Connect with us
Thursday,10-September-2026
Breaking News

Maharashtra

Aurangzeb’s Tomb Cannot Be Demolished By Maharashtra Govt Despite Widespread Protests & Public Demands; Here’s Why

Published

on

Nagpur: The recent violence in Nagpur, triggered by demands for the demolition of Aurangzeb’s tomb in Maharashtra’s Khuldabad, has intensified debates over the monument’s existence. Clashes erupted on March 17 after protests by Bajrang Dal and VHP, who called for the removal of the tomb, citing Aurangzeb’s oppressive rule. The unrest escalated, leading to violent confrontations, police injuries and curfews in affected areas.

However, despite the growing demand, the Maharashtra government does not have the legal authority to demolish the tomb. The site is protected under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act (AMASR Act), 1958, and falls under the jurisdiction of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), making its demolition legally impossible without central approval.

What is the AMASR Act, 1958?

The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 was enacted to preserve sites of historical and cultural significance. Under this Act, any monument classified as a ‘Monument of National Importance’ is protected from alteration, damage or destruction. The ASI, which functions under the Union Ministry of Culture, is responsible for maintaining these monuments.

Once a monument is notified under this Act, neither state governments nor local authorities can modify or demolish it. Only the Central Government, through a detailed legal and administrative process, can decide to de-notify such sites.

Why Is Aurangzeb’s Tomb A Protected Monument?

Aurangzeb, the sixth Mughal emperor, died in 1707 in Ahmednagar (now Ahilya Nagar) and was buried in Khuldabad near the dargah of Sheikh Zainuddin, his spiritual guide. His tomb is considered historically and culturally significant for several reasons:

– Historical Importance – Aurangzeb ruled for nearly 50 years, shaping India’s political and cultural history. His burial site remains part of India’s historical heritage.

– Architectural Value – Unlike grand Mughal tombs, Aurangzeb’s simple resting place reflects his lifestyle and is an example of minimalist Mughal architecture.

– Cultural Significance – The tomb is part of the larger Khuldabad complex, which houses several important Sufi shrines and historical figures’ graves.

– Preservation of Heritage – The ASI protects such sites to maintain historical integrity and prevent the destruction of India’s cultural legacy.

Can the Maharashtra Government Order Its Demolition?

No, the Maharashtra government cannot order the demolition of Aurangzeb’s tomb because:

1. It is a National Monument – The site is classified under the AMASR Act, making it a Monument of National Importance.

2. Only the Central Government Has Authority – The state government has no jurisdiction to alter or de-notify the tomb. Any such decision lies with the Union Ministry of Culture.

3. Legal Consequences – Any attempt to demolish the tomb would be unlawful and could lead to legal action against the state government.

4. International Reputation – Destroying a protected historical site could damage India’s global image as a country that values its diverse heritage.

What Has The Maharashtra Government Said?

During the inauguration of Maharashtra’s first Shivaji Maharaj temple earlier this month, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis acknowledged public sentiments against Aurangzeb but stated that legal constraints prevent any action against the tomb. “It is protected by the ASI, and we must follow the law,” he said. However, he assured that Maharashtra would only glorify Shivaji Maharaj, not Aurangzeb.

Despite political and public pressure, Aurangzeb’s tomb remains protected under Indian law. The Maharashtra government lacks the authority to demolish it, as it is a Monument of National Importance under the ASI. Any decision regarding its status rests solely with the Central Government. The Nagpur violence has intensified the debate, but legally, the demand remains unfeasible under current heritage laws.

Crime

Pune group seeks action against trolls targeting woman who complained against influencer Santosh Pandit

Published

on

Pune, Sep 10: A group of people have approached the Pune Police seeking action against social media users who allegedly posted derogatory and objectionable comments targeting a woman who had lodged a complaint against social media influencer Santosh Pandit, police said on Thursday.

Pandit has been accused of making allegedly derogatory remarks against Maharashtra Minister Chandrakant Patil and Pune Municipal Corporation corporator Mitali Kuldeep Salvekar.

Following a complaint filed by Sarika Kamble, who works with the Pune Municipal Corporation, a case was registered against Pandit at the Kothrud police station.

The issue took a further turn after members of the Bhau Foundation approached the Kothrud police station on Monday, seeking action against social media users who allegedly targeted Kamble after she filed the complaint against the influencer.

The organisation alleged that Kamble became the target of derogatory remarks and abusive comments on social media simply because she approached the police over remarks that she considered offensive and objectionable.

Tanisha Patil of Bhau Foundation condemned the derogatory and objectionable comments made against Kamble through social media and sought strict action against the trolls.

“We condemn the manner in which derogatory comments have been made through social media. Police should take strict action against such trolls. We will also lodge a complaint with Meta in this regard,” Patil said.

The organisation said that individuals should not be subjected to online abuse or personal attacks for approaching law enforcement authorities and raising concerns over remarks they find offensive. It urged the police to take appropriate action against the social media users involved in the alleged online harassment of Kamble.

The Bhau Foundation said it would also pursue the matter with Meta, the parent company of social media platforms including Facebook and Instagram, seeking action over the allegedly objectionable content targeting Kamble.

Santosh Pandit was arrested from his residence in Pune on September 3 in connection with a case of posting obscene and sexually suggestive content targeting Minister Patil and corporator Mitali Kuldeep Salvekar.

According to the complaint, Pandit allegedly uploaded objectionable posts and videos on his YouTube account, ‘@SantoshPandit6278’, targeting Chandrakant Patil and Mitali Salvekar.

Officials said that legal proceedings are underway, and further details are awaited.

Continue Reading

Maharashtra

Maharashtra SIR: Congress MLA seeks deadline extension for electoral roll corrections

Published

on

Mumbai, Sep 9: Congress MLA Amin Patel wrote to Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) S Chockalingam, raising serious concerns over the large-scale deletion of voters from electoral rolls in the Mumbadevi Assembly constituency following the recent Special Intensive Revision (SIR) drive.

In a letter to the CEO, Patel highlighted that nearly 95,732 voters have been deleted from the draft electoral roll published on August 31, 2026. While official grounds cite absent, shifted, duplicate, or deceased voters (ASDD), Patel alleged that poor outreach and lack of proper communication by Booth Level Officers (BLOs) were significant contributing factors.

“As of September 8, 2026, not a single Form No 6 (used for re-enrollment and new registrations) had been accepted by BLOs in the region. No official notices were served to voters facing electoral roll anomalies or unmapped status to appear for hearings. Citizens attempting to contact assigned BLOs faced unanswered calls or switched-off phones, causing unnecessary distress to residents trying to rectify their voter status. With the upcoming Ganeshotsav festival season, BLOs are expected to be occupied with festival-related duties, creating a high likelihood that citizens will miss the current submission deadlines,” said Patel.

To ensure no eligible voter is disenfranchised, Patel requested an urgent deadline extension within legal parameters. He has demanded that for submission of Form 6 (Re-enrollment & New Registration), the time period be extended from September 30, 2026, to October 31, 2026 and for Anomaly & Unmapped Voter Hearings from October 29, 2026, to November 30, 2026.

Patel urged the Chief Electoral Officer to sympathetically consider the gravity of the situation and take immediate corrective measures.

Patel’s request comes after the exclusion of 2.07 crore voters in the draft voter list released on August 31. Of the final categorisation of the 2.07 crore uncollected Enumeration Forms (EFs), they include 75.52 lakh: Absent or untraceable voters, 76.80 lakh: Permanently shifted voters, 34.81 lakh: Deceased voters, 17.63 lakh: Duplicate entries or voters already registered elsewhere and 2.23 lakh: Other reasons.

Chockalingam said that 2.07 crore being in the “Uncollectable Enumeration Forms (accounting for 21.15% of Maharashtra’s 9.78 crore electorates) does not mean permanent removal immediately; it marks exclusion from the Draft Electoral Roll during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) 2026 drive in Maharashtra which began on July 1. “I appeal to every voter to check the draft electoral roll,” said Chockalingam.

“Do not merely look at the statewide figures. Check whether your own name is on the list and whether your details are correct. If your name is missing, apply for inclusion. If there is an error, request a correction. If there is an issue regarding the removal of a name, you can submit Form 6 to apply for re-inclusion. The draft list is not the final list; a complete process of claims and objections will take place before the final voter list is released,” he added.

Continue Reading

Business

Sugar prices curb: Maharashtra sugarcane crushing season set to begin on Oct 15​

Published

on

Mumbai, Sep 9: Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis-led high-level committee on Wednesday decided to advance the upcoming sugarcane crushing season for 2026-27 to October 15.

The state government’s decision comes when soaring sugar prices during the festive season have strained household budgets across Maharashtra.

The state government hopes the commencement of sugarcane crushing season from October 15 instead of November 1 demanded by sugar factories will stabilise the market and ensure an adequate supply of sugar.

This marks an earlier rollout compared to previous operational years, following seasons that started on November 1, 2025, and November 15, 2024, respectively.

The meeting was attended by Co-operation Minister Babasaheb Patil, Deputy Chief Minister Sunetra Pawar, former Minister Dilip Walse Patil, along with legislators and representatives from factory associations.

The move comes as retail sugar prices jumped to Rs 70–75 per kg in August due to a domestic supply crunch caused by lower production last season.

Normally, the crushing season commences in November.

However, with major festivals like Navratri, Dussehra, and Diwali approaching—and following advisories from the Central government to top-producing states — the Maharashtra administration decided to begin operations nearly a month early to prevent further price spikes.

The proposed October 15 start date has, however, met with opposition from sugar mill owners and farmers.

Industry representatives said that starting the crushing process before November is financially disadvantageous for both factories and growers due to lower sugarcane maturity and sugar recovery rates at that time of the year.

Despite the pushback from millers, the state government remains focused on controlling inflation and stabilising supply before the peak festive period.

Maharashtra Cooperation Minister Babasaheb Patil said, “The decision to advance the sugarcane crushing season from October 15 was taken in the wake of festive season and also to avoid damage to the standing sugarcane.”

According to crop estimations prepared by the Agriculture Department and MITCON, the state expects sugarcane cultivation across 15.43 to 15.48 lakh hectares.

Total cane production is projected to reach 1,238 to 1,250 lakh metric tonnes (LMT), yielding an estimated 990 to 1,000 LMT of cane for crushing.

Net sugar production is anticipated to hover between 96.45 and 97.58 LMT at a net recovery rate of 9.75 per cent, after diverting nearly 15 LMT of sugar equivalent toward ethanol production.

Reviewing the performance of the preceding 2025–26 crushing season (as of August 31, 2026), official records revealed that 210 sugar mills (102 cooperative and 108 private) processed 1,045 LMT of sugarcane.

Minister Patil said that the arrears payable by the sugar mills towards Fair and Remunerative Price are of the order of Rs 200 crore.

He added that the state government is taking action against such mills for clearing the dues.

He told that these mills won’t be entitled to get crushing license for the upcoming season.

Continue Reading

Trending