Crime
‘A dangerous profession’: Many US presidents have faced assassination attempts
New York, April 26: “It’s a dangerous profession”, US President Donald Trump said when a reporter asked him about the latest assassination attempt against him.
It indeed is: He has faced three assassination attempts, the latest on Saturday, with one attempt during his presidential campaign injuring him.
Like him, many US presidents have come under violent attacks, and four were killed.
On July 13, 2024, when Trump was campaigning for president’s elections in Pennsylvania, he had a miraculous escape with the bullet only grazing his ear as he tilted his head to look at a chart projected on a giant screen.
It fatally struck a man on the stage behind him, and the gunman who fired at him at the open-air venue from a nearby building was killed by a Secret Service sharpshooter.
There was a furore over the security lapse, and several Secret Service personnel faced action.
Two months later, on September 15, 2024, a man was discovered hidden in the shrubbery with a rifle at the fence around Trump’s golf course in Florida.
A Secret Service agent fired at him, but he fled and was later captured, put on trial and sentenced in February to life in prison.
Like many politicians across the ideological spectrum and judges and other officials, Trump continually gets death threats in a sharply polarised nation.
The Hilton Hotel, where Saturday’s attempt against Trump took place, featured in another presidential assassination attempt: It was against Ronald Reagan, who was shot and wounded in March 1981 outside the hotel.
Reagan suffered a puncture to his lung in the attack by a man who was declared insane and escaped trial.
The man, John Hinckley, claimed he tried to kill Reagan to impress the actress, Jodie Foster, on whom he had a fixation.
John F. Kennedy was a presidential victim to die. He was killed in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963, by an American who had defected to the Soviet Union and returned to the US.
That man, Lee Harvey Oswald, was, in turn, killed by Jack Ruby, who was said to be angry at him, but it gave rise to several conspiracy theories.
Oswald shot Kennedy from a building while the president was riding in an open car.
John Kennedy’s brother, Robert, was killed five years later in California while he was campaigning for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination.
Gerald Ford came close to being killed by a member of a cult in September 1975 in California.
But the gun pointed at him from a close range failed, and the woman wielding it spent 34 years in prison for it.
An Indian origin man, Sai Varshith Kandula, who rammed a truck at a barrier to the White House in May 2023, said he planned to kill Joe Biden and take over the country.
He had a Nazi flag in his truck and expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler. He was sentenced to eight years in prison.
President Abraham Lincoln was the first president to be assassinated. He was shot dead on April 18, 1865, inside a Washington theatre.
Lincoln had led the nation in the Civil War, in which he defeated the secessionist states that opposed the abolition of slavery.
Other presidents killed are James Garfield in 1881 and William McKinley in 1901.
Crime
Karnataka: Convict’s wife’s complaint exposes alleged sexual exploitation, forged SC order release racket

Bengaluru, Oct 6: What began with a prisoner’s wife allegedly being sexually exploited by prison officials and ended with her husband walking out of jail on the strength of a forged Supreme Court order took a further turn on Tuesday after the convict allegedly abandoned her and married another woman.
This prompted the wife to write a detailed complaint to the Prison Department, which brought the alleged conspiracy to light, police said on Tuesday.
The Parappana Agrahara police in Bengaluru have arrested life convict Shankar A. and prison employee Srikanth S., while Prison Department North Zone DIG Somashekar has also been arrested in connection with the alleged forgery and illegal release of the prisoner from Bengaluru Central Prison in 2018.
Police said the case surfaced after Shankar’s wife, who had been visiting the prison while her husband was serving his life sentence, wrote to the Prison Department after he was released and allegedly deserted her to marry another woman. In her complaint, she reportedly detailed the alleged sexual exploitation by prison officials and the circumstances surrounding her husband’s release.
According to police, Srikanth, who was then working as a Second Division Assistant (SDA) and is now a First Division Assistant in the Convict Prisoner Section, allegedly sexually exploited the woman and later helped fabricate a Supreme Court order to facilitate Shankar’s release.
During the investigation, the woman’s statement also allegedly revealed the involvement of Somashekar, who was serving as Chief Superintendent/DIG at the time. Police said Somashekar allegedly made video calls to the woman and asked her to strip. Investigators have obtained the purported video and sent it to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) for examination.
Police said the woman had become acquainted with Somashekar during her visits to the prison. He allegedly offered to help her secure her husband’s release and subsequently exploited her. Srikanth allegedly joined the effort and helped prepare the forged court document.
The police investigation began following a complaint filed by Karna B. Kshetri, Superintendent-in-Charge of Central Prison, Bengaluru, on May 20. The complaint alleged that Shankar had fabricated a copy of a Supreme Court order and falsely claimed that he had been released on November 13, 2018, on the basis of the purported order.
A case was registered at Parappana Agrahara Police Station under Sections 465, 468, 471 and 420 of the IPC.
Police found that Shankar had been convicted in a case registered at Chikkapet Police Station under Sections 364(A) and 120(B) of the IPC. The Fast Track Court-I, in its judgment dated July 12, 2004, had sentenced him to life imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 10,000. His conviction and sentence were subsequently upheld by the Karnataka High Court and the Supreme Court.
According to the investigation, Srikanth allegedly fabricated a copy of a purported Supreme Court order relating to a criminal appeal petition dated November 2, 2018. Based on the forged document, Shankar was released from Central Prison on November 13, 2018.
Shankar and Srikanth were arrested and produced before a court, which remanded them to judicial custody. Somashekar was subsequently arrested and remanded to police custody till October 9 for further questioning and investigation.
Police are examining Somashekar’s alleged role in the sexual exploitation of the convict’s wife and in the circumstances surrounding Shankar’s release in detail. Investigators are also probing whether similar forged documents were used to secure the release of other prisoners.
The investigation is being conducted under M. Narayana, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Electronic City Division. Assistant Commissioner of Police Satish K.M., Police Inspector P.G. Naveen Kumar, PSIs Mahadevayya and Kalavathi, and other personnel were involved in the investigation and arrests.
Crime
‘Create fear among criminals’: SC tells Delhi Police in suo motu case on recent rape incidents

New Delhi, Oct 5: The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Delhi Police and the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to place their responses on record within four weeks in its suo motu proceedings concerning recent rape and sexual assault incidents in Delhi-NCR, orally observing that it was important to prevent crimes rather than taking follow-up action.
A Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran stressed the need for effective preventive measures and continuous monitoring of vulnerable public spaces to ensure the safety of women and children.
The apex court orally remarked that merely putting measures on paper would not be sufficient and said that authorities must take concrete action to prevent crimes.
“We have to work together. We must ensure that every woman in Delhi-NCR should feel safe even at 11 p.m. whether travelling on the roads or the metro,” the Justice Pardiwala-led Bench observed.
It further said that the focus should be on preventing crime rather than merely acting after an offence has taken place.
“What is important is to prevent a crime, not what you do after a crime is committed,” the top court said, stressing that the police must create fear among “goons and anti-social elements” who are prone to committing such crimes.
The Supreme Court also questioned the Delhi Police on the effectiveness of CCTV surveillance in the absence of continuous monitoring and asked whether there was a mechanism for continuous monitoring of vulnerable areas.
It also questioned the absence of a dedicated “war room” for monitoring and responding to incidents, asking how crime could be prevented without such a mechanism.
“You have to create fear in the mind of a person who is ready to commit a crime,” the bench observed, adding that the police were required to instil the fear that committing such offences would have severe consequences.
The proceedings arise from the Supreme Court’s suo motu cognisance of a series of disturbing reports of rape and sexual assault across Delhi-NCR.
In its order passed on September 28, the apex court had expressed serious concern over the safety of public spaces, including parks, roads, buses, metro stations, subways and footbridges, observing that such places could not be allowed to become high-risk zones due to inadequate lighting, poor surveillance, or lax patrolling.
The bench had also sought a comprehensive status report on the safety arrangements in public places, the use of the National Database on Sexual Offenders (NDSO), the Investigation Tracking System for Sexual Offences (ITSSO), the Mission Shakti programme, emergency response systems, women’s helplines, CCTV coverage, women help desks and One Stop Centres.
It had directed the Delhi Police to constitute dedicated teams for each police district to identify vulnerable locations and prepare district-wise vulnerability maps. It had further ordered audits of lighting and CCTV infrastructure and intensified patrolling in identified vulnerable areas.
The proceedings came against the backdrop of several reported sexual offences, including the alleged gang rape of a 17-year-old girl at Aastha Kunj Park and the alleged sexual assault of a minor inside a moving sleeper bus travelling from Greater Noida to Delhi. The apex court had observed that the latter incident raised painful parallels with the 2012 Nirbhaya case.
The matter is now tentatively listed for further hearing on November 16.
Crime
Delhi Police bust two fake job placement call centres near Shadipur metro station; 11 held

New Delhi, Oct 5: Delhi Police have busted two fake job-placement call centres operating from Lal Ratan Building near Shadipur Metro Station in Ranjit Nagar and apprehended 11 operatives in separate raids.
According to police, the two operations were carried out by teams of Special Staff, Ranjit Nagar Police Station and Cyber Police Station, Central District. The accused targeted unemployed job seekers by obtaining their personal data from online job-search and recruitment platforms and using it to make targeted calls.
The fraudsters posed as recruiters and offered attractive employment opportunities to prospective candidates. They subsequently demanded registration and processing fees under different pretexts. Police said amounts of Rs 3,500, Rs 1,400 and Rs 1,200 were demanded from job seekers under different packages.
The first operation was conducted on October 3 after police received information about a suspected fake job-placement centre functioning in the area. Technical analysis and field verification indicated that a significant number of calls linked to the suspected recruitment activity were originating from the location.
A police team subsequently raided the premises and apprehended six persons, including four women and two men. During the search, police examined computer systems, calling applications and digital material allegedly being used to contact job seekers.
Police said the suspects were using job-seeker data and contact details to approach prospective candidates and offer them employment. After collecting registration fees, the callers allegedly continued communicating with the candidates for a few days, assuring them about the proposed employment and further formalities. Communication was then allegedly discontinued without providing the promised jobs.
In a separate operation, a joint team of Special Staff and Police Station Cyber, Central District, raided another suspected fake job-placement call centre in the same building based on specific intelligence. Five male operatives were allegedly found actively working from calling cubicles and were apprehended.
When questioned, the operatives failed to produce corporate authorisation letters, placement agreements or records establishing that candidates had actually been placed in jobs. Police also found “Xlite” VoIP calling software installed on computers, along with job-seeker data and other digital evidence.
The two raids resulted in the apprehension of 11 persons in total.
Those apprehended from the first centre have been identified as Arpit, 38; Sakina, 29; Karishma, 27; Meenakshi, 28; Chanchal, 27; and Ashok, 36. All are residents of different parts of Delhi.
The five operatives apprehended in the second centre have been identified as Asim, 32; Sandeep, 29; Gaurav Malik, 34; Gyan Singh, 32; and Rohit, 34.
Police seized 13 computer systems, five mobile phones, calling applications, job-seeker data, contact details, communication records and digital evidence related to suspected financial transactions from the two premises.
According to police, the accused allegedly obtained job-seeker information from online recruitment platforms, including Shine.com in one case, and used the data to make targeted calls. They lured candidates with attractive job offers before demanding registration or processing fees.
Further investigation is underway to identify the alleged owners and masterminds behind the two operations, trace the source of the job-seeker data, examine financial transactions and identify other persons involved in the suspected network.
A case under Sections 319(2), 318(4), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) has been registered in the case investigated by Police Station Ranjit Nagar. The seized electronic devices and digital data are being examined as per the law.
-
Crime4 years agoClass 10 student jumps to death in Jaipur
-
Maharashtra2 years agoMumbai Local Train Update: Central Railway’s New Timetable Comes Into Effect; Check Full List Of Revised Timings & Stations
-
Maharashtra2 years agoMumbai To Go Toll-Free Tonight! Maharashtra Govt Announces Complete Toll Waiver For Light Motor Vehicles At All 5 Entry Points Of City
-
Maharashtra2 years agoFalse photo of Imtiaz Jaleel’s rally, exposing the fooling conspiracy
-
National News2 years agoMinistry of Railways rolls out Special Drive 4.0 with focus on digitisation, cleanliness, inclusiveness and grievance redressal
-
Maharashtra2 years agoMaharashtra Elections 2024: Mumbai Metro & BEST Services Extended Till Midnight On Voting Day
-
National News2 years agoJ&K: 4 Jawans Killed, 28 Injured After Bus Carrying BSF Personnel For Poll Duty Falls Into Gorge In Budgam; Terrifying Visuals Surface
-
Crime2 years agoBaba Siddique Murder: Mumbai Police Unable To Get Lawrence Bishnoi Custody Due To Home Ministry Order, Says Report
