Maharashtra
The AM Residency Built on Waqf Property: A Builder’s Example of Dishonesty? Or Muslim Leaders’ Compromise with the Mission Waqf Property ?

Mumbai: In our previous report, we explained how corrupt officials and builders are colluding to sell homes meant for poor footpath dwellers to the rich. After the Mumbai Press report, the government authorities took action, and a team of BMC officers arrived at the AM Residency in Mazgaon. Afterward, a man named Sheru started misleading the higher authorities. According to the information received, the honest builder of AM Residency, Salim Motorwala, in his statement, informed BMC officials that he had given homes in his complex to all 20 slum dwellers and had shown the allotment letters for all 20 homes to the BMC officials. However, he did not mention that only the allotment letters were given, and the actual homes were not provided. Later, Motorwala’s company transferred the ownership of those homes to the names of his relatives, making them the owners.
However, BMC’s final report is still pending, which will decide whether Motorwala’s group gets a clean chit or the poor slum dwellers receive homes.

Now, let us explain why all the Muslim leaders have remained silent spectators in the AM Residency case.
According to government documents, the 3,596 square meter land of AM Residency in Mazgaon was under the Maharashtra Waqf Board. This land was leased by the Maharashtra Collector to the Dawood Bhai Musa Bhai Jariwala Charity Trust for 99 years, so that the trust could serve the poor Muslims. The actual ownership of this land remained with the Maharashtra government, which gave it to the trust for 99 years, starting from 1882 and ending in 1978. After 1978, the trust and the Waqf Board were supposed to return the land to the Maharashtra government. However, it is rare in India that government land is returned honestly to the government. The same happened with this land. The trust and the Waqf Board kept their claim on the land, and in 2009, about 30 years later, the Waqf Board illegally gave this land to Salim Motorwala and his associate Suhail Khadir for redevelopment. In doing so, they seized thousands of crores of government property. This land had been allocated for building schools, colleges, or hospitals for Muslims, but the trust and Waqf Board kept the land unused for 99 years and then sold it to builders at throwaway prices, after taking bribes.
When Mumbai Press informed the Collector of Mumbai about this, he was shocked because he was unaware that the Waqf had sold the land to builders instead of returning it to the government, and the builders were constructing homes on it and selling them to Muslims for crores of rupees. Mumbai Press then informed Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who ordered an inquiry into the matter. When Mumbai Press tried to ask Salim Motorwala why, despite being a devout Muslim, he took control of Waqf property that was meant for the welfare of Muslims, he avoided commenting on the matter and did not provide any response.
Maharashtra
Mumbai HC Acquits All Convicted in 2006 Train Blasts Case; Death Sentences Overturned

Mumbai | July 21, 2025 — In a landmark verdict, the Bombay High Court has acquitted all 12 individuals previously convicted in the 2006 Mumbai local train serial bomb blasts case, reversing the 2015 judgment of the MCOCA special court which had handed out death and life sentences.
The case (G.R. No. 05/2006, MCOCA Special Case No. 21/2006) pertains to the horrific series of bomb blasts that rocked the Western Railway suburban trains in Mumbai on July 11, 2006, killing over 180 people and injuring more than 800.
On September 30, 2015, the special MCOCA court had sentenced:
- 5 accused to death,
- 7 accused to life imprisonment,
- while 1 accused was acquitted.
Following standard procedure, the death sentences were referred to the Bombay High Court for confirmation, and the convicted individuals filed appeals challenging their sentences.
A division bench of Justice Anil Kilor and Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar heard the matter extensively from *July 2024, with final arguments concluding on *January 27, 2025.
On July 21, 2025, the High Court delivered its judgment:
- Rejected the death reference,
- Allowed the appeals of all convicted individuals,
- Set aside the 2015 convictions and sentences passed by the MCOCA special court.
Representing the Government of India and the state of Maharashtra were Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Raja Thakare and Special Public Prosecutor Chimalkar, who argued for upholding the original verdict.
The Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), Maharashtra, has stated that it is currently analyzing the High Court’s detailed judgment. Consultations are underway with legal experts and special prosecutors to determine the next course of legal action, which may include an appeal to the Supreme Court.
The verdict has sparked significant public and legal interest, as it not only impacts one of the most devastating terror incidents in Mumbai’s history but also raises serious questions about the prosecution’s evidence and investigation.
Maharashtra
2006 Mumbai Train Blasts: Bombay High Court Acquits All 12 Accused, Slams Prosecution Over Lack of Evidence

Mumbai, July 21, 2025* — In a major legal development nearly two decades after the devastating 2006 Mumbai train bombings, the Bombay High Court has acquitted all 12 individuals previously convicted in the case. The court observed that the prosecution had “utterly failed” to establish their involvement, raising serious concerns about the integrity of the investigation and trial.
The division bench of Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and Gauri Godse delivered the verdict, overturning life sentences and death penalties handed down by a special court in 2015 under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). The court pointed to inconsistencies, procedural lapses, and weak evidence that failed to meet the standards required for a criminal conviction.
Background: One of India’s Deadliest Terror Attacks
On July 11, 2006, a series of coordinated blasts ripped through seven suburban trains on the Western Railway network during evening rush hour, killing 189 people and injuring over 800. The attack sent shockwaves across the country and led to a massive crackdown by law enforcement agencies.
Twelve men, said to be affiliated with the banned Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), were arrested and later convicted for their alleged role in planting explosives in pressure cookers inside train compartments.
Court’s Observations*
In its judgment, the High Court sharply criticized the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) for lapses in investigation. The bench noted that the prosecution’s case was primarily based on confessional statements and lacked independent corroboration. Many of the claims, the court found, were not backed by physical evidence or reliable witness testimony.
The judges also questioned the delay in lodging the FIRs and the procedural irregularities in recording confessions under MCOCA. They emphasized the need for fair investigation and warned that justice cannot be achieved through shortcuts.
Legal and Human Rights Repercussions*
The acquittal has sparked renewed debate over wrongful convictions, custodial torture allegations, and the functioning of India’s anti-terror laws. Several civil rights groups have welcomed the verdict, calling for accountability of officials responsible for the flawed investigation.
Meanwhile, the state government has expressed concern over the judgment and is reportedly reviewing options for a possible appeal in the Supreme Court.
Voices from the Courtroom*
Outside the courtroom, family members of the acquitted men broke down in tears, many having spent nearly 17 years behind bars. One of the defense lawyers stated, “Justice has been delayed, but not denied. This judgment exposes the danger of rushing to convictions in sensitive cases.”
On the other side, victims’ families expressed disappointment and grief, saying the acquittals reopened wounds that had never fully healed.
Maharashtra
Bombay HC To Deliver Verdict In 2006 Mumbai Train Bombings Case Today

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court, on Monday, will pronounce judgment in the 2006 Mumbai train bombings case.
A special bench of Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak heard the the death confirmation pleas filed by the state government and the appeals by convicts.
Four of the accused who were awarded death sentences are Mohammad Faisal Shaikh, Ehtesham Siddiqui, Naveed Hussain Khan, Asif Khan, all of them bomb planters. The fifth accused sentenced to death, Kamal Ahamed Ansari, also an alleged bomb planter, died due to Covid in 2022.
The other seven – Tanvir Ahmed Ansari, Mohammad Majid Shafi, Shaikh Alam Shaikh, Mohd Sajid Ansari, Muzzammil Shaikh, Soheil Mehmood Shaikh and Zamir Ahmad Shaikh – have also approached the HC, challenging their life imprisonment.
About The Case
On July 11, 2006, RDX blasts at seven locations on the suburban rail network of Mumbai in a span of 11 minutes had claimed 189 lives and injured 827 commuters. After an eight-year-long trial, 12 out of the 13 accused were convicted. While five were given the death sentence, the remaining seven were sentenced to life imprisonment.
Initially, seven different FIRs were registered at local police stations. Considering the gravity of the offence, the case was transferred to the State Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) same month.
While 13 accused were arrested, 15 people were shown as wanted, some of them allegedly in Pakistan. One of the accused died while planting the bomb in the train and the other was shot dead in an encounter. The ATS, invoked the MCOCA and Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, and the chargesheet was filed in November 2006.
There were 192 prosecution witnesses and 51 defence witnesses and two court witnesses. As it was not possible to get all injured witnesses to court, the prosecution submitted 252 affidavits of the injured witnesses.
Special public prosecutors Raja Thakare and A. Chimalkar appeared for the State. The special bench commences hearing in July 2024. It reserved judgment in the pleas in January this year.
The special bench was constituted last year after Etheshaam Siddiqui, one of the convicts facing the death penalty, filed an application in the High Court seeking an early hearing and disposal of the appeals. The case has remained pending since a special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court awarded death sentences to five persons in 2015.
Eleven different benches commenced hearings but were unable to conclude.
-
Crime3 years ago
Class 10 student jumps to death in Jaipur
-
Maharashtra10 months ago
Mumbai Local Train Update: Central Railway’s New Timetable Comes Into Effect; Check Full List Of Revised Timings & Stations
-
Maharashtra9 months ago
Mumbai To Go Toll-Free Tonight! Maharashtra Govt Announces Complete Toll Waiver For Light Motor Vehicles At All 5 Entry Points Of City
-
Maharashtra10 months ago
False photo of Imtiaz Jaleel’s rally, exposing the fooling conspiracy
-
Crime9 months ago
Baba Siddique Murder: Mumbai Police Unable To Get Lawrence Bishnoi Custody Due To Home Ministry Order, Says Report
-
National News9 months ago
Ministry of Railways rolls out Special Drive 4.0 with focus on digitisation, cleanliness, inclusiveness and grievance redressal
-
Maharashtra8 months ago
Maharashtra Elections 2024: Mumbai Metro & BEST Services Extended Till Midnight On Voting Day
-
National News10 months ago
J&K: 4 Jawans Killed, 28 Injured After Bus Carrying BSF Personnel For Poll Duty Falls Into Gorge In Budgam; Terrifying Visuals Surface