Connect with us
Saturday,08-August-2026
Breaking News

Maharashtra

Devendra Fadnavis should clarify his position on Maharashtra Vishwas Nagre Patil’s participation in RSS event, Congress demands inquiry

Published

on

Congress has demanded an inquiry into Vishwas Nagre Patil, who was appointed as Nagpur Commissioner from Mumbai Anti-Corruption Bureau, after a video of him reciting the homily of its founder Dr. Krishna Hegdewar and describing the RSS as a patriotic organisation, went viral.

The Congress has written on Twitter and Facebook that an IPS officer enters the service by taking an oath on the Indian Constitution and accepting the responsibility of treating all citizens equally. He does not identify with any religion, caste, party or ideology. He identifies only with the Constitution. However, after watching the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh stage and Nangre Patil’s speech praising the Sangh, Hindutva and Dr. Hedgewar, a fundamental question arises: was he appointing as a constitutional post? Or was he representing a particular ideology? Now the question is not limited to Nangre Patil alone but is directly related to Maharashtra Home Minister and Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis. Therefore, as Chief Minister/Home Minister, Fadnavis should give clear answers to some questions before the people of Maharashtra. As per Rule 13(2)(f)(iii) of the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968, an IPS officer requires prior permission from the government to attend a private media video or similar event. Did Vishwas Nangre Patil take prior permission from the Maharashtra Home Department or the state government to attend this event? If so, under which rule was it given, will a copy of it be made public? If permission is not taken, will the government take action for violation of the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968? Violation of Rule 3(1)?. The All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968 clearly states that an officer should not indulge in any conduct that is unbecoming of his post. It would be appropriate for a common citizen to go to the forum of a particular ideological organization and publicly praise that ideology. But is it appropriate for an IPS officer in the service? A police officer is a guardian of the law, not a propagator of ideology.

Political neutrality or political loyalty?
Rule 3(1A)(ii) clearly states that every member of the service shall maintain political neutrality. “Political neutrality is the soul of the IPS service. So the question is whether to go to the forum of the Sangh and praise the ideology of neutrality or to express public loyalty to a particular political ideology? If tomorrow a senior police officer goes to the forum of any other religious or political organisation and starts praising them in the same way, how will the public have faith in the administration? Is the Constitution supreme or the ideology of the Sangh?

Rule 3(2B)(ii) binds every officer to the supremacy of the Constitution. The Constitution does not belong to any one religion, caste or ideology. It belongs to all Indians. So is it constitutional neutrality for a constitutional officer to go to the forum of a particular ideological organisation and publicly praise it? Rule 3(2B)(vi): “Suspected of being influenced” This rule prevents an officer from being influenced by any organisation or person that may affect his official duties.

Today, millions of citizens of Maharashtra are asking that if an officer openly praises a particular ideological organization on a platform, who will guarantee that his decisions tomorrow will not be influenced by that ideology? This is the most serious question. Rule 5(1): says,

“No member of the service shall be associated with any organization participating in politics.” “No officer in the service shall be associated with any organization participating in politics.” This rule is not limited to membership alone. The word “with affiliation” has been used deliberately. Then, will going to the platform of the Sangh and openly praising it not be considered “association”? Today, the question is not of one person.

The question is of the credibility of the Indian administrative system.

The question is of the supremacy of the Constitution.

The question is of maintaining the dignity of the khaki uniform. Therefore, this matter should be investigated, the permits should be made public and the government should be clear whether there has been a violation of the rules in this. Because there is no person, institution, or ideology greater than the Constitution. When IPS officer and Nagpur Commissioner Vishwas Nagre Patil was contacted to know his stand on this matter, he did not receive the call. After this viral video, there has been a stir among IPS officers as most IPS officers are part of any event from time to time, in such a situation, will action be taken against these IPS officers too?

Maharashtra

Courts Must Bin Cases Filed to Silence Dissent, Not Preach to Citizens: Ex-SC Judge Abhay Oka

Published

on

By Mumbai Press Bureau
MUMBAI — Constitutional courts are duty-bound to quash criminal proceedings launched merely to suppress dissent and must refrain from lecturing citizens on what they should or should not say, former Supreme Court judge Justice Abhay S. Oka emphasized at a legal event in the city.

Speaking at the inaugural Advocate Haroon Solkar Memorial Lecture Series held at the K.C. College auditorium in Mumbai, Justice Oka highlighted the urgent need to defend fundamental civil liberties amidst rising intolerance toward public criticism and opposition viewpoints.

The lecture focused on the theme “Article 19(1)(a) and Article 21: Followed or Forgotten?”, addressing the growing friction between state authority, judicial oversight, and constitutional rights.
“Not the Role of Courts to Preach or Teach”
Justice Oka—who served on the Supreme Court bench from August 2021 until May 2025—stressed that when citizens approach constitutional courts seeking relief against frivolous or politically motivated criminal prosecutions, the judiciary must stand at the forefront as their protective shield.

“The court may not like what the petitioners have said or expressed, but still it is the duty of the court to protect the freedom of speech and expression. It is not the function of the court to preach or teach the petitioner what he or she should have said or not said,” Justice Oka stated.

He added that judicial scrutiny in such matters should remain strictly limited to assessing whether an actual penal offense is disclosed under the law, rather than evaluating the social or political palatability of the statements.
Citing Sir Thomas More: “Rulers of the Day”
Invoking Irish writer Sir Thomas More, Justice Oka reminded the audience that in a vibrant democracy, citizens cannot be expected to express only opinions that please those in authority.

“Citizens are not expected to say only those things that are liked by the rulers of the day,” Justice Oka remarked, warning that suppressing unpopular viewpoints poses a direct threat to democratic governance.

“If democracy is to survive, we must guard and protect our freedoms guaranteed under Articles 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution of India—even if we have to pay a huge cost to protect these fundamental rights,” he urged the gathering of jurists, advocates, and legal scholars.

Peaceful Protest and “Forgotten Principles” of Dialogue
Underlining that peaceful assembly and demonstration are intrinsic to the right to free expression, Justice Oka emphasized that staging peaceful protests is often the primary lawful avenue citizens have to register dissatisfaction when public grievances go unaddressed.
While the state is not obligated to accept every demand, Justice Oka stressed that government institutions hold a fundamental obligation to engage in constructive dialogue.

“In a democracy, every citizen has a right to put forth his demands, and it is the duty of the state to deal with the same,” he noted. “The government may or may not accept it, but it is the government’s duty to consider it, have a dialogue and discussion. But perhaps with the passage of time, we have all forgotten these golden principles.”

He cautioned against the casual invocation of penal provisions against critics, journalists, and activists, pointing out that disagreement with an opinion should be met with an alternative viewpoint rather than punitive criminal proceedings.
State Obligations and Judicial Vigilance
Reflecting on constitutional duties, Justice Oka asserted that while citizens are frequently reminded of their obligations under Article 51A, the state holds a corresponding responsibility to uphold core constitutional ideals, including secularism, democracy, and personal liberty.

“In the present day, we rarely see the government respecting the ideals under the Constitution,” Justice Oka observed, calling on constitutional courts to remain ever-vigilant guardians against the erosion of fundamental freedoms. “I always believe that the courts must be at the forefront to protect the fundamental rights of citizens,” he concluded. “If courts are not going to protect these fundamental rights, then who is? It is the bounden duty of the courts to ensure that the Constitution and its ideals are not trampled upon.”

Continue Reading

Maharashtra

Stop the action under the guise of school jihad, MLA Abu Asim meets Additional Commissioner Dhananjay Kulkarni and submits memorandum

Published

on

Mumbai: The government is failing to open new schools, with incidents coming to light where private and trust-run schools that provide education to children in poor and minority areas are facing pressure and FIRs due to hateful propaganda like ‘school jihad’.

In the wake of this serious issue, Mankhurdshivaji Nagar MLA Abu Asim Azmi today met newly appointed Additional Commissioner of Police (Additional CP) Dhananjay Kulkarni along with a delegation of schools facing such action and submitted a memorandum. The memorandum requested that if a police visit to a school is necessary for investigation or investigation, the officers should appear in plain clothes. The delegation urged the authorities to avoid coming out of the school premises with police vans or heavy police force so as not to create an atmosphere of fear and panic among children, parents and teachers. It said that the trustees are ready to personally visit the police station to provide any necessary documents or records required by the police. The attitude of the police towards educational institutions that uphold the right to education for children from poor neighborhoods should be sensitive, cooperative and respectful.

Speaking on the occasion, Abu Asim Azmi stressed that the educational environment should remain safe, impartial and free from fear at all times. He stressed that the future of children from disadvantaged areas should not be sacrificed for any hateful agenda or baseless punitive actions.

Continue Reading

Maharashtra

Burglary suspect arrested in Mumbai, 6 cases solved

Published

on

Mumbai: Police has claimed to have arrested a burglar who has committed four burglaries within the limits of MHB police station, along with burglary and theft cases registered against him in Mumbai and its suburbs. Six theft cases have been solved after the arrest of the accused. Mumbai Police DCP Sandeep Ghoge said that the police traced the burglar within the limits of MHBC. The police came to know that he is residing in Kopar Khernar, Navi Mumbai, after which the police arrested the accused Kamaljeet Kaljit Singh, 26, and seized stolen property worth Rs 45 lakh, including gold ornaments and cash, from his possession. The police have also claimed to have seized stolen property worth Rs 45 lakh from him. The accused is a criminal and is also accused of being involved in theft and burglary cases in Dadar, Mahim, Kala Chowki, RCF, Dharavi. In this case, the police have taken action and arrested the burglar and the burglar and started further investigation.

Continue Reading

Trending