Connect with us
Tuesday,07-October-2025
Breaking News

Crime

MP: Breakthrough in Deva Pardhi custodial death case; accused cop surrenders on eve of SC’s Oct 7 arrest deadline

Published

on

Bhopal, Oct 6: In a dramatic turn of events that underscores the Supreme Court’s unyielding push for accountability in custodial violence cases, one of the two key accused police officers in the tragic death of 26-year-old Deva Pardhi has surrendered to authorities in Madhya Pradesh, mere hours before the apex court’s self-imposed deadline for their arrest on October 7.

The development comes amid mounting judicial scrutiny and could prevent a high-stakes contempt showdown scheduled for tomorrow.

Town Inspector (TI) Sanjeet Singh Mawai, who had evaded capture for over a year, walked into the Badarwas police station in Shivpuri district late on Sunday evening, effectively ending a gruelling manhunt that had drawn sharp rebukes from the nation’s highest court.

This surrender follows the recent arrest of his co-accused, Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) Uttam Singh, nabbed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in Indore just over a week ago.

Mawai’s voluntary appearance is seen as a direct response to the Supreme Court’s October 7 ultimatum, potentially sparing senior officials – including state Chief Secretary, from being hauled into court for failing to comply with its directives.

The case, which has become a stark symbol of police impunity and the perils faced by marginalised communities in custody, originated in the dusty lanes of Guna district, Madhya Pradesh, on July 15, 2024.

Deva Pardhi, a young tribal man from the nomadic Pardhi community, was gearing up for what should have been the joyous culmination of his life — a traditional wedding procession to his bride’s village.

Dressed in his wedding finery, Deva and his uncle, Gangaram Pardhi, were bundled into a vehicle – a tractor and trolley in which they had to proceed for the ‘baraat.’ Police took them under the pretext of routine questioning in a petty theft case involving ₹8 lakh stolen from nearby Bhidra village.

Tragically, the very tractor-trolley meant to ferry the wedding party was repurposed by the police to transport the duo to the Myana Police Station, turning a day of celebration into one of unimaginable grief.

Hours later, the bridegroom Deva was dead, plunging the community in grief.

The official narrative from the Madhya Pradesh Police painted a picture of sudden misfortune; a fatal cardiac arrest in custody. However, Deva’s family, shattered and suspicious, pointed out brutal torture at the hands of the officers on duty.

Autopsy reports and eyewitness accounts from Gangaram, who survived the ordeal, painted a harrowing picture of beatings, electric shocks, and relentless interrogation tactics designed to extract confessions for crimes the duo had no connection to.

The incident’s fallout was immediate and visceral. Deva’s distraught bride, unable to bear the loss, attempted suicide by self-immolation outside the police station, only to be rushed to Guna District Hospital along with other grieving relatives who tried to follow suit.

Protests erupted across the region, with tribal rights activists decrying it as yet another instance of systemic violence against Adivasi communities, whose members are often stereotyped as habitual offenders and subjected to extrajudicial excesses.

The family’s desperate plea for justice landed in the Supreme Court, where a petition exposed glaring lapses in the initial Magisterial enquiry ordered by the state government — a probe that critics dismissed as a whitewash.

On May 15, 2025, a pivotal Bench led by Justice B.V. Nagarathna delivered a scathing indictment of the local police’s handling of the investigation.

Citing evidence of tampering, witness intimidation, and deliberate concealment, the court transferred the probe to the CBI and issued a crystal-clear mandate: “The police officials found responsible for the custodial death shall be arrested forthwith and not later than a period of one month.”

This order wasn’t just procedural; it was a clarion call against the “blue wall of silence” shielding errant officers, emphasising that custodial deaths erode the very foundation of constitutional rights under Article 21.

Yet, as weeks turned into months, compliance faltered. By September 2025, with neither Mawai nor Uttam Singh in custody despite their suspension on September 24 — four months after they allegedly went underground — the victim’s mother, in a bold act filed a contempt petition.

The plea accused the CBI and the Madhya Pradesh government of willful disobedience, alleging a nexus that allowed the accused to roam free while drawing salaries and even filing anticipatory bail applications.

The Supreme Court’s hearings in late September were nothing short of a judicial thunderbolt. On September 23, the Bench of Justices Nagarathna and R Mahadevan — known for their no-nonsense approach to human rights violations — pulled no punches.

“More than four months have passed, and the direction of the court has not been complied with. It appears that you are protecting the officers,” the Bench thundered at the state’s counsel.

Justice Nagarathna probed deeper: “You were impleaded as a party in the (May 15) order. This is contempt of the order of the Supreme Court by the State government. How can the State sanction salaries for persons who were directed to be arrested?”

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) K.M. Natraj, representing the CBI, and Aishwarya Bhati for the state, faced a barrage of questions.

ASG Raja Thakare detailed the agency’s exhaustive efforts; physical surveillance, financial transaction tracking, toll plaza vehicle monitoring, social media scrutiny, and raids on known hideouts. The CBI had even upped the ante with a ₹2 lakh reward per head for credible tips, announced on September 24. However, the Bench remained unmoved.

“What is the meaning of this? This is all eyewash,” Justice Nagarathna retorted, dismissing the measures as superficial.

Justice Mahadevan also expressed his ire, “You are part of the State administration. When a grave crime takes place, how can you wash away your responsibility? You are protecting the officers who were directed to be arrested. How can they have the audacity to file anticipatory bail pleas against an order of the Supreme Court?”

The court’s frustration peaked with accusations of “aggravated contempt.” It warned of summoning the CBI Director, the Madhya Pradesh Chief Secretary, and the Additional Superintendent of Police overseeing the probe.

“Your helplessness feels in the garb of protection,” Justice Nagarathna observed, rejecting pleas of operational hurdles. In a bid to jolt the system into action against the police, the Bench set a hard deadline: Arrests by October 7, or the Investigating Officer and the Additional Chief Secretary of the Home Department would be personally summoned on October 8.

The matter was listed for further hearing on September 26. On September 26, ASI Uttam Singh, 42, was apprehended in Indore after surrendering at a special CBI court. Sources indicate he had been holed up in the city, relying on a network of sympathisers, but the reward announcement and intensified surveillance forced his hand.

Interrogations revealed preliminary leads on Mawai’s movements, including cryptic social media posts hinting at his distress over the mounting heat.

By October 5, Intelligence pointed to Shivpuri as his likely bolt-hole, leading to his pre-dawn surrender. “He came in quietly, citing family pressure and fear of escalation,” a senior Shivpuri police official told reporters, adding that Mawai was immediately handed over to the CBI for custody remand.

Both officers now face charges under Sections 302 (murder), 330 (causing hurt to extort confession), and 193 (fabricating false evidence) of the IPC, alongside provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

In a parallel development, Guna police on October 5 nabbed dismissed Sub-Inspector Ramveer Singh Kushwaha, who had dodged arrest for over two-and-a-half years.

Kushwaha stands accused of witness tampering in the 2022 murder of Atmaram Pardhi — believed to be a relative of Deva — another case shrouded in controversy and stalled probes.

Despite securing bail in the murder charge from the Madhya Pradesh High Court, his anticipatory bail in the intimidation matter was pending. Acting on social media surveillance showing Kushwaha rallying supporters in Guna, Superintendent of Police Ankit Soni deployed a crack team that swooped in on Sunday night.

“This is a testament to zero tolerance for those undermining justice,” Soni stated, linking the arrest to broader efforts post the Supreme Court’s Guna scrutiny.

The Guna cluster of cases—encompassing Deva’s death, Atmaram’s unsolved killing, and the eight-year disappearance of Geeta (a potential witness in related matters)—highlights a disturbing pattern.

Activists point to the Pardhi community’s vulnerability, often targeted under draconian anti-nomad laws, with custodial deaths in Madhya Pradesh rising to 15 per cent in 2024 as per NCRB data.

As Deva’s mother, who has led a tireless campaign from her modest Bilakhedi home, awaits October 8, hearing, a sliver of hope pierces the grief.

Crime

Mumbai Hit-And-Run Case: 21-Year-Old Ruia College Student Dies After Being Abandoned On Road Following Accident At Sion

Published

on

Mumbai: A 21-year-old college student, Mayur Kishor Rai, pursuing his undergraduate studies at Ruia College in Matunga, tragically died in a hit-and-run accident on the evening of October 4. The incident occurred near the Sion Bridge incline on Dr. B.A. Road, Sion East. The Sion Police have registered a case and are investigating the matter.

According to the FIR, Mayur, a resident of Lallubhai Compound in Mankhurd, lived with his family and used to commute to college on a KTM Duke 250 motorcycle (MH-03-EJ-5365) registered in his sister Deepa’s name. On the day of the incident, Mayur left for college on the bike and informed his mother, Sunita Rai,45, a social worker, around 6:30 PM that he was on his way home.

However, at around 8:15 PM, Sunita received a call from an unknown person using Mayur’s mobile, informing her that his bike had met with an accident near Sion Bridge.

The family rushed to the location by taxi but could not find Mayur at the spot. While on their way to Sion Hospital, they spotted his motorcycle near the zebra crossing on Dr. B.A. Road, where police were already present. Upon getting down from the taxi, the family found Mayur lying unconscious beside a small tempo.

An ambulance called by the police arrived shortly, and Mayur was rushed to Sion Hospital. Unfortunately, the doctors declared him dead on arrival.

According to traffic police patrolling the area, some bystanders had informed them about the accident and mentioned that an injured person was being taken to the hospital in a tempo. The tempo in question bore the registration number MH-48-CB-3469.

Investigations revealed that after the accident, local bystanders had placed the injured Mayur in the tempo for transportation. However, when no one accompanied him to the hospital, the frightened tempo driver allegedly offloaded Mayur near the zebra crossing and left him there unattended.

Police have filed a case against the unknown vehicle driver for causing death by negligent and rash driving, under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Motor Vehicles Act. Efforts are ongoing to identify the vehicle involved in the hit-and-run.

Continue Reading

Crime

Mumbai Crime: RCF And Tilak Nagar Police Bust Illegal Prostitution Racket At Chembur Bar; Manager, Owner And Customer Arrested

Published

on

Mumbai: The Mumbai police have uncovered an illegal prostitution racket being run under the guise of a bar and restaurant at Pramila Bar and Restaurant located on RC Marg, Chembur. The RCF police, acting on a tip-off, raided the premises and apprehended the bar manager, bar owner, and a customer during the operation.

According to the complaint filed by Police Constable Amol Khatke,36, attached to the Crime Detection Unit of the RCF police station, the raid was carried out on the evening of October 4 at 6:45 PM by a joint team from RCF and Tilak Nagar police stations.

Police Inspector Mausami Patil of RCF police station had received credible information that prostitution activities were being conducted at the bar. Inspector Manisha Kulkarni from Tilak Nagar Police Station, designated as a Special Police Officer under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act (ITPA) and Government Resolution dated March 14, 2006, participated in the joint operation.

To confirm the illegal activities, police deployed a decoy customer, a 32-year-old man residing near Atop Hill Church, Kokari Agar, Mumbai, to the bar. Upon approaching bar manager Nishikant Sadanand Sahu,43, a resident of Chembur Camp, the decoy was informed that the charge for sexual services was Rs 1,000.

The decoy agreed and was directed to the first floor of the establishment where he ordered a drink. When a female bartender approached and engaged in inappropriate conduct, the police team raided the premises immediately. The woman, aged 41 and a resident of Ambedkar Nagar, Mankhurd, was caught accepting Rs1,000 from the decoy. The money was seized as evidence.

In total, eight adult women were found working at the bar, allegedly involved in prostitution. These women hailed from various localities, including Chembur, Tilak Nagar, Mankhurd and Ulhasnagar in Thane.

During interrogation, the women revealed that their involvement was facilitated through acquaintances engaged in prostitution from their residential areas.

They claimed they were introduced to the bar manager, Nishikant Sahu, who in turn confessed to operating the prostitution racket in collaboration with bar owner Vasant Chandrashekhar Shetty.

Police have registered a case against the accused under Section 144(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. Further investigation into the racket is currently underway.

Continue Reading

Crime

Mumbai Crime: 51-Year-Old Advocate Loses ₹2 Crore In Sextortion; FIR Filed

Published

on

Mumbai: A 51-year-old advocate from Goregaon West was allegedly defrauded of Rs 2 crore by a 28-year-old woman from Himachal Pradesh who allegedly threatened to file a false rape case against him. The Goregaon police have registered a case against the woman Parul Rana, her parents, sister, and a friend for extortion and defamation.

The advocate Rajeev Ranjan, who filed the complaint on October 3, has represented India as an ambassador at the United Nations, World Trade Organization, G7, BRICS, UNICEF, the Commonwealth, and several other prominent international organisations and summits.

According to the FIR, Ranjan met Rana in May 2024 at his residence through mutual friends, after which they exchanged contact details and social media IDs. In June 2024, while Ranjan was in Geneva for a conference, Rana called him late at night, claiming her relative was unwell and asked for Rs 50 lakh. He transferred Rs 2.5 lakh from his SBI account. Later, when he returned to India, she again sought money under various pretexts, including modelling expenses, and he gave her Rs 2.5 lakh in person.

Ranjan stated in the FIR that despite informing her that he was married with a daughter, Rana pursued a physical relationship with him. Afterwards, she demanded Rs 10 lakh, of which he paid Rs 5 lakh through a friend’s company account. She later sought more money, including Rs 3 lakh at Mumbai airport and Rs 10 lakh during a stay at his residence with her sister, Nidhi Rana. In July, Ranjan and Rana travelled to Bali, a trip he fully funded.

During the visit, she repeatedly demanded more money, including Rs 20 lakh for unspecified reasons. When he refused, she began threatening him using their private photos, warning that she would file a false rape case if he didn’t comply. Ranjan alleged that Rana’s parents – Harvinder and Meena Rana – her sister Nidhi, and a friend, Konika Verma, joined in the threats, calling him and demanding money. Out of fear, he continued sending money until the total reached Rs 2 crore, most of it in cash.

Later, Rana and her family allegedly contacted Ranjan’s wife, revealing the affair and demanding more money, again threatening legal action if he did not pay. Ranjan later approached the police, who registered a case for extortion, cheating, defamation and criminal conspiracy.

Continue Reading

Trending