Connect with us
Friday,07-August-2026
Breaking News

Maharashtra

‘Bandh Was Within Purview Of Indian Constitution’, Sharad Pawar Reacts On Bombay HC Direction On Maharashtra Strike

Published

on

'Bandh Was Within Purview Of Indian Constitution', Sharad Pawar Reacts On Bombay HC Direction On Maharashtra Strike

The NCP (SP) chief Sharad Pawar has expressed his dismay in the decision of Bombay High Court’s (HC) decision on the Maharashtra Bandh called by the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) on Saturday, August 24. High Court on Friday said it will ask the political parties and individuals to “restrain” from calling Maharashtra Bandh. Pawar said that the decision is outside the purview of the Indian Constitution and because of the time constraint to appeal to the Supreme Court, I appeal to call off the strike.

Taking social media platform X, the veteran leader said, “In the wake of Badlapur incident, a state-wide public strike was called on August 24. The abuse against the two minor girls is disgusting and strong public sentiments have emerged. The strike was to bring in government’s attention in this matter.”

“The strike was within the Fundamental Rights of Constiution of India. However, the Bombay HC’s decision of outside the purview of the Constitution. There is an urgent need to appeal in the Suprem Court against HC decision. However, due to time constraints, it is not possible. As the judiciary is part of the Constitution, we should respect it. I appeal to take back the Maharashtra Bandh,” Pawar’s post in Marathi said.

A petition was filed in the Bombay HC on Friday against Saturday’s Maharashtra Bandh calling it illegal. HC heard the case and said it will ask the political parties and individuals to “restrain” from calling Maharashtra Bandh. The HC has also directed the state government to take all necessary preventive steps against the bandh.

Maharashtra

Courts Must Bin Cases Filed to Silence Dissent, Not Preach to Citizens: Ex-SC Judge Abhay Oka

Published

on

By Mumbai Press Bureau
MUMBAI — Constitutional courts are duty-bound to quash criminal proceedings launched merely to suppress dissent and must refrain from lecturing citizens on what they should or should not say, former Supreme Court judge Justice Abhay S. Oka emphasized at a legal event in the city.

Speaking at the inaugural Advocate Haroon Solkar Memorial Lecture Series held at the K.C. College auditorium in Mumbai, Justice Oka highlighted the urgent need to defend fundamental civil liberties amidst rising intolerance toward public criticism and opposition viewpoints.

The lecture focused on the theme “Article 19(1)(a) and Article 21: Followed or Forgotten?”, addressing the growing friction between state authority, judicial oversight, and constitutional rights.
“Not the Role of Courts to Preach or Teach”
Justice Oka—who served on the Supreme Court bench from August 2021 until May 2025—stressed that when citizens approach constitutional courts seeking relief against frivolous or politically motivated criminal prosecutions, the judiciary must stand at the forefront as their protective shield.

“The court may not like what the petitioners have said or expressed, but still it is the duty of the court to protect the freedom of speech and expression. It is not the function of the court to preach or teach the petitioner what he or she should have said or not said,” Justice Oka stated.

He added that judicial scrutiny in such matters should remain strictly limited to assessing whether an actual penal offense is disclosed under the law, rather than evaluating the social or political palatability of the statements.
Citing Sir Thomas More: “Rulers of the Day”
Invoking Irish writer Sir Thomas More, Justice Oka reminded the audience that in a vibrant democracy, citizens cannot be expected to express only opinions that please those in authority.

“Citizens are not expected to say only those things that are liked by the rulers of the day,” Justice Oka remarked, warning that suppressing unpopular viewpoints poses a direct threat to democratic governance.

“If democracy is to survive, we must guard and protect our freedoms guaranteed under Articles 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution of India—even if we have to pay a huge cost to protect these fundamental rights,” he urged the gathering of jurists, advocates, and legal scholars.

Peaceful Protest and “Forgotten Principles” of Dialogue
Underlining that peaceful assembly and demonstration are intrinsic to the right to free expression, Justice Oka emphasized that staging peaceful protests is often the primary lawful avenue citizens have to register dissatisfaction when public grievances go unaddressed.
While the state is not obligated to accept every demand, Justice Oka stressed that government institutions hold a fundamental obligation to engage in constructive dialogue.

“In a democracy, every citizen has a right to put forth his demands, and it is the duty of the state to deal with the same,” he noted. “The government may or may not accept it, but it is the government’s duty to consider it, have a dialogue and discussion. But perhaps with the passage of time, we have all forgotten these golden principles.”

He cautioned against the casual invocation of penal provisions against critics, journalists, and activists, pointing out that disagreement with an opinion should be met with an alternative viewpoint rather than punitive criminal proceedings.
State Obligations and Judicial Vigilance
Reflecting on constitutional duties, Justice Oka asserted that while citizens are frequently reminded of their obligations under Article 51A, the state holds a corresponding responsibility to uphold core constitutional ideals, including secularism, democracy, and personal liberty.

“In the present day, we rarely see the government respecting the ideals under the Constitution,” Justice Oka observed, calling on constitutional courts to remain ever-vigilant guardians against the erosion of fundamental freedoms. “I always believe that the courts must be at the forefront to protect the fundamental rights of citizens,” he concluded. “If courts are not going to protect these fundamental rights, then who is? It is the bounden duty of the courts to ensure that the Constitution and its ideals are not trampled upon.”

Continue Reading

Maharashtra

Stop the action under the guise of school jihad, MLA Abu Asim meets Additional Commissioner Dhananjay Kulkarni and submits memorandum

Published

on

Mumbai: The government is failing to open new schools, with incidents coming to light where private and trust-run schools that provide education to children in poor and minority areas are facing pressure and FIRs due to hateful propaganda like ‘school jihad’.

In the wake of this serious issue, Mankhurdshivaji Nagar MLA Abu Asim Azmi today met newly appointed Additional Commissioner of Police (Additional CP) Dhananjay Kulkarni along with a delegation of schools facing such action and submitted a memorandum. The memorandum requested that if a police visit to a school is necessary for investigation or investigation, the officers should appear in plain clothes. The delegation urged the authorities to avoid coming out of the school premises with police vans or heavy police force so as not to create an atmosphere of fear and panic among children, parents and teachers. It said that the trustees are ready to personally visit the police station to provide any necessary documents or records required by the police. The attitude of the police towards educational institutions that uphold the right to education for children from poor neighborhoods should be sensitive, cooperative and respectful.

Speaking on the occasion, Abu Asim Azmi stressed that the educational environment should remain safe, impartial and free from fear at all times. He stressed that the future of children from disadvantaged areas should not be sacrificed for any hateful agenda or baseless punitive actions.

Continue Reading

Maharashtra

Burglary suspect arrested in Mumbai, 6 cases solved

Published

on

Mumbai: Police has claimed to have arrested a burglar who has committed four burglaries within the limits of MHB police station, along with burglary and theft cases registered against him in Mumbai and its suburbs. Six theft cases have been solved after the arrest of the accused. Mumbai Police DCP Sandeep Ghoge said that the police traced the burglar within the limits of MHBC. The police came to know that he is residing in Kopar Khernar, Navi Mumbai, after which the police arrested the accused Kamaljeet Kaljit Singh, 26, and seized stolen property worth Rs 45 lakh, including gold ornaments and cash, from his possession. The police have also claimed to have seized stolen property worth Rs 45 lakh from him. The accused is a criminal and is also accused of being involved in theft and burglary cases in Dadar, Mahim, Kala Chowki, RCF, Dharavi. In this case, the police have taken action and arrested the burglar and the burglar and started further investigation.

Continue Reading

Trending