prevalent then. According to the memoir, the prospect of laying the infant’s body to rest was debated at home multiple times, and finally it was decided that the child be buried at Feroze Gandhi’s farm in South Delhi’s Mehrauli. “It was a painful and agonising option, but there was no other way,” she further says in the memoir and also adds that for a long time, she and Rajiv would pause and place a flower each time near the bougainvillaea bush, where the child was buried.
-
Crime4 years agoClass 10 student jumps to death in Jaipur
-
Maharashtra2 years agoMumbai Local Train Update: Central Railway’s New Timetable Comes Into Effect; Check Full List Of Revised Timings & Stations
-
Maharashtra2 years agoMumbai To Go Toll-Free Tonight! Maharashtra Govt Announces Complete Toll Waiver For Light Motor Vehicles At All 5 Entry Points Of City
-
Maharashtra2 years agoFalse photo of Imtiaz Jaleel’s rally, exposing the fooling conspiracy
-
National News2 years agoMinistry of Railways rolls out Special Drive 4.0 with focus on digitisation, cleanliness, inclusiveness and grievance redressal
-
Maharashtra2 years agoMaharashtra Elections 2024: Mumbai Metro & BEST Services Extended Till Midnight On Voting Day
-
National News2 years agoJ&K: 4 Jawans Killed, 28 Injured After Bus Carrying BSF Personnel For Poll Duty Falls Into Gorge In Budgam; Terrifying Visuals Surface
-
Crime2 years agoBaba Siddique Murder: Mumbai Police Unable To Get Lawrence Bishnoi Custody Due To Home Ministry Order, Says Report
