Connect with us
Tuesday,25-August-2026
Breaking News

Maharashtra

Devotion row: Maha govt mandates Ramtek Ram devotee oath for temple trustees, Oppn questions

Published

on

Mumbai, July 10: The Maharashtra government on Friday passed a Bill to reconstitute the trust governing the historic Ram temple at Ramtek, drawing sharp rebukes from Opposition leaders who question the legality and logic of legislating religious devotion.

The legislative move comes on the heels of a separate controversy surrounding the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Trust in Ayodhya. Rocked by an alleged Rs 1,400-crore donation theft row, the Ayodhya trust recently began searching for its first CEO, stipulating that “Ram ke prati shraddha ka bhav” (devotion to Lord Ram) is the foremost prerequisite for the role.

However, while Ayodhya’s search committee treats this as an internal hiring preference, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led Maharashtra government has taken it a step further by making a declaration of faith a statutory legal requirement.

Located roughly 50 km from Nagpur, Ramtek holds immense religious significance. Local tradition holds that Lord Ram stayed there during his 14-year exile, and the site attracts hundreds of thousands of pilgrims annually for festivals such as Ram Navami and Kartik Purnima.

The new Bill seeks to revamp the administration of the Bhosala Devasthan at Ramtek, an ancient temple complex currently overseen by a court-appointed Sub-Divisional Officer. Under the new law, any prospective member of the trust’s management committee must submit a formal declaration affirming they are a “devotee of Shri Ram of Ramtek.”

The newly constituted board will feature government-appointed office-bearers alongside ex officio members, including the local Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) and the president of the Ramtek Municipal Council. Trustees will be entitled to an honorarium, travel allowances, and daily allowances funded directly by the temple’s management reserves.

The mandate sparked intense debate on the assembly floor, with Opposition MLAs cutting straight to the clause’s theological and practical absurdities. NCP SP MLA Jayant Patil asked how anyone could be a devotee of Lord Ram from a particular area and whether the government was dividing devotees of Lord Ram.

Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA Varun Sardesai questioned the enforceability of the mandate, asking what the affidavit meant and whether the government had a mechanism to cross-check its authenticity.

Beyond the spiritual metrics, Congress Legislature Party leader Vijay Wadettiwar took aim at the Bill’s financial provisions, invoking the recent financial shadow over Ayodhya. Wadettiwar noted that a total theft of Rs 1,400 crore was reported in Ayodhya.

He questioned why political leaders were being placed on the trust and why trustees should be paid allowances for serving Lord Ram.

The Bill was introduced by Minister of State Ashish Jaiswal, who represents the Ramtek Assembly constituency.

Jaiswal defended the legislation as a necessary step toward transparency, arguing that the temple’s expanding activities, growing financial footprint, and substantial properties require modernised, efficient administration.

However, Minister Jaiswal’s dual role sparked immediate pushback. NCP (SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad publicly questioned whether a clear conflict of interest existed, given that Jaiswal introduced a piece of legislation under which he would automatically secure a seat as an ex officio trustee.

Minister Jaiswal did not respond to the conflict-of-interest allegations or to the Opposition’s questions regarding the verification of the devotion affidavit.

Maharashtra

Questions Raised by Mumbai MLAs Drop 72% in 15th Assembly, Praja Foundation Report Reveals

Published

on

MUMBAI, August 25, 2026: Legislative participation among Mumbai’s elected representatives has witnessed a sharp decline, with total questions raised in the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly dropping by 72% compared to the 12th Assembly, according to the ‘Mumbai MLA Report Card 2026’ released by Praja Foundation.

The report evaluated the performance of 33 Mumbai MLAs across the Winter 2024 and Monsoon 2025 sessions based on session attendance, participation, quality of questions raised, and overall constitutional duties. Out of 33 MLAs, only three scored above 80%, with Indian National Congress representatives securing all top three positions.
Top Performing MLAs

Rank 1: Amin Patel (Congress) — Score: 82.89

Rank 2: Aslam Shaikh (Congress) — Score: 80.58

Rank 3: Jyoti Gaikwad (Congress) — Score: 80.30

Key Report Findings

Plunge in Legislative Inquiries: MLAs asked only 2,213 questions in the 15th Assembly (Winter 2024 – Monsoon 2025), down significantly from 7,955 questions in the 12th Assembly (Winter 2009 – Monsoon 2010).

Decline in Question Quality: The quality score of questions asked dropped from an average of 50% in the 12th Assembly to 33% in the 15th Assembly.

Fewer Working Days: In its first year, the 15th Assembly met for only 40 working days, compared to 47 days in the 12th Assembly and 50 days in the 13th Assembly.

Stagnant Overall Scores: The overall average performance score of legislators fell from 61 in the 12th Assembly to 54 in the 14th Assembly, before slightly recovering to 55 in the 15th Assembly.

Aging Representatives: The average age of Mumbai MLAs has progressively increased over time, moving from 52 years (12th Assembly) and 51 years (13th Assembly) to 53 years (14th Assembly) and now 57 years in the 15th Assembly.

Concerns Over Democratic Accountability
Addressing the findings, Milind Mhaske, CEO of Praja Foundation, stated that performance metrics reflect whether citizens’ concerns are reaching the house floor. While top performers demonstrated strong engagement, the overall stagnating scores highlight significant gaps in representation.

Asif Khan, Manager at Praja Foundation, warned that shorter session durations and fewer quality questions deprive citizens of a critical mechanism to hold the government accountable.

Continue Reading

Maharashtra

Mumbai: Youth arrested for throwing an egg at the Mazgaon Ganpati procession.

Published

on

Police have claimed to have arrested a fanatic youth who threw eggs during a Ganpati procession in Mazgaon, Mumbai. On the night of August 23, a procession of the Raja of Mazgaon was taken out in Mumbai. During this time, a youth who was going to the same building for egg delivery was disturbed by the dust and smoke of crackers during the procession and in anger he threw an egg at the Ganpati idol, after which the situation became tense. However, the police identified the accused with the help of CCTV and he was arrested today. He has been identified as Danish Sher Khan, 22. The police traced the accused within 36 hours. Now the situation is tense, but peace has been restored. Just before Eid Milad-un-Nabi, the police arrested the anti-social Danish and started the investigation. In the initial investigation, the police have found that the accused had committed this act in anger. The accused was carrying an online order. Meanwhile, due to the crowd in the procession with him, his eyes were hurt by the smoke and dust of the crackers, which caused him to lose his temper. The egg I had brought for delivery was thrown at the Ganpati procession, after which the situation became tense and the police resolved the matter. This action was taken by DCP Jayant Meena on the instructions of Mumbai Police Commissioner Devin Bharti.

Continue Reading

Maharashtra

Versova-Bandra Sea Link gets a 1,421-day extension — where is the penalty?

Published

on

Mumbai: Information provided by the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) under the Right to Information (RTI) Act has revealed significant delays in Mumbai’s ambitious Versova Samudra Bandra Sea Link (VBSLP) project. The project’s start date was June 24, 2019, and under the original contract, it was scheduled to be completed by June 21, 2024. However, due to various reasons, the project has been extended by a total of 1,421 days in four phases, despite which the final revised completion date was pushed forward, not to May 2, 2024, but to May 17. No penalty has been imposed on the contractor, Webuild-Apco JV.

According to information provided by MSRDC in response to an RTI application filed by Anil Gilgli, the first extension of 250 days was granted on June 23, 2020. The main reason was non-availability of land required for the casting yard. Subsequently, on September 14, 2020, an additional extension of 180 days was granted due to restrictions and work disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Later, on February 10, 2022, an extension of 483 days was granted due to restructuring or changes within the EPC contractors’ joint venture (JV). Finally, on January 19, 2024, a further extension of 508 days was granted due to changes in the scope of work and additional works. The total duration of these four extensions is 1,421 days, with the final date of completion of the project set at May 17, 2028. According to the MSRDC letter dated June 23, 2020, the contractor had sought an extension of about 311 days for the period from April 2020 to April 2020. The reasons for the delay during this period include various incidents as well as the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequently, revised work phases and timelines were established for the project. Meanwhile, the MSRDC letter dated January 19, 2024 mentions further extension based on changes in the scope of work and revision of work phases.

A serious question arises as to why no punitive action has been taken against the contractor Webuild-Apco JV for the delay despite repeated extensions to the project. RTI activist and senior journalist Anil Gilgali said that the financial burden of delay in this important project, which was run with public money, may ultimately fall on the government exchequer and the common people. Therefore, instead of simply giving relief to Webuild-Apco JV by way of extension of time, the penalty provisions stipulated in the contract should be strictly enforced.

“The Versova-Bandra Sea Link project has been given an extension of a total of 1,421 days. The original completion date was June 21, 2024, while the last date has now been extended to May 17, 2028. The delay in the project is resulting in wastage of both public funds and time. Therefore, by simply stating the reason, the reason is given. Anil Galgali demanded that damages (LD)—penalties for compensation for losses—should be immediately imposed on the contractor, Webuild-Apco JV and recovered as per the provisions of the contract. Galgali added, “An extension does not mean allowing the Webuild-Apco JV contractor to delay the work. While some reasons for the delay may be acceptable, the responsibilities and penalty clauses stipulated in the contract must be implemented. It is a matter of serious concern that the final deadline for this project, which was set on June 2, 2019—has now been extended to May 17, 2028. Therefore, MSRDC should publicly disclose clear details about the reasons for each extension, the party responsible for the delay, the additional financial burden resulting from it, and whether the damages have been averted.

The Versova-Bandra Sea Link is a key project for Mumbai’s traffic infrastructure. However, the project timeline continues to be extended due to continuous delays in the work. Consequently, the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) should clearly identify the reasons and accountability for these delays and recover penalty from the Webuild-Apco JV contractor for any delays attributable to them, as per the contract. Additionally, RTI activist Anil Gilgali has demanded steps to ensure that the extended project period does not impose additional financial burden on the government exchequer.

Continue Reading

Trending