National News
WhatsApp cannot be used as a substitute by police to serve notice to accused: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has ordered the police to not use WhatsApp or other electronic modes as an alternative or substitute mode to serve notice to the accused under Section 41A of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) or Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
Section 41A, CrPc or Section 35, BNSS provides for the issuance of notice to accused, whose immediate arrest may not be required, to appear before the police or at such other place as may be specified.
The Bench of Justice MM Sundresh and Justice Rajesh Bindal ordered all the States and Union Territories to issue a Standing Order to their respective police departments asking them to issue such notices only through the prescribed mode of service under the CrPC or BNSS.
“It is made amply clear that service of notice through WhatsApp or other electronic modes cannot be considered or recognised as an alternative or substitute to the mode of service recognised and prescribed under the CrPC, 1973/BNSS, 2023,” the Court ordered.
The Court passed the direction in the Satendar Kumar Antil case in which it has previously passed landmark directions to prevent unnecessary arrests of accused or suspects. Since then, the Court has been monitoring the implementation of its orders.
The top court was recently informed that Haryana government has permitted police to serve Section 41A. CrPC or Section 35, BNSS notices through WhatsApp, e-mail, SMS or any other electronic mode.
On January 21, Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra, the amicus curiae in the Satendar Kumar Antil case, had flagged that the police should not be allowed to circumvent the mandate of Section 41A, CrPC or Section 35, BNSS in this manner, by serving notices through WhatsApp or other electronic modes instead of following the normal mode of service.
It was also submitted that the top court earlier had upheld a Delhi High Court ruling that the notice served through WhatsApp or other electronic modes is not contemplated as a mode of service under the CrPC.
The Court accepted the submission and issued an order directing the police to strictly comply with the directions issued by it.
Further, the Court directed that notices to witnesses must also only be served through the modes prescribed under the CrPC or BNSS.
“All the States/UTs must issue an additional Standing Order to their respective Police machinery to issue notices under Section 160 of CrPC, 1973/Section 179 of BNSS, 2023 and Section 175 of CrPC, 1973/Section 195 of BNSS, 2023 to the accused persons or otherwise, only through the mode of service as prescribed under the CrPC, 1973/BNSS, 2023,” it ordered.
Moreover, the Bench also directed that all High Courts must hold meetings of their respective Committees to ensure the implementation of the top court’s decisions on a monthly basis. This is to ensure compliance of both past and future directions issued by the apex court at all levels.
It further asked the High Courts to ensure that monthly compliance reports are submitted by the concerned authorities.
The Court will hear the matter next on March 18.
National News
Bombay HC Slams Son’s Plea To Stop Elderly Parents Using His Home, Orders Him To Provide ‘Respect, Love And Care’

Mumbai, November 14: Expressing strong displeasure over a son’s plea seeking to restrain his elderly parents from using his Mumbai residence during their visits for medical treatment, the Bombay High Court on Thursday directed him to ensure that they are treated with “utmost respect, love and care.”
The son had approached the HC challenging a January 20, 2018, order of the City Civil Court, which had refused to grant an injunction preventing his parents—currently residing in Kolhapur—from using his transit accommodation at Goregaon (East) whenever they travelled to Mumbai for treatment. The HC described the appeal as a “sorry state of affairs.”
“This is one more instance and sorry state of affairs where a son instead of discharging the moral duty of taking care of his ailing and aged parents has filed a suit seeking restrain order,” the court observed, lamenting a decline in moral values.
Referring to cultural ideals, the court said: “The moral values inculcated in our culture have fallen to such an extent that we have forgotten Shravan Kumar who took his parents for pilgrimage and on the way laid down his life.”
The judge remarked that caring for parents “is not just a sacred and moral duty, it’s a labour of love,” emphasising that honouring and supporting them is akin to “honouring God himself.” The court noted the harsh irony that “parents can take care of ten children, but sometimes ten children cannot take care of their parents.”
Without delving into the merits of the property dispute, the court said the parents must be cared for by their three sons—one in Mumbai (the appellant), another in Airoli, and the third in Kolhapur. The senior couple requires regular treatment in Mumbai at J.J. Hospital, as well as in Panvel and Kolhapur.
As an interim arrangement, the court issued a series of directions. It ordered that whenever the parents need treatment in Mumbai, they must inform the son in advance. On the day of their arrival, “the plaintiff-son or his wife will go and receive the defendants-parents at the place of embarkment and take them” to his residence. He or a family member must accompany them to the hospital or clinic and bear all medical expenses.
After treatment, the son must escort them back to their residence and ensure they are treated with “utmost respect, love and care.” He was also directed to make suitable travel arrangements whenever the couple wishes to visit their other sons in Panvel or Kolhapur.
Any breach of these directions, the court warned, would invite contempt proceedings. The court added that the directions were “illustrative,” and the son must ensure no “inconvenience or harm of any nature whatsoever” is caused to his parents.
Business
Panvel Municipal Corporation Clears ₹48.40 Crore Gadhi River Bridge Project To Ease Traffic Congestion On Panvel–Karanjade Stretch

Panvel, November 14: In a major infrastructure push aimed at reducing traffic congestion and improving connectivity, the Panvel Municipal Corporation has cleared a proposal to construct a new bridge over the Gadhi River near the Karanjade sewage pumping station.
Municipal Commissioner and Administrator Mangesh Chitale approved the plan following demands raised by Panvel MLA Prashant Thakur and Uran MLA Mahesh Baldi, who highlighted the daily inconvenience faced by commuters travelling between Panvel, Karanjade and Vadghar’s CIDCO colonies.
According to civic officials, the existing bridge toward Karanjade routinely experiences heavy traffic, often resulting in prolonged congestion. With the upcoming Navi Mumbai International Airport expected to increase traffic volumes even further, the civic body believes the new bridge will be a “critical link” on the Panvel–Karanjade stretch.
The project, with an estimated cost of Rs 48.40 crore, received administrative approval in the General Body. Construction is expected to begin soon.
As per the sanctioned plan, the bridge will feature four lanes, a length of 240 metres, and a width of 21.5 metres. “It will connect Panvel Municipal Corporation’s 40-feet-wide road on the eastern side with CIDCO’s 20-metre-wide road leading to the Karanjade node on the western side.
This connection will significantly streamline traffic and support future vehicular growth,” said Additional Commissioner Ganesh Shete.
For the project, No Objection Certificates (NOCs) will be sought from CIDCO, the Water Resources Department, and the Public Works Department. The conceptual design will undergo technical review and approval by either IIT Mumbai or VJTI Mumbai, City Engineer Sanjay Katekar confirmed.
The civic administration expects the bridge to provide major relief to residents and improve overall mobility in the rapidly developing Panvel–Karanjade region.
National News
Congress, BJP win two seats each as results of eight Assembly bypolls show mixed picture

New Delhi, Nov 14: The results of the Assembly bye-elections held on November 11 delivered a mixed mandate, with both the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) winning two seats each out of the eight that went to polls. Regional parties also held their ground, retaining influence in their respective strongholds.
The Congress registered two significant victories in Rajasthan and Telangana.
In Rajasthan’s Anta constituency, Pramod Jain Bhaya defeated the BJP’s Morpall Suman by 15,612 votes, securing 69,571 votes.
In Telangana’s Jubilee Hills, the Congress wrested the seat from the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS). Congress candidate V. Naveen Yadav defeated BRS’ Maganti Sunitha by 24,729 votes — the highest victory margin in the constituency’s history.
The BJP, meanwhile, claimed two major wins in Jammu & Kashmir and Odisha.
In J&K’s Nagrota, BJP candidate Devyani Rana secured a commanding win with a margin of 24,647 votes.
In Odisha’s Nuapada, BJP’s Jay Dholakia defeated Congress candidate Ghasi Ram Majhi by a massive 83,748 votes, while the Biju Janata Dal finished third.
Regional parties demonstrated strong performances across several states.
In J&K’s Budgam, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) emerged victorious, with Aga Syed Muntazir Mehdi defeating his nearest National Conference rival Aga Syed Mahmood Al-Mosavi by 4,478 votes. The BJP’s Aga Syed Mohsin Mosvi finished a distant sixth with just 2,619 votes.
In Mizoram, the Mizo National Front (MNF) retained its hold on the Dampa seat, where Dr. R. Lalthangliana won by a narrow margin of 562 votes.
In Punjab, the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) successfully defended the Tarn Taran Assembly seat. Here, AAP candidate Harmeet Singh Sandhu retained the Tarn Taran Assembly seat, defeating his nearest rival, Sukhwinder Kaur of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), who was leading in the initial rounds of counting, by more than 12,000 votes.
In Jharkhand’s Ghatshila, the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) secured a dominant victory. Somesh Chandra Soren defeated BJP’s Babulal Soren, son of former Chief Minister Champai Soren, by a margin of 38,524 votes, polling 1,04,794 votes against the BJP candidate’s 66,270. All other 11 candidates forfeited their deposits.
-
Crime3 years agoClass 10 student jumps to death in Jaipur
-
Maharashtra1 year agoMumbai Local Train Update: Central Railway’s New Timetable Comes Into Effect; Check Full List Of Revised Timings & Stations
-
Maharashtra1 year agoMumbai To Go Toll-Free Tonight! Maharashtra Govt Announces Complete Toll Waiver For Light Motor Vehicles At All 5 Entry Points Of City
-
Maharashtra1 year agoFalse photo of Imtiaz Jaleel’s rally, exposing the fooling conspiracy
-
National News1 year agoMinistry of Railways rolls out Special Drive 4.0 with focus on digitisation, cleanliness, inclusiveness and grievance redressal
-
Maharashtra1 year agoMaharashtra Elections 2024: Mumbai Metro & BEST Services Extended Till Midnight On Voting Day
-
National News1 year agoJ&K: 4 Jawans Killed, 28 Injured After Bus Carrying BSF Personnel For Poll Duty Falls Into Gorge In Budgam; Terrifying Visuals Surface
-
Crime1 year agoBaba Siddique Murder: Mumbai Police Unable To Get Lawrence Bishnoi Custody Due To Home Ministry Order, Says Report
