Connect with us
Wednesday,26-August-2026
Breaking News

Maharashtra

BMC Elections 2026: Nomination Forms Of Candidates Across Parties Rejected After Scrutiny Ahead Of Mumbai Civic Body Polls

Published

on

Mumbai: Scrutiny of nomination papers for the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections has led to the rejection of several candidates across parties due to incomplete documents, errors in forms and failure to submit mandatory certificates, election officials have said.

A total of 2,516 nomination papers were filed till December 30, the final day. As the forms were examined on Wednesday, those of candidates from the Congress, BJP, AAP, NCP (SP), Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) and several independents were rejected.

As most parties finalised seat-sharing arrangements and issued ‘A’ and ‘B’ forms (key documents to file nominations) only in the last two to three days to prevent rebellion, a rush of nominations was witnessed on December 29 and 30.

Officials said delays in finalising candidatures, last-minute documentation, non-submission of caste validity certificates and incomplete details were among the reasons behind the rejections.

Officials said candidates whose nominations were rejected would not be able to contest the elections. They added that the final electoral picture would become clearer after the completion of all statutory procedures related to the scrutiny process.

According to official data, the highest number of rejected nominations belonged to independent candidates, though major parties were also affected.

In the case of NCP (SP), the nomination filed by its candidate Bharat Danani from ward 109 was rejected during scrutiny.

One BSP candidate’s nomination was rejected in F-South ward (wards 200 to 206) as the proposer appeared twice on the form.

The nomination of Congress candidate Manoj Kanojiya from ward 226 could not be accepted as his caste certificate was not submitted, said officials. AAP candidate Navnath Lalge, who had filed his nomination from ward 226, also suffered a setback on the same ground.

Both BJP candidates from wards 211 and 212 saw their nominations rejected due to incomplete documents and other deficiencies, said officials.

In ward 109, six nominations that were rejected belonged to independents. All 12 nominations rejected in G-South wards (193 to 199) were independents, while several others were rejected in T division (wards 103 to 108), L ward (wards 163, 171 and 175) and other areas.

In ward 226, five nominations were filed. While the Congress and AAP candidates were disqualified for not submitting caste certificates, the nominations of BJP candidate Makarand Narvekar and two independents were found valid.

There are 227 electoral wards in BMC. The metropolis has 1,03,44,315 voters, including 55,16,707 male and 48,26,509 female voters. The number of “Other” voters is 1,099, according to officials.

In the last civic polls in 2017, the undivided Shiv Sena had won 84 seats. Of these winners, 46 have now switched to Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena. As many as 16 former corporators from other parties, including the Congress, NCP and SP, have also joined the Shiv Sena.

The BJP had won 82 seats last time. In the past eight years, six former corporators from other parties have joined it.

In 2017, the Congress had bagged 31 seats, followed by NCP (9), MNS (7), SP (6), AIMIM (2) and six others.

Elections to 29 municipal corporations, including the BMC, will be held on January 15, and votes will be counted the next day. The nomination process began on December 23 and ended on December 30, while January 2 is the last date for withdrawal of nominations. The final list of candidates will be published on January 3.

Maharashtra

Questions Raised by Mumbai MLAs Drop 72% in 15th Assembly, Praja Foundation Report Reveals

Published

on

MUMBAI, August 25, 2026: Legislative participation among Mumbai’s elected representatives has witnessed a sharp decline, with total questions raised in the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly dropping by 72% compared to the 12th Assembly, according to the ‘Mumbai MLA Report Card 2026’ released by Praja Foundation.

The report evaluated the performance of 33 Mumbai MLAs across the Winter 2024 and Monsoon 2025 sessions based on session attendance, participation, quality of questions raised, and overall constitutional duties. Out of 33 MLAs, only three scored above 80%, with Indian National Congress representatives securing all top three positions.
Top Performing MLAs

Rank 1: Amin Patel (Congress) — Score: 82.89

Rank 2: Aslam Shaikh (Congress) — Score: 80.58

Rank 3: Jyoti Gaikwad (Congress) — Score: 80.30

Key Report Findings

Plunge in Legislative Inquiries: MLAs asked only 2,213 questions in the 15th Assembly (Winter 2024 – Monsoon 2025), down significantly from 7,955 questions in the 12th Assembly (Winter 2009 – Monsoon 2010).

Decline in Question Quality: The quality score of questions asked dropped from an average of 50% in the 12th Assembly to 33% in the 15th Assembly.

Fewer Working Days: In its first year, the 15th Assembly met for only 40 working days, compared to 47 days in the 12th Assembly and 50 days in the 13th Assembly.

Stagnant Overall Scores: The overall average performance score of legislators fell from 61 in the 12th Assembly to 54 in the 14th Assembly, before slightly recovering to 55 in the 15th Assembly.

Aging Representatives: The average age of Mumbai MLAs has progressively increased over time, moving from 52 years (12th Assembly) and 51 years (13th Assembly) to 53 years (14th Assembly) and now 57 years in the 15th Assembly.

Concerns Over Democratic Accountability
Addressing the findings, Milind Mhaske, CEO of Praja Foundation, stated that performance metrics reflect whether citizens’ concerns are reaching the house floor. While top performers demonstrated strong engagement, the overall stagnating scores highlight significant gaps in representation.

Asif Khan, Manager at Praja Foundation, warned that shorter session durations and fewer quality questions deprive citizens of a critical mechanism to hold the government accountable.

Continue Reading

Maharashtra

Mumbai: Youth arrested for throwing an egg at the Mazgaon Ganpati procession.

Published

on

Police have claimed to have arrested a fanatic youth who threw eggs during a Ganpati procession in Mazgaon, Mumbai. On the night of August 23, a procession of the Raja of Mazgaon was taken out in Mumbai. During this time, a youth who was going to the same building for egg delivery was disturbed by the dust and smoke of crackers during the procession and in anger he threw an egg at the Ganpati idol, after which the situation became tense. However, the police identified the accused with the help of CCTV and he was arrested today. He has been identified as Danish Sher Khan, 22. The police traced the accused within 36 hours. Now the situation is tense, but peace has been restored. Just before Eid Milad-un-Nabi, the police arrested the anti-social Danish and started the investigation. In the initial investigation, the police have found that the accused had committed this act in anger. The accused was carrying an online order. Meanwhile, due to the crowd in the procession with him, his eyes were hurt by the smoke and dust of the crackers, which caused him to lose his temper. The egg I had brought for delivery was thrown at the Ganpati procession, after which the situation became tense and the police resolved the matter. This action was taken by DCP Jayant Meena on the instructions of Mumbai Police Commissioner Devin Bharti.

Continue Reading

Maharashtra

Versova-Bandra Sea Link gets a 1,421-day extension — where is the penalty?

Published

on

Mumbai: Information provided by the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) under the Right to Information (RTI) Act has revealed significant delays in Mumbai’s ambitious Versova Samudra Bandra Sea Link (VBSLP) project. The project’s start date was June 24, 2019, and under the original contract, it was scheduled to be completed by June 21, 2024. However, due to various reasons, the project has been extended by a total of 1,421 days in four phases, despite which the final revised completion date was pushed forward, not to May 2, 2024, but to May 17. No penalty has been imposed on the contractor, Webuild-Apco JV.

According to information provided by MSRDC in response to an RTI application filed by Anil Gilgli, the first extension of 250 days was granted on June 23, 2020. The main reason was non-availability of land required for the casting yard. Subsequently, on September 14, 2020, an additional extension of 180 days was granted due to restrictions and work disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Later, on February 10, 2022, an extension of 483 days was granted due to restructuring or changes within the EPC contractors’ joint venture (JV). Finally, on January 19, 2024, a further extension of 508 days was granted due to changes in the scope of work and additional works. The total duration of these four extensions is 1,421 days, with the final date of completion of the project set at May 17, 2028. According to the MSRDC letter dated June 23, 2020, the contractor had sought an extension of about 311 days for the period from April 2020 to April 2020. The reasons for the delay during this period include various incidents as well as the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequently, revised work phases and timelines were established for the project. Meanwhile, the MSRDC letter dated January 19, 2024 mentions further extension based on changes in the scope of work and revision of work phases.

A serious question arises as to why no punitive action has been taken against the contractor Webuild-Apco JV for the delay despite repeated extensions to the project. RTI activist and senior journalist Anil Gilgali said that the financial burden of delay in this important project, which was run with public money, may ultimately fall on the government exchequer and the common people. Therefore, instead of simply giving relief to Webuild-Apco JV by way of extension of time, the penalty provisions stipulated in the contract should be strictly enforced.

“The Versova-Bandra Sea Link project has been given an extension of a total of 1,421 days. The original completion date was June 21, 2024, while the last date has now been extended to May 17, 2028. The delay in the project is resulting in wastage of both public funds and time. Therefore, by simply stating the reason, the reason is given. Anil Galgali demanded that damages (LD)—penalties for compensation for losses—should be immediately imposed on the contractor, Webuild-Apco JV and recovered as per the provisions of the contract. Galgali added, “An extension does not mean allowing the Webuild-Apco JV contractor to delay the work. While some reasons for the delay may be acceptable, the responsibilities and penalty clauses stipulated in the contract must be implemented. It is a matter of serious concern that the final deadline for this project, which was set on June 2, 2019—has now been extended to May 17, 2028. Therefore, MSRDC should publicly disclose clear details about the reasons for each extension, the party responsible for the delay, the additional financial burden resulting from it, and whether the damages have been averted.

The Versova-Bandra Sea Link is a key project for Mumbai’s traffic infrastructure. However, the project timeline continues to be extended due to continuous delays in the work. Consequently, the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) should clearly identify the reasons and accountability for these delays and recover penalty from the Webuild-Apco JV contractor for any delays attributable to them, as per the contract. Additionally, RTI activist Anil Gilgali has demanded steps to ensure that the extended project period does not impose additional financial burden on the government exchequer.

Continue Reading

Trending