Connect with us
Wednesday,25-February-2026
Breaking News

Business

Banking services disrupted as bank employees go on nationwide strike demanding five-day work week

Published

on

New Delhi, Jan 27: Bank employees across the country went on strike on Tuesday to protest for their demands, including the immediate implementation of a five-day work week in the sector, leading to widespread disruption of banking services, including cash deposits, withdrawals, cheque clearances and other routine transactions.

The nationwide strike was called by the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU).

In Gujarat’s Vadodara, employees of nationalised banks joined the strike in large numbers. Protesters said that memoranda regarding the demand for a five-day work week had been submitted to the government on multiple occasions, but no concrete steps had been taken so far, forcing employees to resort to a strike. Due to the agitation, customers faced inconvenience as several bank branches remained closed or operated with minimal staff.

A protesting employee said: “More than eight lakh bank employees across India are participating in today’s strike. Our demand for a five-day banking week has been pending since 2015. Institutions such as the LIC, state governments and the Central government already follow a five-day work week. We were assured that banks would also shift to this system, but nothing has been implemented yet.”

In West Bengal’s Cooch Behar, bank employees’ unions held protests in front of the State Bank of India and other banks, reiterating their demand for a five-day work week.

A protester said: “Banks across the world and most offices in India, whether under the Central or state governments, function for five days a week. From the Reserve Bank of India to NABARD and LIC, all follow a five-day schedule, but nationalised and private banks have been left out. We had an agreement with the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) on this issue.”

Similar scenes were witnessed in Murshidabad district, where banks and ATM branches in Berhampore and other areas remained closed. Posters highlighting the demands of the bank unions were displayed outside bank premises.

A protester said the demand for five-day banking had been pending for nearly three years and was repeatedly postponed by the government.

“The government keeps saying it will be implemented soon, but nothing has happened so far. That is why we are protesting today,” he said.

In Uttar Pradesh’s Ghazipur district, over 10,000 bank employees from nearly 250 banks joined the nationwide strike, disrupting transactions worth over Rs 150 crore. Banking activities across the district came to a standstill, causing inconvenience to customers and businesses alike.

In Lucknow, All India Bank Officers’ Confederation (AIBOC) Senior Vice-President Ramnath Shukla said: “There is only one demand, and that is five-day banking. This demand has been ongoing for the past ten years. When the second and fourth Saturdays were declared holidays, it was promised that the remaining Saturdays would also be closed in the next settlement. Other departments were given five-day working without even demanding it.”

Indian Bank employee Anshika Singh Visen said: “In the last bipartite settlement, it was decided that bankers would be given five-day banking, with work from Monday to Friday and weekends off. However, while other proposals were accepted, the five-day banking proposal was not implemented.”

In Chandigarh, the one-day strike also affected normal banking operations. Bank employees staged protests outside bank branches, raising slogans in support of their demand for a five-day work week.

In Chhattisgarh’s Raipur, around 25,000 bank employees from nearly 2,500 banks participated in the strike. Banking services across the state were severely affected as employees gathered in large numbers to protest and press for their long-pending demand.

In Patna, Punjab National Bank employee Dimple said the strike was not an “out-of-work” protest.

“The government had agreed under the bipartite settlement that five-day banking would be implemented within six months. However, even after two years, the demand has not been fulfilled. The RBI, the SIDBI, the SEBI, and the NABARD all function for five days. We want the same to be implemented in banks immediately,” she said.

Another PNB employee, Ritika, said: “The 12th Bipartite Settlement clearly stated that five-day banking would be implemented within six months. It has been two years since the agreement, but nothing has been done. That is why we are on strike today.”

In Rajasthan’s Dholpur, banks across the district remained completely closed, severely affecting essential services such as cash transactions, deposits, withdrawals and cheque clearances, causing significant inconvenience to the public.

Business

Maha govt presents supplementary demands worth Rs 11,995 crore in Assembly

Published

on

Mumbai, Feb 24: Amid strain on state finances, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who holds the charge of planning and finance departments, on Tuesday tabled the supplementary demands worth Rs 11,995 crore for the remaining period of the fiscal 2025-26.

Of the Rs 11,995 crore, the state government has earmarked Rs 3,112.85 crore to meet the expenses incurred on the concession given in the electricity tariff to Agriculture pump, power loom and textile consumers in the state, and Rs 803.94 crore has been proposed as incentives to small, medium, large industries and mega projects under the package scheme of incentives.

The government has proposed Rs 4,792.02 crore for transferring the loan amount to the state power distribution company, Mahavitaran, which has been received from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank for the solar agriculture pump scheme. This allocation is aimed at pushing the government’s plan to use 52 per cent renewable energy by 2030 under the net zero mission.

The government has also proposed Rs 1,431.05 crore as an additional fund as part of the Central share for the implementation of the Jal Jeevan mission. In March 2025, Ajit Pawar had presented the budget with a revenue deficit of Rs 45,890 crore.

In June 2025, the government presented the supplementary demands worth Rs 57,509.71 crore, crossing the revenue deficit of Rs one lakh crore.

In the Winter Session during December 2025, with supplementary demands of Rs 75,286.37 crore, the revenue deficit had already touched the Rs two lakh crore mark. In addition to the revenue deficit of Rs 45,891 crore, the budget 2025-26 had projected that Maharashtra’s debt burden is set to rise to Rs 9.32 lakh crore. In Tuesday’s supplementary demands, the state government has not only refrained from proposing any new and additional expenses but has focused solely on Power subsidies for farmers and Industry incentives.

CM Fadnavis will present the state budget for the year 2026-27 on March 6. He has already announced in the press conference on Sunday that there could be strict measures to maintain financial discipline.

Earlier, speaking at the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting, the Chief Minister had said that the state is on track to generate 16 gigawatts (GW) of solar power by the end of this year. By 2032, the state aims to generate an additional 45 GW, with 70 per cent coming from solar. Renewable energy, which stood at 13 per cent four years ago, is projected to reach 52 per cent by 2030,” he said.

Following Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision, the state launched Asia’s largest decentralised solar scheme.

By shifting the entire agricultural load to solar power and establishing a dedicated company for farmer supply, the state is making every agricultural feeder independent.

“The cost of supplying power to farmers has dropped from Rs 8 to less than Rs 3 per unit. This transition is not only helping farmers but also reducing the financial burden on industries and households,” the Chief Minister noted.

The government is advancing a capital outlay for pumped storage hydro projects (combined capacity of 5,630 MW) with an estimated total investment of Rs 24,631 crore.

Continue Reading

Business

Precious metals surge over growing geopolitical tensions

Published

on

Mumbai, Feb 23: Gold and silver prices surged significantly on Monday, amid growing geopolitical tensions and the US dollar’s steep fall.

MCX gold April futures gained 1.83 per cent to Rs 1,59,749 per 10 grams on an intra-day basis. Meanwhile, MCX silver March futures gained 5.10 per cent to Rs 2,65,836 per kg.

Earlier in the day, gold had jumped 2 per cent while silver soared 6 per cent. Analysts attributed the surge to geopolitical tensions as US President Donald Trump’s 10-day deadline for a “meaningful deal” with Iran drew closer.

Iran has indicated it is prepared to make concessions on its nuclear programme in talks with the US in return for the lifting of sanctions and recognition of its right to enrich uranium, as it seeks to avert a US attack.

Further, the dollar fell after the US Supreme Court struck down a vast swathe of President Trump’s tariffs on Friday.

“The US Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a large swath of Trump’s tariffs has weakened his ability to threaten and impose tariffs at a moment’s notice, but it won’t end gnawing uncertainty for trade partners or companies,” said Manav Modi, Commodities Analyst, Motilal Oswal Financial services Ltd.

“Silver is witnessing a large draw of inventories from all warehouses especially, Comex very significantly indicating the tightness in supply and surge in demand as China remains shut,” the analyst said.

Concerns over slowing US economic growth are also supporting gold’s safe-haven appeal. The US GDP rose 1.4 per cent annually in the fourth quarter, down from 4.4 per cent in the July-September quarter and 3.8 per cent in the April-June quarter.

“Gold has support at Rs 1,54,400 and Rs 1,53,150 while resistance at Rs 1,59,100 and Rs 1,60,600. MCX silver has support at Rs 2,48,800 and Rs 2,42,000, and resistance is at Rs 2,57,700 and Rs 2,63,620,” an analyst said.

Markets remain keen on data from US factory orders, cues on consumer confidence data, and US Producer Price Index (PPI) data.

Continue Reading

Business

RCOM loan fraud: Anil Ambani files affidavit in SC; reiterates not to leave country

Published

on

New Delhi, Feb 19: Industrialist Anil D. Ambani has filed an undertaking/compliance affidavit before the Supreme Court reiterating that he will not leave the country without prior permission of the apex court in connection with the ongoing probe into alleged large-scale bank loan frauds linked to Reliance Communications Ltd (RCOM) and its group entities.

The affidavit has been filed in a pending public interest litigation (PIL) seeking a court-monitored probe into the allegations that more than Rs 1.50 lakh crore of debt of the Ambani-led RCOM group has been written off and that funds were siphoned off through multiple shell companies.

The affidavit formally reiterates the oral undertaking recorded before the apex court on February 4, when senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing on his behalf, assured that Ambani would not leave India without prior permission of the top court.

“By way of the present affidavit, I formally reiterate and place on record the said statement by virtue of the present affidavit as an undertaking before this Hon’ble Court,” Ambani stated.

He further deposed on oath: “That I have not left India since July 2025, i.e., since the inception of the present investigations, and presently have no plan or intention to travel outside India.”

He added that if any requirement of foreign travel arises, he would seek prior leave and permission of the Supreme Court before undertaking such travel.

Asserting that he is not a flight risk, the affidavit states: “In view of the above conduct, undertakings, and continued cooperation, it is evident that I am not a flight risk and have no intention, whatsoever, to evade the process of law.”

Ambani also stated that he has been fully cooperating with the investigating agencies. “That I, with utmost bona fide, have been fully cooperating with the investigating agencies in connection with the ongoing investigations and continue to extend complete cooperation,” the affidavit reads.

Referring to the ongoing probe under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, he stated that examination under Section 50 of the PMLA is presently being conducted during the pendency of proceedings before the apex court.

“That I have been summoned by the Directorate of Enforcement to appear on 26.02.2025 and I undertake to appear and join the investigation on the said date,” the affidavit said, while also undertaking to fully cooperate with the authorities and “preventing any suggestion of evasion or selective presentation of facts.”

Clarifying his role in the group companies under scrutiny, Ambani submitted: “That I respectfully state that my role in the concerned companies had been that of a Non-Executive Director only, and I was not involved in the day-to-day management or operational affairs of the said companies.”

In the affidavit sworn on February 18, he stated: “That the present affidavit is being filed to ensure clarity, completeness, and procedural transparency in the judicial record with an intent that this Hon’ble Court remains seized of the broader issues arising from the same factual matrix.”

Ambani’s undertaking comes against the backdrop of the Supreme Court’s February 4 order, where a Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant had expressed serious concern over an “unexplained delay” by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in probing alleged bank loan frauds involving public funds estimated at around Rs 40,000 crore.

The CJI Kant-led Bench had directed the ED to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) of senior officers and asked both Central agencies to take the investigation to its “logical conclusion” in a time-bound manner, while making it clear that no coercive or harsh orders were being passed at that stage.

During the hearing, apprehensions were raised by advocate Prashant Bhushan that the key accused could flee the country before completion of the probe, following which an undertaking not to travel abroad without apex court permission was recorded.

The Supreme Court had also directed the ED and the CBI to file detailed status reports on the progress of their investigations and questioned why only a single FIR had been registered despite complaints from multiple lenders, observing that each complaint constitutes a separate transaction warranting independent examination.

Continue Reading

Trending