New York, April 26: “It’s a dangerous profession”, US President Donald Trump said when a reporter asked him about the latest assassination attempt against him.

It indeed is: He has faced three assassination attempts, the latest on Saturday, with one attempt during his presidential campaign injuring him.

Like him, many US presidents have come under violent attacks, and four were killed.

On July 13, 2024, when Trump was campaigning for president’s elections in Pennsylvania, he had a miraculous escape with the bullet only grazing his ear as he tilted his head to look at a chart projected on a giant screen.

It fatally struck a man on the stage behind him, and the gunman who fired at him at the open-air venue from a nearby building was killed by a Secret Service sharpshooter.

There was a furore over the security lapse, and several Secret Service personnel faced action.

Two months later, on September 15, 2024, a man was discovered hidden in the shrubbery with a rifle at the fence around Trump’s golf course in Florida.

A Secret Service agent fired at him, but he fled and was later captured, put on trial and sentenced in February to life in prison.

Like many politicians across the ideological spectrum and judges and other officials, Trump continually gets death threats in a sharply polarised nation.

The Hilton Hotel, where Saturday’s attempt against Trump took place, featured in another presidential assassination attempt: It was against Ronald Reagan, who was shot and wounded in March 1981 outside the hotel.

Reagan suffered a puncture to his lung in the attack by a man who was declared insane and escaped trial.

The man, John Hinckley, claimed he tried to kill Reagan to impress the actress, Jodie Foster, on whom he had a fixation.

John F. Kennedy was a presidential victim to die. He was killed in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963, by an American who had defected to the Soviet Union and returned to the US.

That man, Lee Harvey Oswald, was, in turn, killed by Jack Ruby, who was said to be angry at him, but it gave rise to several conspiracy theories.

Oswald shot Kennedy from a building while the president was riding in an open car.

John Kennedy’s brother, Robert, was killed five years later in California while he was campaigning for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination.

Gerald Ford came close to being killed by a member of a cult in September 1975 in California.

But the gun pointed at him from a close range failed, and the woman wielding it spent 34 years in prison for it.

An Indian origin man, Sai Varshith Kandula, who rammed a truck at a barrier to the White House in May 2023, said he planned to kill Joe Biden and take over the country.

He had a Nazi flag in his truck and expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler. He was sentenced to eight years in prison.

President Abraham Lincoln was the first president to be assassinated. He was shot dead on April 18, 1865, inside a Washington theatre.

Lincoln had led the nation in the Civil War, in which he defeated the secessionist states that opposed the abolition of slavery.

Other presidents killed are James Garfield in 1881 and William McKinley in 1901.

Kalyan: The escalating traffic congestion in Kalyan has triggered a sharp political confrontation with Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) leaders locking horns with the traffic police over alleged administrative failure and irregularities involving auto-rickshaw operations.

The issue came to a head during a heated meeting at the ACP traffic office where Shiv Sena (UBT) Deputy Leader Vijay Salvi accused the traffic department of being “inactive” and alleged a nexus between officials and rickshaw drivers. The confrontation underscored growing frustration among commuters who continue to face daily gridlocks near key transit points.

According to the complaint submitted by the party despite the presence of designated auto-rickshaw stands near Kalyan railway station drivers allegedly occupy roads near Deepak Hotel, Vikas Hotel, and Santosh Hotel, leading to severe bottlenecks. This unauthorized clustering forces commuters to struggle for rickshaws at official stands while traffic flow remains heavily disrupted.

The complaint further highlights rampant fare-related violations and overloading practices. Rickshaw drivers are accused of refusing short-distance passenger instead prioritizing longer routes for higher earnings. In several instances vehicles were found carrying passengers beyond permissible limits.

Additionally, commuters have reported arbitrary fare hikes post 10 PM, a time when the presence of traffic personnel is said to be minimal. These practices have not only inconvenienced passengers but also raised serious concerns about safety and regulatory enforcement.

Traffic congestion is further aggravated during night hours due to the presence of private tourist buses parked along key routes such as Sahajanand Chowk, Agra Road, and Murbad Road. These buses often stationed along the roadside, significantly reduce carriageway space and choke vehicular movement.

The situation near the station premises becomes even more chaotic as private buses enter the already congested zone, bringing traffic to a near standstill.

Shiv Sena leaders alleged that traffic police personnel are frequently absent at crucial junctions leaving traffic management largely in the hands of wardens. They also pointed out poor enforcement of one-way traffic rules across the city.

Along with Vijay Salvi, city chief Bala Parab, group leader Umesh Borgavankar, Dutta Khandagale, and former corporator Daya Shetty met ACP Kiran Balwarkar and Traffic In-charge Milind Jhogde demanding immediate corrective measures and the implementation of a robust traffic management plan.

Responding to the allegations, Traffic In-charge Milind Jhogde attributed part of the problem to ongoing Smart City works near Kalyan station. He stated that the lack of designated parking space has forced rickshaw drivers to park haphazardly.

Action is ongoing against violations of one-way rules and illegal parking by travel buses. We are making continuous efforts to ensure that traffic congestion is minimized Jhogde said.

With traffic congestion worsening by the day, coupled with alleged administrative lapses and unregulated transport practices, commuters in Kalyan continue to bear the brunt. All eyes are now on the administration to see whether decisive action will be taken to restore order on the city’s roads.

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court flagged serious lapses in the police probe but refused to grant bail to an accused in a sexual assault case, observing that the investigation was not conducted “in proper manner.”

According to the prosecution, the complainant met the accused through a dating application in 2021, following which they remained in contact and met on multiple occasions.

She has alleged that he subjected her to non-consensual sexual acts during visits to Delhi and Mumbai, recorded intimate moments without her consent, and later circulated those images and videos to her family members and colleagues after she ended the relationship.

On her complaint, Pant Nagar Police Station had registered an FIR under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Information Technology Act.

The defence advocate, Ali Kaashif Khan Deshmukh, argued that the FIR itself reflected a consensual relationship between two adults and that there was no independent material to substantiate allegations of force. It was also contended that the arrest was illegal as the grounds of arrest were not furnished.

Prosecutor Veera Shinde and complainant’s advocate Tanay Mandot, however, relied on WhatsApp chats, witness statements and an email allegedly sent by the accused admitting that he had shared the intimate material with the complainant’s family. They argued that these materials clearly indicated that the relationship was not consensual.

Mandot pointed out that despite the allegations of circulating the complainant’s photos and videos to her family, the police had not seized the mobile phone of the accused.

Justice R M Joshi noted significant shortcomings in the investigation, particularly the delay in seizing crucial evidence such as the complainant’s mobile phone.

“This therefore indicates that the investigation has not been done here in this case in proper manner,” the court observed, directing that its order be forwarded to superior officers for “appropriate consideration”.

Despite these lapses, the court held that the material collected during the investigation prima facie supported the prosecution’s case. It rejected the defence argument that the relationship was consensual, observing that the accused’s conduct, especially the act of circulating private images, pointed to coercion rather than a “love affair.”

“Having regard to the serious nature of offence… this is not a fit case to grant bail,” the court said, dismissing the application.